26
   

Will the Republicans blame Obama for the earthquake?

 
 
saab
 
  2  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 07:59 am
@Eorl,
The reply was ment for BumbleBeeBoogie who started this and not for you, but I think your apoligise is a very nice thing.

0 Replies
 
Fido
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:33 am
@Sturgis,
Why not try to get just a little bit real... To notice that the reactionaries are forever putting labels on everyone, objectifying everyone, and drawing lines in the sand, making accusations the liberals are then forced to deny which is a terrible disadvantage is what is creating the divide... You want to accuse BBB of deepening it??? It already goes all the way to the bone... Aristotle said that the line between vice and virtue is one that divides all of mankind... It divides us here as well... The republicans simply do not give a **** who suffers injustice or if they divide us so much that we are weakened and defeated... Half of them are idiots because they want to let God run the country which is the opposite of what government should do, which is to use the mind, the common mind, the best mind, and act upon reason... The other part of the republicans are acting out of a narrow and perverted view of self interest which puts them at odds with all of humanity and what America should stand for... So Don't blame BBB for seeing the obvious that is obvious to all but the ones spewing the garbage about Obama... It is just par for the course, what Repubicans do because in destroying the civility of government they injure the power of government to do what government should do, which is: Good...
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:11 am
@Fido,
I think BBB is simply making a comment on the nature of current discourse.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:48 am
@plainoldme,
You would be wrong in your thinking.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 11:01 am
@dyslexia,
C'est dommage.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 12:10 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Blaming presidents for natural disasters is #1 on the Democrat playlist. Wrong party.
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 02:01 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Blaming presidents for natural disasters is #1 on the Democrat playlist. Wrong party.
Wars and depressions are not natural disasters, but they are disasters the way republicans manage them...
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 05:19 pm
@Fido,
NO and LA were managed by Democrats during Katrina.
edgarblythe
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 05:44 pm
@Lash,
Yeah, like Bush, for instance, a real Democrat.
scorpiorising
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 06:47 pm
@Sturgis,
Did the Democrats blame Katrina on Bush?

But seriously. We now have a President who plays golf and parties with reporters when Japan is on the brink of a nuclear meltdown. And not one criticism from the media.
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:31 pm
@edgarblythe,
Bush can't micromanage everything that happens. The Louisiana government was responsible for the details. They blew it.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:36 pm
@Lash,
F.E.M.A.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:39 pm
@scorpiorising,
scorpiorising wrote:
Did the Democrats blame Katrina on Bush?

But seriously. We now have a President who plays golf
and parties with reporters when Japan is on the brink of a nuclear meltdown. And not one criticism from the media.
I voted against obama,
and I will again, but in fairness:
that is not an American problem.

When we had trouble with 3 Mile Island,
we did not expect the Japs to show up over here.





David
Lash
 
  3  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:42 pm
@dyslexia,
A president trusts the people in charge of FEMA or whatever agency to do their job. As I remember, Bush patted the head of "Brownie," who may or may not have been doing a good job despite the crap going on in LA and NO government. None of us know the details on how the mistakes of the NO mayor and the LA governor affected FEMA's ability to bring aid in a timely manner.

It's so very easy to criticize - especially when it serves our purpose. Even if FEMA did add to the nightmare of errors, we know Nagin and Blanco fumbled their responsibility horribly. Maybe "Brownie" did, too. Blaming Bush, however, is just politically expedient for the peanut gallery.
Ceili
 
  6  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:42 pm
Seriously, how did two natural disasters, a possible nuclear meltdown and possibly over 10,000 dead in Japan become about the American two party system and the inane bickering of the self centred. This is a stupid thread.
dyslexia
 
  2  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 08:50 pm
@Lash,
presentation is often the meat and potatoes of politics, Bush screwed the pooch re NO. history will note Bush/Brownie, not Nagin, Blanco. WMD same boat regardless of Rumsfeld re-writing history. At this point in time historical facts won't obscure image or presentation.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:08 pm
@Ceili,
Then why are you here?
Ceili
 
  3  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:24 pm
@georgeob1,
To give a bit of perspective, too subtle for you eh!
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 10:41 pm
@Ceili,
Not really.
roger
 
  4  
Reply Sun 13 Mar, 2011 11:50 pm
@Ceili,
Good. It could stand a bit of perspective.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 12:15:29