coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 20 Jan, 2014 11:08 pm
@LvB,
Quote:
Ahh Christ... The pink imbecile is back.

And so is the criminal from Amkon.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:07 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Why is America Funding Food Stamp Ads in Mexico?


Buying votes south of the border

http://americanglob.com/2014/01/16/why-is-america-funding-food-stamp-ads-in-mexico/

Pink seems to mean your statement is a lie.

There are no ads in Mexico for food stamps. President Bush in 2004 started a program where they met with Mexican consulates in the US to promote SNAP for legal residents in the US. Somehow this has turned into ads in Mexico by the deluded.

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/is_obama_giving_food_stamps_to_mexicans/
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:42 am
@parados,
Quote:
The long answer is that the program was actually started by Bush


That from your link. Bush started a lot of programs Obama now controls. Or is Bush still president. The fact is welfare buys votes.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 10:48 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
The long answer is that the program was actually started by Bush


That from your link. Bush started a lot of programs Obama now controls. Or is Bush still president. The fact is welfare buys votes.


Obviously not yours.

And "throwing the poor under the bus" buys a few votes from people like you...so it all evens out. Right?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 11:11 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
The long answer is that the program was actually started by Bush


That from your link. Bush started a lot of programs Obama now controls. Or is Bush still president. The fact is welfare buys votes.

Bush started a program that Obama now controls that has NOTHING to do with ads in Mexico.

If you can't live in reality, then keep using the pink.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 11:46 am
@parados,
Quote:
Bush started a program that Obama now controls that has NOTHING to do with ads in Mexico.


It is a government program. This administration controls those programs. You won't accept the fact that Democrats want a welfare state.
panzade
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 02:30 pm
https://scontent-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/155421_575529572540101_38975943_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 02:43 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Bush started a program that Obama now controls that has NOTHING to do with ads in Mexico.


It is a government program. This administration controls those programs. You won't accept the fact that Democrats want a welfare state.

And you won't admit that your lie has been exposed so now you are trying to change the subject.

FACT - You claimed ads were being run in Mexico
FACT - Your claim was a lie.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 02:50 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Bush started a program that Obama now controls that has NOTHING to do with ads in Mexico.


It is a government program. This administration controls those programs. You won't accept the fact that Democrats want a welfare state.

And you won't admit that your lie has been exposed so now you are trying to change the subject.

FACT - You claimed ads were being run in Mexico
FACT - Your claim was a lie.


Well, Parados, in fairness to coldjoint...

...it might not have been a lie. It might just have been another stupid mistake.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 07:03 pm
@parados,
Quote:
And you won't admit that your lie has been exposed so now you are trying to change the subject.

What I am trying to say is that this administration encourages illegal immigration and is buying future votes. It is plainly their agenda.
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 07:37 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
And you won't admit that your lie has been exposed so now you are trying to change the subject.

What I am trying to say is that this administration encourages illegal immigration and is buying future votes. It is plainly their agenda.

If that's what you were trying to say then why did you say something that was a lie to support it? Wouldn't the truth work better to support your claim?
Or maybe you don't have any facts to support it so you hope no one will notice you are only lying.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 08:16 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Or maybe you don't have any facts to support it so you hope no one will notice you are only lying.


What am I lying about? Are you saying more proof is needed that Obama is a liar, and his agenda has nothing to do with improving America. The dots can't be connected when evidence is suppressed. And he has used executive privilege, and the DOJ, and the IRS to silence and block information necessary for over-site.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 08:36 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
What I am trying to say is that this administration encourages illegal immigration and is buying future votes. It is plainly their agenda.
they do what ever they want to do, regardless of what the law says or what Congress wants to do, and then they dare the courts to stop them. We are looking at the further breakdown of law and order. Team Obama rewriting the insurance industry welfare program ("risk corridors") that was written into ObamaCare because they have decided that they dont like this part of the law is just one act in this general lawlessness.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 08:49 pm
@hawkeye10,
No proof of that is needed. It is painfully obvious except to the sheep.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:21 pm
@coldjoint,
You posted that ads for the US SNAP program were airing in Mexico. That is a lie. No such thing is happening. Trying to change the subject won't make your lie go away.
I'm curious what you think exec privilege, the DOJ and the IRS have to do with your claim that Obama supports illegal immigration. Nothing to support your original argument so you are simply throwing out other **** without any facts hoping no one notices you have no facts.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:21 pm
Quote:
Wall Street advisor’s memo to clients reveals actual unemployment rate. David John Marotta says the unemployment rate is 37.2%, not the 6.7% advertised by the government and the Misery Index is over 14, not the 8 claimed by the government. But don’t worry, you can trust the government not to misuse that NSA database.


http://www.ihatethemedia.com/wall-street-advisor-reveals-actual-unemployment-rate?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ihatethemedia+%28I+Hate+the+Media%29

parados
 
  2  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:22 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Team Obama rewriting the insurance industry welfare program ("risk corridors") that was written into ObamaCare because they have decided that they dont like this part of the law is just one act in this general lawlessness.

Care to provide a link to support that statement hawk?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:29 pm
@coldjoint,
Would you look at that? Someone is promoting their news letter to idiots like cj.
You better buy gold and guns cj because the US doesn't exist after tomorrow with that idiot's argument.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:30 pm
@parados,
Just like the Daily Kos, huh?
parados
 
  3  
Tue 21 Jan, 2014 09:35 pm
@coldjoint,
Daily Kos sells a news letter? Care to provide a link?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 10:43:49