@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
chai2 wrote:You started this thread wanting all to be sikened and saddened by circumstances you don't even know to be true.
You act a retorical question, again about something you don't even know is happening.
oh puhleeeeeze
The OP asks about our feelings about hypothetical situations and you're trying to claim that some specific situation (which wasn't even posited) isn't true. I'm not sure why you're so hepped up on proving that the hypothetical situations proposed in the OP don't exist, but it does seem like something very personal has been triggered.
No, nothing personal at all.
It's just hard to theorize about hypothetical situations, when all you know is that someone has some kind of impression that something is going on.
I'm not saying at all this hypothetical situation doesn't existed. Never said that at all.
However, from her OP, talking about how she's sikened and saddened by freeloaders, then later finding out she's talking about situations she's overheard in line at Walmart, or around the water cooler, I just don't find a lot of credibility.
I'm not sure what the OP wants. Does she want us all to be equally sickened and saddened?
Does she want us to tell her how the hell people can act like this?
Yes, ok....no one likes it that there are those that sit at home, while the house is mess, not cleaning it, not making any attempts to look for work, when there is work out there they could be applying for.
I guess we can all agree no one likes it that someone would sit at home and pick their toes, when they can be doing something productive, like looking for work, or taking care of the home.
That would pretty much leave the OP dead in the water. Everyone is sikened by this, and no one understands how the hell anyone can be this way.
We can believe that the woman behind them at Walmart who is whining about her husband to whoever will listen is carrying this huge load, on the fact her lips are moving and these words are coming out.
We can believe the woman at work who tells us her son in law is a bum, just because she says so.
Or, we can have a healthy skepticism about it. Maybe we could investigate (if it was worth it to us) to see if this is the truth.
I hear people say why wouldn't we assume someone isn't telling the truth. I think there's a strong case saying why wouldn't we assume someone isn't telling the truth, especially when embellishment garners you sympathy.
I'm not willing to assume the people the OP is talking about are in fact freeloaders. No more than that.
You can counter is has been said this doesn't include all people, but the OP is obviously talking about a particular number of people, and I just don't buy that is the truth about all the people she's talking about.