@JTT,
JTT wrote:
At first blush, this seems like a fairer idea.
Some people believe that whomever gets the most votes should win.
The counter argument is that candidates would ignore rural issues in favor of where they could collect the most votes.
The electoral college system tried to deal with that by, essentially, forcing candidates to compete in smaller states.
Awarding electoral votes based on who wins a congressional district vs carrying a state, may at first seem like a good idea, JTT. But it will never get implemented.
The boundaries of districts get juggled around every 10 years after the census, with new lines drawn not just on population but also on ethnicity, etc.
There is a lot of politics, with the party in power usually getting the upper hand. The great word is gerrymandering.
I am quite certain that allocating electoral votes will not change.