4
   

Obama's Ties To The Christian Brotherhood

 
 
Reply Wed 1 Jun, 2011 10:16 pm
Barack Obama has declared that all opposition groups should have representation in the next Egyptian government, which essentially ensures that the Muslim Brotherhood will be part of that government. The Brotherhood is the largest opposition group in Egypt, so it will probably end up in the driver’s seat in any new regime, and steer Egypt toward becoming an Islamic state inveterately hostile to the United States.

So why isn’t Obama working to limit the Brotherhood’s scope and influence? Maybe because he doesn’t really have a problem with the Brotherhood, despite its hostility to America. He made sure to invite Brotherhood leaders to attend his notorious speech to the Islamic world in Cairo, Egypt, in June 4, 2009. Starting in the earliest days of his administration, he showed an intense desire to establish friendly ties with Brotherhood-linked organizations—despite the Brotherhood’s stated goal of “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.”

Obama first reached out to the Brotherhood when he chose the leader of a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that had been named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case to give a prayer during his inauguration ceremonies. Ingrid Mattson, then-president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), offered this prayer at the National Cathedral on Obama’s Inauguration Day—despite the fact that the ISNA has admitted its ties to the Brotherhood. The previous summer, federal prosecutors rejected a request from the ISNA to remove its unindicted co-conspirator status.

Obama didn’t ask Mattson to explain the ISNA’s links to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. On the contrary: He sent his senior adviser, Valerie Jarrett, to be the keynote speaker at the ISNA’s national convention in 2009.

Even worse, in April 2009, Obama appointed Arif Alikhan, the deputy mayor of Los Angeles, as assistant secretary for policy development at the Department of Homeland Security. Just two weeks before he received this appointment, Alikhan (who once called the jihad terror group Hezbollah a “liberation movement”) participated in a fund-raiser for the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). Like the ISNA, MPAC has links to the Muslim Brotherhood. In a book titled In Fraternity: A Message to Muslims in America, co-author Hassan Hathout, a former MPAC president, is identified as “a close disciple of the late Hassan al-Banna of Egypt. "The MPAC-linked magazine The Minaret spoke of Hathout’s closeness to al-Banna in a 1997 article: “My father would tell me that Hassan Hathout was a companion of Hassan al-Banna. ... Hassan Hathout would speak of al-Banna with such love and adoration; he would speak of a relationship not guided by politics or law but by a basic sense of human decency.”

The late al-Banna, of course, was the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Terror researcher Steven Emerson’s Investigative Project has documented MPAC’s indefatigable and consistent opposition to virtually every domestic anti-terror initiative. Its magazine The Minaret has dismissed key counterterror operations as part of “[t]he American crusade against Islam and Muslims.” For his part, while Alikhan was deputy mayor of Los Angeles, he blocked a Los Angeles Police Department project to assemble data about the ethnic makeup of mosques in the Los Angeles area. This was not an attempt to conduct surveillance of the mosques or monitor them in any way. LAPD Deputy Chief Michael P. Downing explained that it was actually an outreach program: “We want to know where the Pakistanis, Iranians, and Chechens are so we can reach out to those communities.” But Alikhan and other Muslim leaders said that the project manifested racism and “Islamophobia,” and the LAPD ultimately discarded all plans to study the mosques.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a pro-Sharia group. Obama’s chief adviser on Islamic affairs, Dalia Mogahed, is a pro-Sharia Muslim. In their Gallup survey published under the hubristic title "Who Speaks for Islam? What A Billion Muslims Really Think," Mogahed and Saudi-funded dhimmi, or non-Muslim, pseudo-academic John Esposito cooked their data to increase the number of Muslim “moderates,” counting as “moderate” Muslims who wanted Sharia rule, hated America , supported jihad-martyrdom suicide bombing, and opposed equality of rights for women. Mogahed also defended Sharia on a British TV show.

With Brotherhood operatives in the American government and working closely with it, thanks to Barack Obama, it’s no surprise that he would have no problem with their being part of the Egyptian government too.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=41650
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 4 • Views: 9,065 • Replies: 243

 
eurocelticyankee
 
  3  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 02:50 am
What a Göebbels wannabe you are.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  0  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 07:32 am
@eurocelticyankee,
Gee, thanks for letting me know I'm getting through. I appreciate that.
eurocelticyankee
 
  2  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 11:32 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Göebbels would have laughed at your poor propaganda,
I assume you have heard the expression "Overkill".
Propaganda is meant to be subtle, we're not supposed to
notice it's propaganda, we're not supposed to see it coming.
You're like a freight train, lights blazing, horns blowing.
We can see you and your bias coming a mile away, makes
it meaningless.
Like I said a Göebbels wannabe, although why anybody would
want to be like that monster is beyond me.
You're welcome.
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 12:49 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
Rennie didn't write that--he doesn't have the talent--Rennie's talent is parroting hatred. Goebbels he's not. As evil as Goebbels was, Goebbels had a demented intelligence. Rennie is more of a 'useful idiot', a 'running dog' of the bigoted press.

Rap
eurocelticyankee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 01:11 pm
@raprap,
I didn't think he did write it Rap, I was just pointing out that
every post he makes is as predictable as a Chili Fart.
You really don't have to read it to know whats in it.
It's like a communal toilet at a rock concert, you can smell the crap a mile away.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 03:38 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
I figure this crowd needs to be bludgeoned. The odor around here reminds me of driving through the hog farm area of Iowa. The only difference is that the people who live there are much more intelligent than the indoctrinated lefties around here.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  0  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 03:41 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
Funny post. Nothing but rhetoric and personal crap. Anytime you think you have what it takes then take a point and defend it. Start a topic. Let's see what you've got.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 03:49 pm
Bookmark.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  4  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 04:13 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

I figure this crowd needs to be bludgeoned.
It only seems fitting you would resort to violence.
Quote:
The odor around here reminds me of driving through the hog farm area of Iowa.
You drove past a hog farm once? That's funny because I noticed you don't know the first thing about shoveling ****.
Quote:
The only difference is that the people who live there are much more intelligent than the indoctrinated lefties around here.
You never stopped at a hog farm did you?
I predict you won't get my meaning.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  0  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 04:21 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
I figure this crowd needs to be bludgeoned.

http://seerpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/US-Congress.jpg

i figure this crowd needs to be bludgeoned
0 Replies
 
eurocelticyankee
 
  4  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 04:36 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
If I have a point to make I'll make it, I wont labour the point
as you seem to enjoy doing.
You don't like President Obama, we get it.
If he cleared the national debt, hell! if achieved world peace,
you'd still find fault with him, we get it.
You'll fly in the face of reason, you're biased and selective with
your facts, there is no point in debating with you.
Like certain other members on A2K, you're right and everybody
who disagrees with you is wrong before debate has even started.
I think of you and them as ""The axis of bullshit".
Now theres an idea for a topic, should we impose sanctions on
---------------- "The axis of bullshit" --------------- Laughing
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 04:46 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
Not quite. I have no problem debating with anyone. You're the one who jumped on my post. If that is all you have then you're already in over your head. You made a wise decision. Here, I'll make it easy for you.

Explain to us how BO is going to be re-elected if unemployment is at 9%. I'm interested in that.
eurocelticyankee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 05:00 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
It's so easy for you to ignore the fact he inherited this mess
from 8 years of mismanagement by Bush & co.
The man is doing his best, which isn't always good enough, he's human,
to clean up the mess left to him by 8 years of Republican government.
But sure of course we'll ignore that, wont we?.
Whats your solution?. Put back in the same idiots who wrecked the
country in the first place.
Goodbye, RD. You go your way and I'll go mine.

Go "debate" with your fellow members of "The axis of bullshit".
(you know who you are) Laughing
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 05:06 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
Wow, that's original........"Obama inherited this mess"

Here's my question. Obama told us in 2008 that the stimulus was needed to keep unemployment under 8%. It is now June 2011. Unemployment was under 8% when he took over and it has been at or over 9% since then.

It's not working. We need to hope for a change.

eurocelticyankee
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 05:16 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Quote:
Wow, that's original........"Obama inherited this mess"


NO, RD it's quite simply TRUE.

Now goodbye.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 05:17 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
Thanks for you contribution. Invaluable.
eurocelticyankee
 
  2  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 05:20 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Truth hurts, I did point out you'd ignore it.

It doesn't take reams of bullshit to show it.
Your Welcome.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 06:13 pm
@eurocelticyankee,
Here's the truth. Obama told us we needed the stimulus to keep unemployment under 8%. It soon went over 8% and over 10%. It is now at 9%. When Bush left office unemployment was 7.5%. That is what Obama inherited.

Show me where I'm wrong.
parados
 
  3  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2011 06:57 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Random Renaldo Dubois quote

Are you really this thick?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama's Ties To The Christian Brotherhood
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/21/2021 at 02:25:13