THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ VI

Quote:

The fundamental problem with contaiment of the Saddam State is that it allowed continuation of mass murder of Iraqi innocents and Saddam sponsorship of terrorist mass murder of worldwide innocents.

my emphasis.

This portion is false.

There's only one truth and this truth is .... yours, ican?

It was NOT OUR PROBLEM. It was, and still is, an international problem, but this administration decided on its own to buy it.

From personal experiences I know that he has easily access to even better history knowledge, 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, 12 months a year ...

Quote:

From personal experiences I know that he has easily access to even better history knowledge, 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, 12 months a year ...

And its free (sort of)

To take it one step further, how long do you think Russia and France would have remained non-committal if Saddam had attacked any of his neighbors with WMDs?

cicerone imposter wrote:

To take it one step further, how long do you think Russia and France would have remained non-committal if Saddam had attacked any of his neighbors with WMDs?

At least a year! If they themselves or their neighbors were so attacked, it wouldn't matter how long would it It would thereby be too damn late for them:!: Of course, if we were attacked first with WMDs, like we were with airliners, they would have probably remained "non-committal" for several years barring an attack on them; perhaps they would have even cheered:!:

At least a year! If they themselves or their neighbors were so attacked, it wouldn't matter how long would it It would thereby be too damn late for them. Of course, if the US were attacked first with WMDs, like the US was with hijacked airliners, they would have probably remained "non-committal" for several years barring an attack on them; perhaps they would have even cheered.

You're confused: the airliner attacks were instigated by OBL and citizens of Saudi Arabia, not Iraq.

cicerone imposter wrote:

You're confused: the airliner attacks were instigated by OBL and citizens of Saudi Arabia, not Iraq.

No! It is you who are confused.

First, the US state department has officially recognized 25 terrorist groups and they are not all from Saudi Arabia, but they all seek to murder innocent people.

Second, OBL was himself kicked out of Saudi Arabia long before 9/11/2001. He eventually deposited himself and his gang in Afghanistan with the Taliban.

Third, I do not think a continued preoccupation with OBL and which terrorist group did what is going to save anyone. They all must be exterminated.

Fourth and main point, the Russians and French did not care that their weapon building assistance to Saddam presented a potential threat to everyone; they did not care because they believed they would be the last to be attacked by terrorists with those weapons; they did not care because they believed the US, UK and other western European countries like Spain would be attacked with such weapons before they would.

People shouldn't drive and use the keyboard when they are on drugs

So stop doing that!

Of course, you have conveniently overlooked the fact that he was never welcom in Iraq, due mainly to his opposition to Hussein.

What are you now, a Dalek?

Main Entry: prob·a·bi·lism
Pronunciation: 'prä-b&-b&-"li-z&m
Function: noun
Etymology: French probabilisme, from Latin probabilis probable
1 : a theory that in disputed moral questions any solidly probable course may be followed even though an opposed course is or appears more probable
2 : a theory that certainty is impossible especially in the sciences and that probability suffices to govern belief and action
- prob·a·bi·list /-list/ adjective or noun

No, you aren't a Dalek, merely living in your own little strange universe.

merely living in your own little strange universe

ican711nm wrote:

So stop doing that!

Since more than 20 years now, ican! You can get similar help as I got help ...