@aidan,
David wrote:(I HOPE that my abhorrence of government and of collectivism is being successfully expressed.)
aidan wrote:Yes, I've been aware of that for quite some time now -
THAT 's a relief.
aidan wrote:along with the fact that nobody ever thinks schools can do anything right - or even want to -
I have never believed
that,
but we shoud repremand government for its mistakes,
especially those against Individual freedom.
THAT is a matter of
principle.
aidan wrote:in other words people seem to think they're run by assholes
who never have anything approaching positive motives about anything.
I disagree; I have never thawt of teachers that way.
aidan wrote:The graduation IS about the school - you know?
David wrote:BULLONEY!!! The graduation is about the Individual students.
A public school is their mere property, like their shoes.
aidan wrote:Really - then why don't they have it in the girl's bedroom?
Then she wouldn't have to get dressed at all.
I know not their policy qua naked graduations.
Maybe thay wanna be together with the other Individual graduates,
in a celebratory spirit.
I dunno. The only 2 graduations that I attended were from Junior High School
(because I was out-of-my-mind-in-
Love with a graduating young lady named Joyce)
and my law school graduation.
I did not bother with my senior high school graduation
(to sit out there in the heat, while the principal ran his mouth;
I had little interest in his opinions and thay distributed a diploma
only to
1 (count him:
1) representative of the class.
The same story with my graduation from college.
Thay had some underwhelming leftist commencement speaker;
not worth attending.
I think thay mailed me my degree.
aidan wrote:I had to look at that phonetic twice to figure out what sound you wanted me to make David.
Maybe it's a NJ thing but I would say BA-Lone-y not BULL-0-ney.
I amended it,
to reflect a play on words (like
BULLoney)
in reference to matter of bovine origin devoid of value.
aidan wrote:If you have no respect for the traditions of the institution - don't take part in them. Simple as that.
David wrote:No; that does not optimally serve their best interests as Individuals,
and toward OTHER Individuals who follow in their footsteps.
The collective is dangerous and we need to take care to subdue it,
like a recalcitrant dog.
That is where the citizens of Russia and Germany went rong last century.
aidan wrote:Okay - so is there no institution or tradition in which you take enough
pride or respect enough to follow their rules and dress code?
I don't wanna go as far as to say
NONE,
but qua mere schools (public) it is of more value
to please the graduating citizens who
OWN the place,
than it is to please a mere
government.
We shoud all look down upon government, in an
anti-collectivist spirit.
aidan wrote:How about when you were in court? Did you wear a suit?
Yes; I always wore 3 piece suits, of identical sartorial architecture.
I dressed the same wherever I went.
aidan wrote:How about if you'd had to sit on the bench as a judge?
Would you have worn the robe?
Yes; some judges wore them; not all.
Robes come in handy in effecting settlements; functional,
thereby avoiding trials and writing decisions.
aidan wrote:And I will tell you, having a daughter this age
and seeing her friends - there is a lot of personal 'it's all about me'
arrogance around this.
To which David replied:
Quote:Hooray!!! That is how it shoud be
NOT as I quoted Adolf Hitler b4 hereinabove:
"authority from the top down,
obedience from the bottom up."
(Hitler was a collectivist; Individualism was anathema to him and he said so.)
Again, I exhort a consumate rejection of nazi filosofy,
reversing it, and turning it upside down,
in favor of the INDIVIDUAL subduing the collective
and its henchman: government.
Quote:aidan wrote:
She probably thinks she'll look better in her facebook pictures if she wears her 'classy' white pantsuit.
To which David replied:
Quote:Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
The opinion of the school personnel is inferior to hers,
in that thay r merely her employees.
aidan wrote:It's not their opinion. It is their policy and tradition. And they are sponsoring the event.
I 'm trying to make the point
that government shoud be dragged down in dignity,
below those who created the damned thing: the citizens.
History proves that it is too DANGEROUS to look UP to government.
That gives it haughty ideas,
forgetting that
sovereignty is in the citizens
NOT in the damned government.
aidan wrote:And David - you have no idea what you're saying.
You're a ******* arbiter of rules and enforcing them.
David wrote:That depends on the legitimacy of the rules; not enuf ******* going on, tho.
aidan wrote:You don't think so?
Yes, I don 't; not enuf.
David wrote:Which ones do u have in mind ?
aidan wrote:Look, it's all very well and good to say - 'Oh yeah - people gotta be free.
Yeah; that 's good.
aidan wrote:No one should ever be told what to do and what not to do - especially in those crummy schools.
But where do you think children are first conditioned to accept that
sometimes certain standards of behavior, when it comes to dress,
manners, citizenship, etc. will enable them to function more
smoothly in the world- outside the unique and perhaps misbegotten
behaviors of their family?
Just
TELL them, if u want them to know. Maybe thay 'll agree; who knows ?
aidan wrote:It's at school. When the bell rings - you gotta be in your seat.
NO. Government was not created for the purpose
of
DISCIPLINING the citizens, as if thay (who created the damned thing) were
BELOW the government.
Will u show me any government in America
at whose creation, it said:
"Please create me, legitimize me
and I 'll
CRACK THE WHIP over u! I 'll show
u who is boss!"
aidan wrote:Just as twenty years later, when the boss says, 'Work starts at 8:00,' you gotta be at your desk.
The difference is
LEGITIMACY.
When thay applied for employment,
that is what thay were selling in exchange for their pay;
NOT so the citizens who were students;
how much did
THAY get paid to be on time ??????
aidan wrote:Maybe they see their moms/dads calling in sick or showing up late for work.
Maybe they'd think that's the way it is for everyone. But then they go to school
and certain disciplines are enforced on everyone.
Enforced only by
USURPATION; how did that government acquire
jurisdiction to shove those citizens around?????
Did those citizens
AGREE to that? I don 't think thay did.
(Remember that
legitimacy of government is in
CONSENT of the governed?)
aidan wrote:And they see the efficacy in these standard and traditions so that later,
when the law says, 'You cannot litter,' even though it's easier to throw
something on the ground instead of walking over to the trash can- they're conditioned to cooperate.
I deny,
dispute and challenge the concept that government was ever granted jd
to
psychologically condition the citizens who created it; bad enuf that thay put flouride in the water.
It can do so only by a fraudulent USURPATION of
ultra vires fake authority.
Thay shoud be tarred n feathered for it.
aidan wrote:I don't think cooperation and adaptivity and yes, taking other's wishes into account is a bad thing.
And why rebel just to rebel?
Its
good to keep government humble, weak, starved and inoffensive.
aidan wrote:If her purpose is to look good, as stated, she'd look prettier with her legs showing without the pants.
They look like pajama bottoms.
WE shoud tell the government how to dress,
not the other way around. The tail shoud not wag the dog.
aidan wrote:You're gonna try to tell me that there's no value in respecting tradition and following rules?
David wrote:That depends on the logical merit of the individual tradition or rule under consideration; e.g., there is no value
in following the traditional rule of adding the letters UGH to the word tho, nor in jabbing Ls into the words woud,
coud nor shoud; there r many other examples,
e.g. fathers deciding whom their daughters shoud marry.
What if YOUR father told u to follow tradition
in letting him choose a husband for u and to follow his rules about that??
aidan wrote:David - I'm American, not British and not titled.
My father choosing whom I marry is not a tradition in my culture.
And yeah - if we were talking about a life-altering decision that would have bearing on the rest of my life, I might break with tradition.
But this girl just wants to wear the pants she wants to wear for one hour instead of the pants the school wants her to wear.
Maybe they should throw the whole graduation ceremony out the window. Yeah - let the kids organize, find a place to have it, make all the arrangements, find a space for it, chairs for everyone to sit in, etc....then yeah - they could wear whatever they want.
I think that's a great solution.
SO STIPULATED. I ignored mine, or half of them; the "proms" too.
aidan wrote:That's what I'd say if I were the principal of that school.
Ya'll who want to wear pajama pants - have your own ceremony.
MY ceremony consisted of relaxing in the comfort of my home.
I saw no reason to go over there.
Quote:aidan wrote:
And this sort of 'me is most important' attitude spills over into everything.
Quote:THANK GOODNESS! That is the natural way to vu things.
Let everyone join in anti-collectivism.
aidan wrote:
Yes - DIS-organize. Let's see how well the trash gets collected off the streets then!
It's a very romantic idea David. But you might not be happy with the practical applications and results.
Maybe.
Quote:aidan wrote:
So, how about deadlines? What if the professor at college says,
'This paper is due so and so' and this girl says,
'Well, I want to hand it in on my own time in my own way- stop trying to control me - as long
as I learn the material don't tell me what to do. Is that alright too?
Well, what is important is that the student
LEARNS the information,
NOT the speed of learning.
Einstein got a Prize for being
GOOD,
not for being
FAST.
David wrote:Yes; ADMIRABLE!!!
That 's good practice for true Americanism.
Its the same as if she hired a tutor who subsequently got uppity n disrespectful of his employer.
She shoud add a disciplinary remark to keep him humble,
embarrass him a little, if he is bossy
e.g.: "I put the socks on your feet, Mister; don 't forget who is paying u."
Yeah - lets' teach people to be disrespectful to others as well as we disorganize the world.
Quote:aidan wrote:
Give me a break. This girl can strip naked and run around the track if she wants to.
David wrote:Well, if it is public property
and if she is a citizen, then she is entitled.
As long as she does not violate anyone's rights, I see no harm in that.
That is the criterion.
aidan wrote:I agree - she needs to learn to take the consequences of her stances.
Quote:aidan wrote:
She'll just have to take the consequences.
Let her wear her white pantsuit.
She'll have to take the consequences - maybe they won't let her
participate in the traditional graduation ceremony.
Quote:Keepin her OUT
of her own property????
What if someone keeps U out of YOUR own property????
aidan wrote:As far as I understand it, it's only my property during school hours.
O, really? To whom does it belong thereafter ?
aidan wrote:They're allowing me to take part in a ceremony they're providing me outside of school hours.
They don't have to make their facility available - they are.
Have u lost sight of the fact that
the citizens OWN
the government??? (in America)
Quote:aidan wrote:
Oh well...she got to look damn good in her classy white pantsuit.
Quote:That actually HAPPENED,
to a girl who was joining the US Army.
She posed in Army fatigues on an M1 Abrams battle tank,
under its 12Omm cannon,
and gave the picture to the Yearbook people.
In revenge, her employees, the administration
of the school kept her out of her graduation,
in furtherance of their zero tolerance anti-gun policy.
aidan wrote:
Listen - schools are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Thay shoud have left her the hell alone.
aidan wrote:Everyone wants everyone elses children to be held to certain standards of behavior,
but they want their own kids to be able to do whatever the hell they want.
It doesn't work that way.
Quote:aidan wrote:
And this is not the sort of girl who changed the world for me.
As Ms. Olga states - those women were spending their time and effort on more important things
.
David wrote:
Quote:Nothing is more important than the citizens keeping government in subjection.
When the monster gets loose from his slab in the lab,
Dr. Frankenstein is in trouble, and woe unto the townsfolk.
aidan wrote:That's not what this is about. This is about her.
It is about freedom of the Individual citizen,
who needs to fight back against government
and keep the damned thing humble,
the same way that u shoud not let your dog snap at u
nor rip up your furniture, if u don 't want him to.
It is important to show
WHO the boss is,
or government will get uppitty ideas; that already happened.
David