12
   

When will PM's be enabled again?

Forums: a2k, Forum Help, Robert Gentel, Private Messages, P Ms
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Night Ripper
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 07:58 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:
Meantime, newbies now take pms as some kind of amendment right.


Stop acting hysterical. Nowhere have I made any kind of demands or showed any sense of entitlement. I've simply asked when they would be re-enabled. If Robert says never then "oh well". I was simply making an inquiry and since you're some kind of sycophant, you jumped all over it.
ossobuco
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:03 pm
@Night Ripper,
I do guess that Robert will work out a good system.
Nattering isn't useful.

Why not re enable pms to everyone, you're kidding....
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:05 pm
@Night Ripper,
Easy there, tiger. You're fast making yourself very unpopular. Back off and act civil to other members, especially because your WAY out of line here.

Having been involved briefly on any site doesn't qualify you for immediate enstatement to all the site's functionality especially PMs. Can you understand the security risk if you actually WERE a spammer or hacker bad citizen, etc? Frankly it's functionality that you haven't earned, but that's beside the point.

Not saying you are hacker but why would anyone want to belong on a site where just ANYONE could get instant messaging access. It would a webmasters nightmare with spam elimination and more hack attacks consuming most of their maint time. Think about what kind of effect the access you're asking for would add to a webmaster and staff work load. There's not a team of people and a full time staff running things. I'm sure you have no frikkin idea the degree of work it takes for upkeep with this being a free site.

At some point you might get your head out your ass.
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:06 pm
@Ragman,
Wait, he is in line for martyr.
0 Replies
 
Night Ripper
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:09 pm
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:

Easy there, tiger. You're fast making yourself very unpopular. Back off and act civil, especially because your WAY out of line here.


I'm only giving the same rude treatment that was offered to me first.

I'm so unpopular that someone keeps thumbing my posts up...
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:11 pm
@Night Ripper,
I'm not a sychophant, Robert and I blast each other once in a while, air clearing.

I jump over it because you are stupid while accusing.
Night Ripper
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:12 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:
I jump over it because you are stupid while accusing.


Aww, stop insulting me or you'll make me cry.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:13 pm
@Night Ripper,
NR, I've been using PMs for quite some time now. Do you know how?
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:13 pm
@Night Ripper,
Quote:
I'm so unpopular that someone keeps thumbing my posts up...


I don't do that silly numbers thing [it's only for the incestuals] but that was good, really good, NR.

0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:18 pm
@cicerone imposter,
That's because your membership-join date doesn't fall within the parameters that were used to block the use of PMs. Only members with a join date after that specific (unknown) date are not able to use the PM system.
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:23 pm
Crikey.

There is no chance I'll have a vigorous website, but if I did, I'd like some control.

I remain interested in argument re my points of view. Full blouse shut down attacks make no sense.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:25 pm
@Butrflynet,
Didn't know that; thanks for letting me know.
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:27 pm
@ossobuco,
Quote:
There is no chance I'll have a vigorous website, but if I did, I'd like some control.


Like putting lots of gates in the fence so you didn't have to keep climbing up and falling off to one side then climbing up and falling off to the other. That's too hard on the ole noggin', eh, Osso?
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:28 pm
@cicerone imposter,
and also members that send nasty PMs to other members.

just saying...
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:28 pm
@Night Ripper,
eh?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:38 pm
@Night Ripper,
Night Ripper wrote:

Those members "spammed" only because they were merged from another forum. I'm sure those people are gone now or at least don't care anymore. Why not re-enable PM's for everyone?

The philosophy forum was reorganized. The ones that hung in there are posting much like they did before Robert bought the site.
Night Ripper
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:42 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

Night Ripper wrote:

Those members "spammed" only because they were merged from another forum. I'm sure those people are gone now or at least don't care anymore. Why not re-enable PM's for everyone?

The philosophy forum was reorganized. The ones that hung in there are posting much like they did before Robert bought the site.


So, are you saying that those people that were spamming before have even less of a reason to spam now (aside from the months of time that have passed)?
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 08:44 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:

I'll disengage, this is all silly.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 09:00 pm
@Night Ripper,
Night Ripper wrote:

edgarblythe wrote:

Night Ripper wrote:

Those members "spammed" only because they were merged from another forum. I'm sure those people are gone now or at least don't care anymore. Why not re-enable PM's for everyone?

The philosophy forum was reorganized. The ones that hung in there are posting much like they did before Robert bought the site.


So, are you saying that those people that were spamming before have even less of a reason to spam now (aside from the months of time that have passed)?

I would say they have zero cause to spam. But, as has been pointed out, Robert is busy elsewhere, as dictated by his finances and has stated he will take care of PMs in his free time, which he cannot predict.
Night Ripper
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Jan, 2011 09:09 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

Night Ripper wrote:

edgarblythe wrote:

Night Ripper wrote:

Those members "spammed" only because they were merged from another forum. I'm sure those people are gone now or at least don't care anymore. Why not re-enable PM's for everyone?

The philosophy forum was reorganized. The ones that hung in there are posting much like they did before Robert bought the site.


So, are you saying that those people that were spamming before have even less of a reason to spam now (aside from the months of time that have passed)?

I would say they have zero cause to spam. But, as has been pointed out, Robert is busy elsewhere, as dictated by his finances and has stated he will take care of PMs in his free time, which he cannot predict.


If there is no cause for spam then why does he need to code an anti-spam feature and thereby force us to wait longer? Why not just re-enable PM's in the same way he disabled them?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
For the sake of variety: ABRUPT CHANGE COMING TO A2K - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
  1. Forums
  2. » When will PM's be enabled again?
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 12:19:05
▲ ▼