@hawkeye10,
You two or three have already made up your minds that she's a) part of a conspiracy to entrap him and/or b) a ready-made victim out to make $$$$$ off him - in both cases, he's innocent and she's guilty.
He has also, according to you two, been convicted in the press because of the perp walk, even though every single criminal I've ever seen on tv has been in handcuffs, which means it's usual behaviour, nothing out of the norm, but you two feel that in his case it's a persecution. You have also defended him as saying he was probably just 'playing' and it wasn't a rape at all.
As for me, I haven't made up my mind - I'm going on what's been put out there, like everybody else except you two. So far, the facts are:
1. He has a long reputation for hitting on women.... sometimes against their wishes.
2. The maid, who works alone, knocked on the door, heard nothing, entered it to clean.
3. He exited from the shower, naked, and proceeded to chase her. He then forced her to perform oral sex on her (after not being able to get her pantyhose off) against her will.
Enough said. If she resisted having her pantyhose removed, my first thought is "She doesn't want to do this". So, it's a forcible sex crime in my mind.
There very well could be some details in the near future that will affect how I view this, but at this point, this is what I'm going on.