as I pointed out in my last post, criminals have been armed with other weapons also,
A very small number....given the availability of handguns, how many people were killed by a stack of coins in a sock last year ?
The victims need competent defensive firepower.
This is an assumption based on personal bias.
Q.E.D.: your argument is disproven.
When I acknowledge my argument is disproven you will be the first to know. In the meantime, do not make rash statements.
That is arrogant, officious and presumptuous foolishness,
in furtherance of your fantasy.
Is this from the same person who told me they had won the argument ? Perhaps in your mind there are no end of wins.
Carrying a gun never made me feel "important"
You said you were sick and needed a gun to feel better. That is a rise in your feelings of importance.
Your logic is very, very flawed today.
Your argument is that if more violence is available to people they will use it less...and you have the audacity to talk about flawed logic.
How dare u presume to know what I am thinking ??
How dare you claim to have won an argument without my concession.