18
   

IF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WERE HELD TODAY WOULD OBAMA SWEEP IT ?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 06:24 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Id let it go Bill, Dave outed himself and hes actually proud of himself.
This is true; thank u, Farmer.


farmerman wrote:
I dont think that the vast majority of the German people,
when confronte with some "revisionism" re: Hitler, would agree with him.

If he doesnt see Hitker as a monster,
U r twisting what I said, Farmer.
Much of what he did was monstrous,
but his treatment of the communists shows that even monsters
can be very nice & admirable SOMETIMES
.



farmerman wrote:
then there aint nothin we can do to convince him.
Hitler was anti-Individualist and he SAID so; I deplore that & his authoritarianism.
I thawt I made that clear.





farmerman wrote:
Just remember these posts of his when you ask him to debate things like
his philosophy of "doing random act of kindness".
That is perfectly consistent; ideally, don't do that to commies.
Find BETTER targets for kindness, like greedy Individualists.

Doing random acts of kindness can be FUN
(like begifting unsuspecting waitresses with $100.oo bills,
for "winning the most beautiful girl around here contest").

Try it n see.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 06:28 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
It is a good or bad thing to DO,
depending upon whether thay were commies or not.
I said that is a good thing to do to commies.
I stand by that.
BillRM wrote:
So if someone happen to believe in the benefits of a social system
you do not approve of you should have the right to murder them?
The commies and the nazis tried to conquer and enslave the world, with ME in it.

I believe in self-defense and vengeance.





David
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 06:54 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
The commies and the nazis tried to conquer and enslave the world, with ME in it.


BULLSHIT..................the US have had troops on Russian soil as late as the early 1920s and no Russian troops had been on US soil.

So if anything it is the reverse with who had been trying to imposed who will on the other by arm force.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 02:47 pm
@BillRM,
David wrote:
The commies and the nazis tried to conquer and enslave the world, with ME in it.
BillRM wrote:

BULLSHIT..................the US have had troops on Russian soil as late as the early 1920s and no Russian troops had been on US soil.

So if anything it is the reverse with who had been trying to imposed who will on the other by arm force.
I 'm a little surprized that u say that, Bill.
I thawt u were better informed.
U seem knowledgeable about other things.

Anyway:
communism was always a system of world government, since marx wrote it.

The Reds never denied that.

The red in the commie flag that thay flew atop the Kremlin
represented the blood that was yet to be shed in a communist
conquest of the world.
It was hell on Earth.

Its ez and comfortable to discuss that NOW,
after we won the 3rd World War,
but back then, it was scary.





David
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 04:01 pm
So, anyway, back to the question. Yes, I think that Obama would be reelected if the election were held today. He's managed to alienate the few on both wings of the political spectrum, but not enough to not be reelected. He can't take his middle-range support for granted like he did during the midterms though. It will take a repeat of the effort and organization at the grassroots level to again get the vote out for him.

He also needs to get his OFA organization back out from under the umbrella of the Democratic party and can Tim Kaine. When he merged it with the party machinery, it lost a lot of oomph.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 09:00 pm
@BillRM,
David wrote:
True enuf that I approve of how Hitler dealt with the commies; (that was GOOD),
BillRM wrote:
Starting a war that ended up killing 40 millions plus USSR citizens you approved of?
Bill and Farmer, both:
Lemme get this straight:
do u both imply that it was BAD
that the nazis launched Operation Barbarosa ??

Does either of u, or both of u, prefer
that the nazis had NOT invaded the communist empire?





David
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 09:21 pm
I would think it would depend on who he runs against. Against Palin, he'd win hands down.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2010 10:01 pm
I think he absolutely would sweep it. The Republicans have NO top-tier candidates and Obama is great at campaigning.

When Mitch Daniels and John Thune are your top-candidates, your party is in trouble in the next election. The Republican candidate is also going to have to walk a really fine line between the 'Tea Party' position, and everyone else. I have no clue how they are going to do it.

Perhaps the greatest reason to believe that Obama would win, is that recent polling has shown that he is STILL trusted more than the Republicans on every issue.

Good luck pubbies, you're gonna need it. Because your current group of politicos suck, big time. And the worst part? is that you already knew that.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 07:17 am
@farmerman,
He absolutely would not sweep it.
Our man-child in chief, so-called president is a one term mistake.

Best of luck to all of the incumbent liberals and those liberals seeking office out there - you are going to need it.

Merry Christmas!!
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 07:19 am
@H2O MAN,
The respondent to whom your dumass post was addressed is not in the office. He is out enjoying cleaning up wrapping paper and is trying to find bows that the dogs have hidden.Therefore, This is an automatic Seasonal Greeting issued from my handheld LG device.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 08:12 am
@H2O MAN,
MERRY CHRISTMAS, Waterman,
but I will not join in wishing luck
to those liberals seeking office out there.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 09:10 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Bill and Farmer, both:
Lemme get this straight:
do u both imply that it was BAD
that the nazis launched Operation Barbarosa ??


I would had prefer the talks between England and France and the USSR before the start of WW2 and the agreements between Germany and the USSR had been reached instead had born fruit and all three would had ended up together destroying Nazis Germany at the very start.

OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 09:28 am
@BillRM,
David wrote:
Bill and Farmer, both:
Lemme get this straight:
do u both imply that it was BAD
that the nazis launched Operation Barbarosa ??
BillRM wrote:
I would had prefer the talks between England and France and the USSR before the start of WW2 and the agreements between Germany and the USSR had been reached instead had born fruit and all three would had ended up together destroying Nazis Germany at the very start.
That 's not the question:
given the extant state of affairs and affairs of state on June 21, 1941
do YOU consider the invasion of the communist empire
to have been a BAD thing ???





David
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 09:33 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
That 's not the question:
given the extant state of affairs and affairs of state on June 21, 1941
do YOU consider the invasion of the communist empire
to have been a BAD thing ???


For the West no for the 40 millions that was kill yes.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 09:35 am
@BillRM,

Quote:
That 's not the question:
given the extant state of affairs and affairs of state on June 21, 1941
do YOU consider the invasion of the communist empire
to have been a BAD thing ???


BillRM wrote:
For the West no for the 40 millions that was kill yes.
The ones who were killed were the LUCKY ones.
The others remained in hell as communist slaves.





David
Miller
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 09:38 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



Hell No!

PrezBO is a one term mistake, he will be swept out of office in 2012.

As long as half-wits can vote, Obama will be back in 2012.


OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 09:39 am
@Miller,
unless the 1/2 wits get mad at him
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 10:31 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
The ones who were killed were the LUCKY ones.
The others remained in hell as communist slaves.


Give me a break you are brighter then that to speak 1950s cold war bullshit that was dumb even in 1950s.

PS the "slaves" are now free at least the ones that was not murder by the Germen.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 10:37 am
@BillRM,
This is comical; two dummies arguing opposites ends of the issue.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Dec, 2010 11:38 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Doing random acts of kindness can be FUN
(like begifting unsuspecting waitresses with $100.oo bills,
for "winning the most beautiful girl around here contest").


Having seen him in person, I think I can safely say that that's not a random act of kindness. It's a random act by a creepy weirdo to gain favor with women who would otherwise avoid him like a stinking bag of dog ****.

NOTE: If you're worried that OmSigShit-for-brains here will be hurt by this message, don't worry. The creepy weirdo in question has me on ignore, so he won't ever see it.

That is, unless somebody quotes me. *hint, hint*


 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 12:22:56