@cicerone imposter,
Quote:I'm not defining anything. Planned Parenthood provides
(see ci's copy of PP's PR handout)
And it's a dynamic entity. It seems to be expanding. If trust-busting doesn't apply to such laudable objectives and the expansion continues then it will have to be nationalised. Think of the jobs.
There's no limit to the demand for high-quality, affordable sexual and reproductive health care.
So the argument at the political level is whether the expansion should continue, with various items inserted into News broadcasts, and what-not, to assist in that expansion, or whether it should be let down a bit, continuing the balloon metaphor, in case the expansion reaches a point where it pops of its own accord without the need for a pin.
And that's assuming that the objectives of the PP, which is staffed by people very much like ourselves, (see Leveson Enquiry), are to be met; which the Church doesn't think they will be. The PP outfit does need people to need high-quality, affordable sexual and reproductive health care. The Church thinks, as Ivan Illich did, that the financial expansion can be increased by making people sick.
And what about other aspects of society competing with the PP for resources?
Politicians can't afford to be only thinking about one of those in isolation as you are doing. Resources the PP use have been withdrawn from everything else.