68
   

The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

 
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:23 am
@Setanta,
Deep into history would be the story of Richard M. Nixon.

Joe(We could kick that around some more.)Nation
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:27 am
Romney is new at being a conservative and it shows when he speaks.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:29 am
@H2O MAN,
So what are you gonna do spurt? are you gonna sit out the election cause nobody's conservative enough for you?

0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  4  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:33 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

Romney is new at being a conservative and it shows when he speaks.


Meanwhile the asshole with 2 sick ex-wives and the morals of a gutter-rat is the man for you eh? Now that's REAL American.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:34 am
@Joe Nation,
Nope, i'm sorry . . . you don't have Dick Nixon to kick around any more . . .

Then there's Adlai Stevenson, and Paul Simon . . . and hey, don't forget William Jennings Bryan . . . he got crucified . . .
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:34 am
@Questioner,


Newt is much more of a 'real American' than Obama
could ever hope to be and don't you forget it!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:35 am
Now it looks like Trump will endorse Romney, not Gingrich.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/02/10300919-nbc-news-sources-say-trump-to-endorse-romney
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:37 am
@sozobe,
Trump is going to milk this for all it's worth...
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:52 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
The innermost essence of liberalism is INCONSISTENCY with some designated criterion.


Why don't you walk on your hands and wear your underpants outside your trousers? You could drive on the left.

After reading your ridiculous thesis Dave it is no wonder we need conservatives to get anything done.

It's like saying a quarter-back is a quarter of a back.
DrewDad
 
  6  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 11:59 am
@sozobe,
I'd have figured Trump was too jealous of Romney's hair for that to ever happen.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:00 pm
@DrewDad,
Now, that's funny! Laughing
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:14 pm
@spendius,
I would have thought that an ex-govenor would be preferred to ex others in the main. An ex govenor has long experience of carrying out tasks a president has to do. The selecting of office holders and advisers, relating to senates and congresses and communicating with the public, for example.

He has been where the buck stops on a smaller stage. An ex-speaker or senator or congressman or independent has no experience of that sort of heat. And a 4 year president has just that only more so. And a politicised First Lady in a two term White House has too.

Media are keeping Gingrich alive because with a runaway Romney spending on ads would tank.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:16 pm
@spendius,
Your hair joke is great!

spendius wrote:



Media are keeping Gingrich alive because with a runaway Romney spending on ads would tank.


Thus exposing the greed that drives Obama's liberal media.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:19 pm
Andrew Sullivan, wrapping up a post re: news about the war in Afghanistan drawing to a close:

Quote:
In running for re-election, Obama will be able to say he delivered on four core objectives: restoring economic growth in one year after inheriting the worst recession since the 1930s; ending the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; delivering universal healthcare; and saving the now buoyant American auto sector. And Romney wants to run against Obama's record. Go for it, Mitt.


http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/02/change-you-can-believe-in-two-wars-ended.html
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  6  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:19 pm
@sozobe,
First, he couldn't decide whether he was running. Now, he can't decide who he is endorsing. I've decided I'm not caring.
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:22 pm
@roger,
Ha! Yeah.

I have the impression from various news accounts that he broadly hinted to BOTH campaigns that he was going to endorse that candidate. Which wouldn't seem impossibly putzy for this guy.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:29 pm
@roger,
Let's face it, the Don is in it for the "show."
roger
 
  2  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Definately not for the win or place.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 12:58 pm
@sozobe,
Newt was the only one who agreed to come to his "debate". T'would be quite a slap for him to endorse Romney.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2012 01:19 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Let's face it, the Don is in it for the "show."
I don 't believe that u have ever
been right about anything b4,
C.I., but this time: u got it right.





David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/28/2025 at 02:43:54