@Irishk,
Quote:A man has been accused of a serious crime
disputed
very rapidly on nothing but the say so of one person
after unreasonable delay, and at unreasonable cost the the accused of 6 million dollars bail and at a cost to him of $280 a hour for his house arrest...not including the house of course.
Quote:A grand jury, after hearing testimony from the accuser, has indicted him
a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich, so that is irrelavant
Quote:If there is a trial,
Possibly, but that is very rare in the American system
Quote:it's up to the prosecutor to prove guilt
totally false, the accused needs to prove that his accuser is lying, if he can not he is guilty according to the law.
Quote:it's not up to the accused to prove his innocence
according to the Constitution you should be correct, and in any other part of the law besides sex law you would be correct
Quote:If it can't be proven that he did it, he'll be let go
completely wrong, see above
Quote: If there's evidence that he did it beyond a reasonable doubt, he'll be fined and/or sentenced just like any other criminal.
there is almost certainly going to be no evidence provided towards consent, either way the decision of the jury will be subjective only.
Quote:Not all that complicated.
we are trying to judge an event in human relationship, and given that humans are complicated rendering such judgments is also complicated.