@reasoning logic,
Quote:Bullshit mountain is the place where people stand and talk about things that they can not show evidence for.
So this is what you "think" bullshit mountain is? Do you think it is also fair to say that people should be able to think that trying to find evidence for everything that they say...Could be bullshit mountain also? Cause this is an opinion that can't be proven correct? Or do you think it can be?
Quote:let people come to the best understanding of what right and wrong is and not tell them that they should not consider moral philosophy.
Why do you think that anyone is actually trying to do this? You claim it, but can you prove that God or his believers do this? Other than your own opinions...? If you can't...Do you think this also fits the definition of bullshit mountain? Or no?
Quote:So why and lie about it and teach other things that are immoral?
Who says that they are? What if they really are not? If some of it is true..."And is the most moral things you have ever heard"...Why do you think that some of it would be immoral? And is the most immoral? If it is the same God, would he not realize these mistakes? And if it is not a God, but people who were just thinking philisophical...Why do you think that someone over the many many years would put them together, if some of the things are moral? And some are not? Do you think they would have seen what you have? And others? Or no? Does it all have to be either moral? Or immoral? Even if it is just not fully comprehended but thought that it is? If it is in the same book?
In other words...Do you think it is the book that is immoral, at times? Or is it just your own thinking that thinks it is not the same? Please explain...