JLNobody wrote:Vivien, delightful images. One thinks of "action paintings" (which is what these appear to be) as large works requiring sweeping gestures from the shoulder. Because of their small size, I assume yours are generated from the wrist. Did you ENJOY making them? Are they "designed" consciously or are they impulsively expressive
they sort of evolve! the last one was very loosely based on the format of a digital image I did ages ago.
The red ones were a deliberate challenge to myself to do some 'red' landscapes and make them work - it was great fun working with the expressionist intensity of colours.
I was also enjoying using metallic and pearlescent paints - there is a hint of pearlescence in some of the colours (tube of pearlescent medium mixed in, but not
too much) and in the blue painting the coppery coloured part
is copper metallic paint.
The formats and composition are loosely based on the hills and fields I pass on the way home from teaching - throughout the winter I pass them at dusk quite a lot and I love the light effects and strangeness that occur - so they are sort of distilled from memory and then played with.
sorry they are at an angle but they were wet and shiny and I got a horrible glare photographing them straight on.
There is a greater range of subtle colours than shows here
I want to do some large large canvasses - that's the next stage after I do some 20 inch ones in the series for an upcoming show.
I sometimes really enjoy working small but a large canvas allows for much more interesting subtle changes etc - subtle seems a strange word to associate with vivid paintings but they still must have some subtler passages that need looking at closely or they are unsatisfying long term.
I suppose they were 'from the wrist' - not sure! Larger work certainly is from the shoulder as you say.