68
   

The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 01:36 pm
@realjohnboy,
It's not coming in #1 that counts in the Iowa caucuses. People that support minor candidates will have to drop that support when their candidate is not viable and choose another candidate to support.

At 22% Paul isn't viable.
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 01:41 pm
@realjohnboy,
Does anybody really take polls seriously? They are known to be way off the mark and change daily by huge amounts. Polls a few years ago, made clear that Obama didn't stand a chance, yet, he got elected.

Actually, when thinking about it, yes, the liberals take the polls incredibly seriously. As soon as Herman Cain pulled well out in front in the polls, 30000 mystery mistresses suddenly appeared. How odd, that all these women, with whom he may or may not have had contact of a sexual form, suddenly sprang up as his numbers climbed. They'd had months to step up and say something; but, no, they waited. So, yes, somebody took the polls seriously.
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 01:43 pm
@parados,
No, Paul is not viable. I think that 3rd place will be an embarrassment for Romney. He will do well in NH but that will be followed by SC and FL. If, I say if, Newt can withstand withering examination of his history, Romney could be in trouble heading into Super Tuesday.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 01:50 pm
@Sturgis,
Sturgis wrote:

Does anybody really take polls seriously? They are known to be way off the mark and change daily by huge amounts. Polls a few years ago, made clear that Obama didn't stand a chance, yet, he got elected.

Actually, when thinking about it, yes, the liberals take the polls incredibly seriously. As soon as Herman Cain pulled well out in front in the polls, 30000 mystery mistresses suddenly appeared. How odd, that all these women, with whom he may or may not have had contact of a sexual form, suddenly sprang up as his numbers climbed. They'd had months to step up and say something; but, no, they waited. So, yes, somebody took the polls seriously.



So, I take that to mean you think "the liberals" had something to do with producing all those accusations, huh? Well that's really brilliant. Not.

"The liberals" would LOVE a Cain or Bachmann to be the GOP candidate. Don't you see that?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 02:26 pm
"The liberals" would LOVE a Cain or Bachmann to be the GOP candidate. Don't you see that?

Slavering for it, in fact.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 02:50 pm
@Sturgis,
Cain essentially destroyed himself, and the "smart" democrats wanted Cain to be a contender for 2012.

Do you seriously believe Cain's 999 plan was a good one?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 02:59 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I think Cain's wife is starting to think that he may have a split personality and the 999 was 666.

I may be wrong but I think that he could be psychopath and among his own in-group, "that may have been his joke about how he was going to make the little man pay even more taxes.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 03:03 pm
@reasoning logic,
"666" with a slur could sound like "sick, sick, sick." Rolling Eyes Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 06:38 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
It's not coming in #1 that counts in the Iowa caucuses. People that support minor candidates will have to drop that support when their candidate is not viable and choose another candidate to support.

At 22% Paul isn't viable.
I supported his love of personal freedom, at the expense of jurisdiction.
He became non-viable by declaring that a nuclear armed Iran is OK with him.





David
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 06:53 pm
Breaking news with Glenn Beck.

OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 07:03 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
Breaking news with Glenn Beck.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMzxy59UXzs[/youtube]
It looks like the alleged 99% were vastly outnumbered by those who scoffed at them.

I noticed that thay were screaming from prepared scripts.
I wonder who the puppetmaster was ????????

Long live GREED!!!!!





David
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 07:25 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Long live GREED!!!!!


Be happy Greed is not going anywhere in a hurry. We still have a very long time to come before we see the end of greed.

realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 07:37 pm
For what it is worth, the Des Moines Register in its new poll has Gingrich at 25%, Paul @ 18% and Romney @ 16%. Undicided is @ 11%.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 07:52 pm
@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:
For what it is worth, the Des Moines Register in its new poll has Gingrich at 25%, Paul @ 18%
and Romney @ 16%. Undicided is @ 11%.
I 'm really happy to see that fake, Romney decline!!!





David
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 08:18 pm
The see-saw in the republican contenders is what makes for the interesting run for the big office this time around, and we still have 11-months to go.

Newt's past, like Cain's past, will not be silenced.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 3 Dec, 2011 08:22 pm
@reasoning logic,

DAVID wrote:
Long live GREED!!!!!
reasoning logic wrote:


Be happy Greed is not going anywhere in a hurry.
We still have a very long time to come before we see the end of greed.
Thanx for your good thawt.
I will endeavor to promote GREED wherever I go.

The question about "permission" to act like a monkey
because we came from them fails to indicate from WHOM
that "permission" was granted. We need no permission,
but if we violate the rights of others,
then we might expect retaliatory consequences.

Whether we came from monkeys is not related to our rights.





David
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2011 08:44 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
Quote:
Long live GREED!!!!!

Be happy Greed is not going anywhere in a hurry. We still have a very long time to come before we see the end of greed.


OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2011 09:29 am
@Ticomaya,
Very well put, by Milton Freidman.
Thanx for the video, Tico.
I re-played it 2ice.





David
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2011 09:36 am
@Ticomaya,
I have seen his work and I disagree with his philosophy. The way I see it is the more that we are able to work together the more that we can have as a society with less labor involved.
The more that we serve our own personal greed the less we have as a society and the harder we have to work for it. If you are a psychopath that does not feel empathy this would not apply to you.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2011 09:53 am
http://content.cartoonbox.slate.com/?feature=73acb366845806dd51b9f674b37aef67
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 05:09:26