coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:38 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Someone is promoting their news letter to idiots like cj.


Mr. Narrative. You people are the idiots.

And it is interesting how you arrogant people can't even call someone a real name. Emasculated sheep.
LvB
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:01 pm
What we have above is an interesting tactic employed by Mr Joint. When someone calls out his idiocy he automatically throws out some random claim. When asked to provide even a modicum of proof for his assertions, he defaults back into his negative name calling and character assassination, whilst conveniently forgetting to provide even a shred of unbiased and legitimate evidence.

This subject is a very complex little pumpkin.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:05 pm
@LvB,
Quote:
he defaults back into his negative name calling and character assassination


Hi troll. If you can read, he called me a name first. Perhaps he should work on illegally obtaining personal information and prank calls like you did at Amkon?
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:06 pm
@coldjoint,
I'm curious as to which position you take cj.

Do you think CPI is under reported as the source of the statistics you are claiming to be accurate postulates or do you think CPI is over reported as the GOP in congress claim when they want to change CPI reporting to save money by reducing the CPI increases when it comes SS payments? One can't take both positions.

Do you think SS payments should be 40% higher as Shadow Statistics claims on the link from the piece you posted?
0 Replies
 
LvB
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:09 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
perhaps he should work on illegally obtaining personal information and prank calls like you did at Amkon?


Once more, with feeling!

Quote:
When someone calls out his idiocy he automatically throws out some random claim. When asked to provide even a modicum of proof for his assertions, he defaults back into his negative name calling and character assassination, whilst conveniently forgetting to provide even a shred of unbiased and legitimate evidence.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:17 pm
Quote:
Obama’s State of the Union Speech Will Be All Lies


Same old.

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/01/21/obamas-state-of-the-union-speech-will-be-all-lies/
Quote:
Whatever Obama has to say about the Affordable Care Act—Obamacare—will be a lie. His administration continues to lie about the number of those who have enrolled, but we know they are mostly the elderly while the younger generation wisely avoids it.

We live in a nation where more than 90 million Americans are out of work, cannot find work, or have given up looking for work. Anything Obama has to say about the economy will be a lie.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:18 pm
@LvB,
Quote:
Once more, with feeling!


I guess I did a number on Amkon. Why are you here if I didn't? Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:41 pm
@coldjoint,
I'm still waiting for you to come up with one true fact to support your claim about illegal immigrants. You presented us with one that was clearly not factual and then went off on multiple tangents to avoid admitting you lied.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:45 pm
@parados,
Quote:
I'm still waiting


...for you to tell me why you believe a proven liar, like Obama.
LvB
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:51 pm
@coldjoint,
Mr deflection!
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 11:09 pm
@LvB,
Quote:
Mr deflection!


What are you doing? Are you going to deny Amkons criminal activities? I didn't think so.

I guess everyone did quit that scumbag forum. No one for you to talk to? Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 07:17 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
I'm still waiting


...for you to tell me why you believe a proven liar, like Obama.

So you think it is OK for you to lie because you say Obama did it? I didn't realize Obama was your role model.

You are like a 5 year old cj. You can't make a logical argument. Your attention span is short. You attempt to rationalize your lies by claiming someone else did it first.
panzade
 
  2  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 09:00 am
This reminds me of the bad ol' days of H2O. Why oh why do you guys have to keep quoting that pink feces. Can't you argue without the deference of a quote?
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  2  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 10:32 am
Paul Ryan- "Ha Ha ...it worked"
https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1546073_721991351152515_1060097262_n.jpg
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 10:43 am
@panzade,
panzade wrote:

Paul Ryan- Ha Ha ...it worked
https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1546073_721991351152515_1060097262_n.jpg


An absolute gem, Panzada...a GEM!

Thanks for it.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 11:27 am
@Frank Apisa,
On the other hand it might be that the wealth capture by the rich has happened primarily because technology is steadily removing the need and value of human workers, which would be the first time that technology did this, and politicians of all stripes are relatively powerless to do anything about it because of the ease of product and wealth transfer.

Blaming R's is easy and is also productive for some, but it might not be relevant to the actual problem.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 11:34 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

On the other hand it might be that the wealth capture by the rich has happened primarily because technology is steadily removing the need and value of human workers, which would be the first time that technology did this, and politicians of all stripes are relatively powerless to do anything about it because of the ease of product and wealth transfer.


As you know, Hawk...I have written extensively on this issue. Technology has made the value of human labor almost zero...and is primarily at fault.

That was not the focus of the picture and its caption.

And the captioned picture...IS A GEM.

Quote:
Blaming R's is easy and is also productive for some, but it might not be relevant to the actual problem.


I am not blaming them...and anyone who has read my essays about productivity and the decrease in value of human labor knows where I do put the blame.

But the picture was fun....at least for me.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 11:50 am
@Frank Apisa,
I have not seen such work. Do you have a link?
panzade
 
  2  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 11:54 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
because technology is steadily removing the need and value of human workers,

Nonsense.
The jobs have been shipped overseas by our captains of industry.
Another reason trickle-down doesn't work when you leave it in their hands
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 22 Jan, 2014 12:20 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

I have not seen such work. Do you have a link?


Sorry Hawk...I thought I put the entire series here in A2K...but I did not. I did put one piece (of what I posted in another forum) here...and it can be found at:

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/08/there_will_never_ever_again_be

It talks about the problems for human labor caused by our technology.

The other forum (Open Salon) where I post (haven't been there in over a year) has the entire series. If you would like to read it, I'd love to have your opinion. Here are the links in order:

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/08/there_will_never_ever_again_be

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/08/back_in_the_1950s

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/09/unemploymentproductivityrelated

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/10/is_unemployment_really_a_problem

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/11/so_who_is_in_favor_of_more_leisure_time_for_everybody

http://open.salon.com/blog/frank_apisa/2008/12/12/readers_digest_version--the_end_of_the_series


That first one, by the way, begins with:

There will never, ever again, be enough quality jobs (read that: high-paying jobs) available for all the people who need and/or want one. Never, ever again. Not in our country—nor anywhere else in the world. Free market dynamics will not produce them—nor will any president, congress, or legislative agenda either. The days when it makes sense to pay humans a living wage to do things that machines, robots, and computers can do more efficiently—at a higher rate of productivity—AND AT LESS COST (which includes the vast preponderance of all medium skill manufacturing jobs) are over. They are a thing of the past and will NEVER return.

(Which is right on point with what you were saying!)



0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 03:52:18