6
   

Two men robbed his house last night.

 
 
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2011 12:31 pm
Two men robbed his house last night.

Is the above sentence correct? I wonder if a house can be robbed.

Thanks.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 6 • Views: 2,612 • Replies: 26

 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:13 pm
Yes, it is correct. Although it may seem slightly nonsensical, English speakers will refer to a place being robbed. "A tall, dark man robbed that store yesterday."
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  2  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:27 pm
@tanguatlay,
Well, strictly speaking, a house cannot be robbed -- it can be burglarized.

At common law, "robbery" is the taking and carrying away of the property of another, from his/her person or presence, with intent to steal, by force or by threat of force.

Burglary involves breaking and entering into the house of another (at night) with the intent to commit a felony in that house.
Old Goat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:33 pm
Burglarized?

Do you mean burgled?
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2011 02:26 pm
@Ticomaya,
The member was asking a question about English usage, not the arcana of anal-retentive lawyer wannabes . . .
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Feb, 2011 02:27 pm
I've always liked burgoo . . .
0 Replies
 
Old Goat
 
  3  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 02:46 am
If the thief sounds reveille just as he's leaving with his booty, have you just been bugled?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 03:16 am
@tanguatlay,

Quote:
Two men robbed his house last night.

Is the above sentence correct? I wonder if a house can be robbed.


Tangu, you are a smart man. Or maybe you're a woman. Not many native English speakers would bother to make that distinction, or even recognise it, but you're right.

The man was robbed. His house was burgled.
tanguatlay
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 05:19 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Quote:

Tangu, you are a smart man. Or maybe you're a woman. Not many native English speakers would bother to make that distinction, or even recognise it, but you're right.

The man was robbed. His house was burgled.
I am a woman.
0 Replies
 
tanguatlay
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 05:20 am
@Old Goat,
Old Goat wrote:

Burglarized?

Do you mean burgled?
I believe 'burglarized' is AmE. 'Burgled' is BrE.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 05:38 am
@tanguatlay,
I believe you are correct . . . and i'm not all that gullible . . .
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 03:33 pm
@Ticomaya,
Quote:
Well, strictly speaking, a house cannot be robbed -- it can be burglarized.


Strictly speaking, a house can be robbed, just as a store can open and close, seemingly by itself at certain times of the day.

What Tico meant was "legally speaking", blah blah blah .

Two men robbed his house of [something(s)] last night.



0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 08:38 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
The member was asking a question about English usage, not the arcana of anal-retentive lawyer wannabes . . .

She was asking whether a house could be robbed. I gave her correct information.

Dumbass.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 09:06 pm
@Ticomaya,
Quote:
She was asking whether a house could be robbed. I gave her correct information.


You gave her misleading information, Tico, not correct information.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Feb, 2011 02:08 pm
@Ticomaya,
No, you didn't, because a house can be robbed, and that is English usage--**** for brains.
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Feb, 2011 06:39 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
No, you didn't, because a house can be robbed, and that is English usage--**** for brains.

In what sense can a house be robbed? It can't be. Or are you saying it's colloquial, and that at some point because a great many people who do not know any better incorrectly refer to a house being robbed, it suddenly becomes correct usage?

Twit.

JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Feb, 2011 09:03 pm
@Ticomaya,
Quote:
In what sense can a house be robbed? It can't be. Or are you saying it's colloquial, and that at some point because a great many people who do not know any better incorrectly refer to a house being robbed, it suddenly becomes correct usage?


In all likelihood, Tico, you've been saying all your life, at least until you became a rule thumpin' pedant, that such and such a bank was robbed. English even has bank robbers; these are people who rob banks.

Two men robbed my bank yesterday.

Sounds completely reasonable, does it not?

If a bank can be robbed, then there's no conceivably reason that, in the same sense, the same can happen to a house.

Those great many people who you seek to malign are the ones who have it correct and you, Tico, are mistaken. And don't forget, you too, everyone, actually, speaks colloquial English.

In this instance, glory be, the "Twit" is right.
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Feb, 2011 08:21 am
@JTT,

Quote:
English even has bank robbers; these are people who rob banks.
Two men robbed my bank yesterday.
Sounds completely reasonable, does it not?


No. (though I shrink from pointing this out, lest I be thought boorish.)

The bank owns the money which was stolen.

The house (which was burgled/ burglarised) does not own the goods which were stolen.

That's why you can rob a bank, but not (strictly speaking, and what's wrong with that) a house.
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Feb, 2011 08:24 am
@Ticomaya,
I am saying, fuckwsit, that customary usage over time and broadly used does indeed trump the arcana of anal-retentive lawyer wannabes, which is what i've said all along. Jackass.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Feb, 2011 12:32 pm
@McTag,
Quote:
No. (though I shrink from pointing this out, lest I be thought boorish.)

The bank owns the money which was stolen.

The house (which was burgled/ burglarised) does not own the goods which were stolen.

That's why you can rob a bank, but not (strictly speaking, and what's wrong with that) a house.


Not boorish in this case, just wrong, McTag.

You don't speak strictly. You take all manner of unstrict choices with the English you use. I just took one there. Certain fields, like law, medicine, engineering do use language in a stricter fashion, and then you whine and kvetch about them creating language specific to their fields.

The store was robbed.

The ice cream stand was robbed.

The shop was robbed.

The wholesaler was robbed.

 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Two men robbed his house last night.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 07:30:27