52
   

Question to those who do or do not doubt Christianity

 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 11:52 am
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Do you mean like the bible?


LOL......................
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 12:16 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
If you want people to think you're so terribly clever, perhaps you could try sounding like someone who has read a book for once.


We all have our abilities and our short comings but lacking skills in writing compare to lacking the ability to view the universe in a sane and rational manner the latter is a few orders of magnitude a greater handicapped in life.

The man believes in Demons repeat Demons revealed in hot smoke clouds……….

It the same as seeing Jesus image in a piece of burned toast.

Sorry but that is as insane/irrational as anything could be insane/irrational and no matter how you try to defend this silliness by pointing out my failings in writing skills no one is enough of a magician to pull that off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote when had reading Shakespeare’s plays granted anyone the ability to write like Shakespeare? When had reading tens of thousands of books over a life time grant someone great writing style?

At least if you wish to mount an attack it would be helpful to have some logic on you side in so doing.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 01:12 pm
@BillRM,
I don't think anybody expects you to write like Shakespeare, but you could try writing like someone who has been to school.

You just think everyone should think the same as you, and you bully and harass those who don't. You hounded AM furiously. So what if Spade master believes in demons. He's not hurting anyone. You can't prove it's not a demon's head in the smoke. Why should we listen to you? You're a zealot. Your proseletysing mission is pursued so vigorously, that seeing a demon in smoke seems the far more reasonable choice than any of your maniacal theories.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 04:19 pm
@izzythepush,
Insane believes are insane believes and the fact that no one can disprove any believe under the sun one hundreds percents does not shield such craziness from being label correctly craziness.

Real demons playing in the fireballs at the World Trade Center likelihood approve zero as a limit.

Second the man came into the public square with this nonsense I did not seek him out.



reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 04:29 pm
@BillRM,
We all see things at times, kind of like this!

I could be alone at seeing this but I do not think so!

I may be seeing things but at 3 minutes 30 seconds into this video that is aired the day of 911 this man predicts many things that are going to happen as if he could see into the future. Am I alone at seeing this!


0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 05:11 pm
@BillRM,
Having said all that, he still makes a more coherent argument than you do.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2011 07:30 pm
@izzythepush,
Oh so he make a good argument for demons dancing around the World Trade Central in your opinion.

How very interesting ............................... Drunk



izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 01:07 am
@BillRM,
He's not quite so rabid and proseletysing. There comes a time Bill, when your association with something has the opposite effect to the one you intended.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 02:38 am
@izzythepush,
If you or others wish to believe in Demons dancing around in happiness in the smoke of the fires of the twin towers please be my guest.

Still if you come into the public square with such nonsense or similar nonsense be prepare to had your believes challenge and in fact call the nonsense if happen to be on it face.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 03:20 am
@BillRM,
I believe in writing in coherent sentences. If you come into the public square and articulate your arguments in the language of a 5 year old, don't expect to be taken seriously.

Quote:
be prepare to had your believes challenge


How can you write the above ****-awful piece of grating prose? Even when you're aware of your grammatical failings, you're unwilling or unable to take even the most rudimetary steps to correct it.

be preparedD to haVE your belieFS challengeD.

There, now that wasn't difficult was it?

wayne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 03:44 am
@izzythepush,
I've been curious about this writing thing of Bill's too, it just seems a bit too deliberate.
I think it's a game he plays, to bait the newcomers and annoy the oldtimers.
He's not stupid, after all, and you can't tell me he doesn't know the difference between had and have.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 03:46 am
@wayne,
It's just so bad though. At least when OmSig writes in his eccentric way he is making a point. I dispise bullies, and Bill is a bully, so he's just getting a bit of payback.
wayne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:04 am
@izzythepush,
I agree, it's horrible, nothing at all like Dave's technique.
The word you used "grating" is exactly right, I think that's probably his aim.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:21 am
@wayne,
Well if he wishes to irritate he's succeeded, but if he wants to be taken seriously he's got to do a lot better.
wayne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:30 am
@izzythepush,
No one could possibly take Bill as seriously as he does himself, he's the king of his own little castle, which he never leaves.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:33 am
@izzythepush,
Why would I dream of being taken as seriously as someone who believe in Demons?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:50 am
@izzythepush,
Addressing Bill . . .

izzythepush wrote:
Well, you wouldn't know it, judging by the way you write. Did none of it sink in? Really, there's a thirteen year old girl whose sentence construction is significantly better than yours.

If you want people to think you're so terribly clever, perhaps you could try sounding like someone who has read a book for once.


Don't hold your breath. Judging by his performance here, almost none of it sank in. He can't do subject-verb agreement, he routinely leaves out or butchers past participles, and his vocabulary is like something from a comedian' s routine. A few pages back, he was using the verb "to convict"--i suspect the verb he wanted was to convince--and it wasn't just a fluke or a typo. He used it twice in as many sentences. I'd flunk a middle school child who couldn't write any better than he does.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:53 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
Quote:
perhaps you could try sounding like someone who has read a book for once.


Do you mean like the bible?


You always were a snide son of a bitch. As it happens, the King James version of the bible has some of the most elegant writing in the language. One can appreciate the quality of the writing without subscribing to the superstition. Unless, of course, one is like Bill, and so convinced of the excellence of his narrow and ill-informed opinions that he can't see anything beyond his little playpen.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 04:55 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
You just think everyone should think the same as you, and you bully and harass those who don't. You hounded AM furiously. So what if Spade master believes in demons. He's not hurting anyone. You can't prove it's not a demon's head in the smoke. Why should we listen to you? You're a zealot. Your proseletysing mission is pursued so vigorously, that seeing a demon in smoke seems the far more reasonable choice than any of your maniacal theories.


Bill is the kind of clown who gives atheists a bad name. For him, it has all the characteristics of a religion which he is attempting to shove down people's throats. Describing him as a zealot is right on the money.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 05:55 am
@Setanta,
As long as people don't preach hate and divisiveness they can believe what they want. However, I give short shrift to those who try to proseletyse, like Bill and Jason Goldman. When the proseletyser in question claims to be smarter than anyone else they need to provide evidence. Bill's evidence is lacking to say the least.

As for RL's reasoning and logic, anyone who gives serious consideration to the mad conspiracy bollocks about the World being run by three City States, the Vatican, Washington and the City Of London has shown neither reason nor logic.
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/27/2024 at 10:56:52