13
   

US 160 / UK 0 The score for murdered police officers last year.

 
 
MJA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 01:01 pm
@fresco,
Thanks!

=
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 01:44 pm
@fresco,
The murder rate for police officers and others in the UK will take an even more of a dive when the ban on the sales of large kitchen knives become law.

Those evil knives manufacturers.



fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 03:04 pm
@BillRM,
Smile
A bit difficult to go lower than zero for police !
NB. Handguns are specifically cited for US police figure as opposed to knives, sharpened screwdrivers or hatpins, but general point taken !
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 04:08 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:
Smile
A bit difficult to go lower than zero for police !
NB. Handguns are specifically cited for US police figure
as opposed to knives, sharpened screwdrivers or hatpins, but general point taken !
Let the record indicate that I have never told anyone to join the police.

I am unwilling to compromize my Constitutional Right to self-defense,
for the benefit of anyone else. IF the police honor their oath
to support the Constitution, then thay will join me
in fighting against gun control.

Indeed, even if I had joined the police,
I 'd still have opposed gun control as vigorously as possible.

I wanna live in a WELL ARMED SOCIETY,
committed to Individualism, laissez faire capitalism and hostile to collectivism.

That is what America is all about:
the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.

America was NOT created for the convenience
nor the benefit of the police.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 04:12 pm
@fresco,
Quote:
A bit difficult to go lower than zero for police !


True however you just expand the time frame until you have a few British cops kill in the line of duty by guns or others means.
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 04:40 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
A bit difficult to go lower than zero for police !


True however you just expand the time frame until you have a few British cops kill in the line of duty by guns or others means.


...and your point is what exactly?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 04:56 pm
@contrex,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
A bit difficult to go lower than zero for police !


True however you just expand the time frame until you have a few British cops kill in the line of duty by guns or others means.
contrex wrote:
...and your point is what exactly?
I suspect that he is referring
to the progressive diminution
and strangulation of personal freedom,
by the collective,
including the personal right to EXIST.

It is the innermost, sacrosanct faith of the left
that the answer to every problem
is to curtail, reduce and choke the personal freedom of the Individual citizen.





David
RABEL222
 
  0  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 04:57 pm
@contrex,
They dont have a point other than to baffle them with bull shyte.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 04:58 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
David,

As a matter of interest, how many guns have you got ?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 05:01 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

David,

As a matter of interest, how many guns have you got ?
I don 't have an inventory.
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 05:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Laughing
Your self defence argument surely requires one at the most, so what does more than one tell us about you ?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 05:15 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:
Laughing
Your self defence argument surely requires one at the most,
so what does more than one tell us about you ?
That statistic does not tell u anything,
but I will tell u that I collect guns and coins of old gold and silver.
I also collect kaleidoscopes.
Do u think that I have too many of any of them ????
Shoud I throw some in the garbage ?

Inquiring minds wanna know!





David
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 05:19 pm
David, nobody is disputing your right to have your opinion (or gun), or anyone to have an opinion (or gun), for that matter, but you keep beating the drum about it. Do you have to make your point every single time an issue arises? That's my question for you. Must you continually proselytize?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 05:29 pm
@Mame,
Mame wrote:
David, nobody is disputing your right to have your opinion (or gun), or anyone to have an opinion (or gun), for that matter, but you keep beating the drum about it. Do you have to make your point every single time an issue arises? That's my question for you. Must you continually proselytize?
Well, if a RELEVANT issue arises,
then it seems like a good idea, yeah.

If an irrelevant issue arises, then: no.

Relevance is the criterion.

Sometimes, people comment on me by NAME,
or on my expressed position.




David
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 05:45 pm
@fresco,
Because their position is supported by the Constitution.

Whatever you think about the effects of private gun ownership, it is protected by the 2nd Amendment.

You're not going to change minds on the topic with isolated statistics.

If you are committed to gun control, focus your efforts on having the Constitution appropriately amended.

As far as David weighing in on these threads ebeth, why would you consider him proselytizing and not frisco or calamity Jane?

If people really can't stand David's opinions on gun control, I would suggest they stop repeatedly posting their own, because everyone know he will show up on a gun related thread.

fresco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 12:52 am
@OmSigDAVID,
What it tells us, together with your incessant posts on the subject, is that you are fond of guns ! For all we know you are obsessed with guns. All this blather about the constitution could be a side show in support of an obsession.

Let us hope you stay in control of your collection and not vice versa!
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 01:50 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Is your conclusion that the appalling figures for US police murder by hand-guns is nothing to do with US gun laws ?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 02:51 am
@fresco,
fresco wrote:
What it tells us, together with your incessant posts on the subject,
is that you are fond of guns !
Yes; maybe u did not see my posts
wherein I told of my lusting
for the revolvers of police, when I was 3.
(I don't remember much before then.)



fresco wrote:
For all we know you are obsessed with guns.
Yes; I 've given them a lot of thawt.





fresco wrote:
All this blather about the constitution could be a side show in support of an obsession.
Yes; that 's OK, as long as the USSC agrees with me. (HELLER and McDONALD cases)
Its the same as being obsessed with reading newspapers or obsessed with voting in elections.



fresco wrote:
Let us hope you stay in control of your collection and not vice versa!
Vice-versa is IMPOSSIBLE,
because inanimate objects cannot control anything by themselves.





David
0 Replies
 
wayne
 
  3  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 03:17 am
@fresco,
I've been looking, and as best I can find, the total in the line of duty deaths for U.S. police officers 2010 is 162. Including 43 auto accidents, 13 heart attacks, and 59 by gunfire. Your thread title is shamelessly bull crappy.

While 59 shooting deaths is not good, it's a far cry from what you are trying to peddle here.

The Officer down memorial page contains all the specifics including the names of officers fallen in the line of duty.
wayne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 03:46 am
@wayne,
143 police officers commited suicide in 2009, can't find how many used a gun.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.8 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 12:39:01