Tax the rich!

@parados,

David wrote:

This demonstrates how socialism is the filosofy of the ROBBER.

Maybe that 's Y Jesus advised: if u don 't have a sword, u better buy one. Luke 22:36

parados wrote:

Actually, it demonstrates how people with money should be willing to spend more money
to keep their money since they have more to lose.

Well, that 's the reason for spending on the accumulation of competent defensive ordnance.

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

David wrote:
This demonstrates how socialism is the filosofy of the ROBBER.

Maybe that 's Y Jesus advised: if u don 't have a sword, u better buy one. Luke 22:36
parados wrote:
Actually, it demonstrates how people with money should be willing to spend more money
to keep their money since they have more to lose.

Well, that 's the reason for spending on the accumulation of competent defensive ordnance.

David

There is no defensive ordinance that can save you from an enraged populace - or even just one person. If someone was determined to do damage to your personage, you would be unable to stop them from doing so.

Cycloptichorn

2 Replies

@Cycloptichorn,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

David wrote:
This demonstrates how socialism is the filosofy of the ROBBER.

Maybe that 's Y Jesus advised: if u don 't have a sword, u better buy one. Luke 22:36
parados wrote:
Actually, it demonstrates how people with money should be willing to spend more money
to keep their money since they have more to lose.

Well, that 's the reason for spending on the accumulation of competent defensive ordnance.

David

Cycloptichorn wrote:

There is no defensive ordinance that can save you from an enraged populace - or even just one person. If someone was determined to do damage to your personage, you would be unable to stop them from doing so.

Cycloptichorn

That might be true,
but u might mitigate the odds somewhat.

If u find out about it in time,
a pre-emptive removal might be possible.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

David wrote:
This demonstrates how socialism is the filosofy of the ROBBER.

Maybe that 's Y Jesus advised: if u don 't have a sword, u better buy one. Luke 22:36
parados wrote:
Actually, it demonstrates how people with money should be willing to spend more money
to keep their money since they have more to lose.

Well, that 's the reason for spending on the accumulation of competent defensive ordnance.

David

Cycloptichorn wrote:
There is no defensive ordinance that can save you from an enraged populace - or even just one person. If someone was determined to do damage to your personage, you would be unable to stop them from doing so.

Cycloptichorn

That might be true,
but u might mitigate the odds somewhat.

If u find out about it in time,
a pre-emptive removal might be possible.

David

You can't count on that in the slightest. Especially if someone puts about, oh, one minute of thought into the enterprise.

The entire point is that it's better to keep people happy enough so they don't decide to kill you, than it is to keep them unhappy and roll the dice on the ability to defend yourself.

Cycloptichorn

1 Reply

@Cycloptichorn,

Cycloptichorn wrote:

There is no defensive ordinance that can save you from an enraged populace - or even just one person.
If someone was determined to do damage to your personage, you would be unable to stop them from doing so.

Cyclotroll, that is a fatal assumption on your part.

0 Replies

72% favor raising taxes on the rich vs. 52% who strongly oppose cutting medicaid and 65% strongly oppose cuts on medicare

1 Reply

@revelette,

You poll 100% of the moocher class and only 72% of them support Obama's efforts to ruin this country... PrezBO's support is on a slide south Cool

1 Reply

@Cycloptichorn,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

David wrote:
This demonstrates how socialism is the filosofy of the ROBBER.

Maybe that 's Y Jesus advised: if u don 't have a sword, u better buy one. Luke 22:36
parados wrote:
Actually, it demonstrates how people with money should be willing to spend more money
to keep their money since they have more to lose.

Well, that 's the reason for spending on the accumulation of competent defensive ordnance.

David

Cycloptichorn wrote:
There is no defensive ordinance that can save you from an enraged populace - or even just one person. If someone was determined to do damage to your personage, you would be unable to stop them from doing so.

Cycloptichorn

That might be true,
but u might mitigate the odds somewhat.

If u find out about it in time,
a pre-emptive removal might be possible.

David

Cycloptichorn wrote:

You can't count on that in the slightest. Especially if someone puts about, oh, one minute of thought into the enterprise.

The entire point is that it's better to keep people happy enough so they don't decide to kill you, than it is to keep them unhappy and roll the dice on the ability to defend yourself.

Cycloptichorn

That 's a COWARDLY way to live your life.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Bingo!

Cyclotroll is a coward.

0 Replies

@H2O MAN,

H2O MAN wrote:

A vote for Barry in 2012 is a vote for a Marxist America

So don't vote for him...

Look; who cares what the economy is so long as the economy supports the people rather than the people having to support the economy??? Who cares what the economy is so long as government can function to do what governments should do without having big business steer the course, serve business, rob the national treasury, steal the commonwealth, get us into wars and deny to citizens their rights??? I don't care what you call your economy, but it should be an economy instead of a mad house... It does mean: House management, in the Greek... Where is the management???

0 Replies

@H2O MAN,

H2O MAN wrote:

Can a borrow one of your crayons?
Pick your favorite color and I color you all over.

Just color him black to justify your hate...

0 Replies

@H2O MAN,

In another national poll with questions to all groups including tea parties, 45% of the tea party support taxing the rich. Only 28% of the tea party support cuts to medicare and medicaid.

McClatchy-Marist Poll
National Survey
April 18, 2011

0 Replies

There shoud be a LIFETIME MAXIMUM tax for the rich,
such that after anyone (including the poor) has paid $1,000,000,
no more tax will ever be expected of him again, no matter WHAT.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

There shoud be a LIFETIME MAXIMUM tax for the rich,
such that after anyone (including the poor) has paid $1,000,000,
no more tax will ever be expected of him again, no matter WHAT.

David

If I could find your brain and cut it out and lay in on a butter knife it would look like a beebee on an eight lane highway...

When I was a kid you could buy a box of candy bars for a buck, but in that time between then and now think of all the people on fixed incomes robbed simply because of inflation which the government could control if it did not find some benefit in stealing from those least able to defend themselves??? It is with money and monatary policy, along with taxes and tax policy that the vast number of people are robbed and have been robbed so that those least able to bear the cost of government and who least benefit are charged with the cost of government... You say tax them a million and be done... If that were possible, and they would consent, then as it stands they would tomorrow make a dollar the equal of a million and raise all prices accordingly, and your millions would soon have no greater value in terms of goods, but their taxes would be paid forever...

If; on the other hand you let people pay the tax demanded on their support of what the taxes were paid to support, you migh find wars and capital punishment ended tomorrow... You might find abortion supported and social programs too... You might find an EPA and a food and drug administration with teeth... You might find about half the laws strickened from the books and the Supreme Court and FBI without funds... I would say sure: I'll pay taxes; but not without the right to help decide the course of government without the parties interference..

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

We shoud have remained on the GOLD standard.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

We shoud have remained on the GOLD standard.

David

There was a republican choice for you, and the world did not fall in; and in fact, it is one way that we beat the communists since they cannot play funny with economies always living hand to mouth... We can say what the money means, and if others agree, then that is what the money means... But if you look at it, it is not the poor people who are robbing the meaning out of money for until they run out of money the money will have some meaning... But when the rich have the whole country, and they own the government, and they hold all the money it becomes a form of social suicide to the poor to keep valuing what the rich possess.... Money like every other form must be shared to have meaning, and when it is no longer shared it, the form of it will be once agains paper... That paper to date has been the means of stealing the country from beneath our feet... Because of the national debt which is not our debt, from which we did not benefit, soon the rich will say that we must take less for our labor, and pay more for the goods we consume, or simply suffer mass devaluation of the currency... The rich will get to keep what they own, but we who own nothing must suffer...

0 Replies

The rich are paying dramaticallly less tax. See http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/17/super-rich-see-federal-taxes-drop-dramatically/

0 Replies

The left is paying far less attention than we thought.

1 Reply

@H2O MAN,

H2O MAN wrote:

The left is paying far less attention than we thought.

If that is true it is because when anyone's particular party has control of the White House, they tend to let down their guard... I think it is a mistake, but it is outrageous that we must devote do much time to politics when primitive peoples did not devote so much time to their own governments when they were direct, and their lives depended upon their government working.... Half of us are gived up, and the other half are riveted at attention, not daring to take their eyes of the crooks in power or out.. I think it is terrible, and the fact that we must do it when it gains us so little, and do so even after putting in hard days at work is a sign of how rotton the system is... No wonder people surrender, say their prayers and hope for the best... They know they are desparate... They simply see no hope in their despair but the hope of the doomed.

0 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know