68
   

The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 11:37 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:



Republicans really don't like Mitt Romney.




Americans really don't like Barack Obama.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 11:40 am
@H2O MAN,
Thay r both pretty bad. Mitt is a R.I.N.O.
If he were nominated, maybe he 'd choose obama to run under him for vice president.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 01:39 pm



It's clear that Obama does not have the claimed
BILLION dollar campaign fund... not even close.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 02:51 pm
I missed this last week. Mitt Romney reiterated his belief that the Federal Minimum Wage should be linked to inflation. When he ran for governor (2002) and for President (2008) he made the same argument. That position is not going to sit well with many of the rank and file conservatives.
Meanwhile, his people are downplaying the importance of today's contests in Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota. He will probably do well in Colorado but could lose the other two. As noted, no delegates will be awarded in the non-binding caucuses and primary.
roger
 
  3  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:06 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

In southern Illinois, where they get idiots from Chicago and St. Louis, they paint "COW" on the sides of their livestock with white wash in letters about two feet high. Which doesn't mean that cows don't get shot, but it lowers the casualty rate.


I may have mentioned this before, but it is still a good idea to lock up those DEERE tractors. Some of those guys can read.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:07 pm


What will Obama do when gas prices reach
$5.00 and more per gallon later this spring?









He'll blame GW Bush.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:08 pm
@realjohnboy,
I might could live with the concept, but practically, it sounds like restating your financial position every year because property values constantly change.

I did support the last increase to minimum wage, by the way, but I do have occasional doubts on the subject.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:10 pm
@H2O MAN,
Obama will have no problem with $5/gallon gasoline. It's still the cheapest petro in the world; most places have been paying $9+ per gallon.

You have no real perspective on anything that has to do with economics.

Keep making yourself look the fool you are; it's fun and entertainment for most of us.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,


Ci, you are an uptight ignoranus.
0 Replies
 
failures art
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:29 pm
I said a while ago that Bachmann wouldn't be able to deal with the loss of attention and the spotlight. I comforted others who said they'd miss her crazy quotes. I said she'd gift them with some great ones during the race to get herself in some papers.

Oh Bachmann,
I'm never gonna' give you up.

Quote:
Michele Bachmann may be out of the GOP presidential race, but the Minnesota congresswoman still believes she was "the perfect candidate."

Bachmann told Bloomberg TV in an interview taped last week that she won't be endorsing any of her Republican rivals anytime soon. But when asked by by Bloomberg's Al Hunt who was the most conservative of the GOP candidates, the Tea Party favorite plugged ... herself.

"I was. I was the perfect candidate," she said. "America had their chance with the perfect candidate. Any of our candidates are going to be acceptable to the American people. More than acceptable because right now, if you look at the Gallup map that came out this week, President Obama is in big trouble all across the country."

Bachmann, who announced last week that she'll seek a fourth term in Congress, said she hopes to be a "unifying" person in the GOP presidential race and help tie together disparate factions in the Republican Party.

She abandoned her presidential bid the day after finishing sixth in the Iowa caucuses last month.


source

A
R
T
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 03:47 pm
@failures art,
Bachmann doesn't even know what reality is, because the latest polls of Obama vs Willard is reported here.

Quote:
In the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, President Obama leads GOP frontrunner Mitt Romney in a head-to-head match-up, 51-45 percent, with serious weaknesses for both candidates lurking in the poll details.
Romney’s business experience is seen as a net positive, and he leads the president when it comes to whom voters trust to handle the economy and create jobs. Only 44 percent approve of the president’s handling of the economy.
But they trust the president on the issue of taxes, and 66 percent believe Romney personally didn’t pay his fair share in taxes.


And from Gallup:
Quote:
Barack Obama's Job Approval Average by Subgroup
Most recent weekly average: 46%.

realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 04:12 pm
@roger,
On the minimum wage issue, Roger, the last increase was done in 3 stages with the last one setting the rate at $7.25 in July, 2009. There are many indexes to choose from. I chose CPI-W which is the one used to determine increases for SSAE benefit increases.
As of the end of 2011, the minimum wage adjusted for inflation would be $7.65/hr.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 04:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
More scrutiny on Willard's tax return (from the NYT).

Quote:
Romney’s Returns Revive Scrutiny of Offshore Tax Shelters
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
Published: February 7, 2012

WASHINGTON — Mitt Romney’s tax returns have drawn political scrutiny on multiple fronts, like his relatively low tax rates and the money parked in a Swiss bank account. But on Capitol Hill, his returns have caught the eyes of members of both parties for what appears to be his use of a type of complex shelter that has been debated for years in battles over evasion and fairness in the tax code.
Multimedia

For Romneys, Friendly Code Reduces Taxes (January 25, 2012)

The technique in question allows nonprofit institutions and large retirement funds to exploit the advantages of shell companies set up in tax havens like the Cayman Islands by investing money with private equity firms like Bain Capital, which Mr. Romney ran. Ordinarily, such private-equity investments are frequently subject to something called the unrelated business income tax. But by going offshore, pension funds, universities, foundations and even large Individual Retirement Accounts can structure those investments to avoid that heavy tax.
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 04:44 pm


Obama's Gaffes, Lies, Hypocrisy, Broken Promises & Exaggerations!
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 04:55 pm
Final polls (PPP) for today's contests:
Colorado: Romney (37%); Santorum (27%); Gingrich (21%); Paul (13%)
Minnesota: Santorum (33%); Romney (24%); Gingrich (22%); Paul (20%)
Missouri: Santorum (45%); Romney (32%); Paul (19%); Gingrich (0%*)
*Gingrich failed to qualify to be on the ballot.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 05:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
The technique in question allows nonprofit institutions and large retirement funds to exploit the advantages of shell companies set up in tax havens like the Cayman Islands by investing money with private equity firms like Bain Capital, which Mr. Romney ran. Ordinarily, such private-equity investments are frequently subject to something called the unrelated business income tax. But by going offshore, pension funds, universities, foundations and even large Individual Retirement Accounts can structure those investments to avoid that heavy tax.


I presume that means that those engaged either directly, or in a dependency arrangement, in nonprofit institutions, large retirement funds, large being relative, pension funds, universities, foundations and even large Individual Retirement Accounts, are likely to be Romneyites.

It would not make any sense if they were not as it would suggest that they haven't worked out yet which side their bread is buttered on and should thus be disqualified from voting as being mentally below the age of 18.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 05:53 pm
@spendius,
Your presumptions are only of interest only to you, because it's not about bread or butter.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 06:08 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Do you get a kick out of calling him "Willard?"

Why not try "Poopy-Head," it might give you a bigger thrill.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 06:10 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Actually I'm interested in whatever spendi presumes and writes, regardless of whether or not it makes any sense. I strongly suspect that I am not alone.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2012 06:14 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Do you get a kick out of calling him "Willard?"

Why not try "Poopy-Head," it might give you a bigger thrill.


Well, it IS his name. His first name, even.

Cycloptichorn
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 08:30:04