18
   

IF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WERE HELD TODAY WOULD OBAMA SWEEP IT ?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2010 08:50 pm

or like giving him
a nice Beef Wellington when he is hungry and commanding him to EAT it.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  2  
Reply Wed 22 Dec, 2010 11:01 pm
@farmerman,
Since Rand isn't board certified, I bet other skeletons are looming in his closet.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 12:10 am
@Sturgis,
Sturgis wrote:

If ever there was any doubt, it has been now erased. You're an idiot.

Aside from the lack of communication, the facts are that he dilly dallyed with DADT, he shoved a crap filled health care bill at us wth that attention whore Pelosi p[we will learn what it says as it comes up he tolls us], and is screwing the senior citizens over untiil they're all penniless and dead! He's frozen Social Security benefits, it will be 3 years minimum with no increase even as actual costs rise. He didn't do a damn thing! If the first responders bill makes t through it's thanks not to him.


If he'd been a leader, a genuine and real and caring human being and not an insipid worm, he'd have made effrts I mean real efforts to have met with and brought together both sides to make sure the first responders would have had their medical expenses tended.

If he'd cared about DADT it have taken wouldn't nearly two years. He's done absolutely nothing. He made no
moves at it.



Want more? Remember his less than stellar response at the disaster n the Gulf?

Unemployment is still way up there. Then again, it better looks as people fnish theiir benefits and are off the rolls, makes it appear that it's getting better. Tell that to the 2 income family that is 1 paycheck now and the ever increasng liines at food pantrys and soup kitchens. And the pantrs and ktchens are hard pressed with the demand increasing and the donations decreasing. But hey, farmerman and other hoodwinked peoples thinks the President is doing a fuckng fine and dandy job to hell witht the starving.



Yeah he's not too shabby performancing, shabby w ould be an improvement.

He's an abject failure but at least he has a pretty wife.

Sweep an election? If the electorate continues to wear blinders and hear jeers from the left that "it's all George Bush's fault" the he'll win. Sweep? Even Carter could keep that from happening .


Wow, you really have that head of yours shoved deep up there. I don't think you'll be able to get that out. Let's see...how can we extract your head from your asshole...hmmm..I guess since you're a right-winger we should use an appropriate method...okay, how about we give your asshole a tax cut, and then drop some bombs on it. Problem solved.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 01:43 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
My premise was my premise. IF the election were held today. TWO MONTHS AGO, he was dead meat.
Today, its amazing how the meat can spring to life.
So u r saying that (mysteriously) the unemployment situation
woud be forgotten and DADT is all any voter woud care about,
because people only care about homosexuals;
thay don 't care about money !!??


BillRM
 
  3  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:13 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I assume that the people are not dumb enough to forget who ruin the economic and almost drove the world into a 1930 depression in the first place.
farmerman
 
  6  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:28 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
So u r saying that (mysteriously) the unemployment situation
woud be forgotten and DADT is all any voter woud care about,
because people only care about homosexuals;
thay don 't care about money !!??

The recession seems finally to be breaking up and some clear recovery signs are here. As far as "only caring for homosexuals". I suppose that 40 years ago, you would be accusing me of "only caring for niggers" eh?. Civil rights should be a concern to you I thought. (Of course most lawyers display their principals as "malleable for a fee " ).

I see the CONSERVATIVE radio shills are NOW portraying Obama as A "Sellout" to his base. What hypocrisy these guys peddle. .
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 05:29 am
@BillRM,
David has a very good memory, conveniently, Its just not too long.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:18 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
I assume that the people are not dumb enough to forget who ruin the economic and almost drove the world
into a 1930 depression in the first place.
Yes. I remember that began at the end of Clinton-- a good-bye present.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:25 am
@farmerman,
David wrote:
So u r saying that (mysteriously) the unemployment situation
woud be forgotten and DADT is all any voter woud care about,
because people only care about homosexuals;
thay don 't care about money !!??
farmerman wrote:
The recession seems finally to be breaking up and some clear recovery signs are here. As far as "only caring for homosexuals". I suppose that 40 years ago, you would be accusing me of "only caring for niggers" eh?. Civil rights should be a concern to you I thought.
I doubt that anyone has a right to serve in the military.
I have always been neutral qua "DADT"; I don't care.


farmerman wrote:
(Of course most lawyers display their principals as "malleable for a fee " ).
Yes; if we stop doing that, then criminals can no longer be tried and must be released,
so the new victims better have their guns ready.



farmerman wrote:
I see the CONSERVATIVE radio shills are NOW portraying Obama as A "Sellout" to his base. What hypocrisy these guys peddle.
I dunno. I don 't listen to much radio, but the leftist extremists are yelling that.
Thay were screaming like thay got burned.





David
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:26 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Libertarian revisionism no doubt.
Doesnt take away the fact that Obama would be a shoo-in today.
Seems the GOP doesnt want to be caught denying coverage under the 9/11 act. They just folded . They blocked the 7.4 B over 10 years and approved the 4.2 over 5 years and claimed victory.
Maybe the House will be GOP on Jan 20 but most of Obamas stuff has been p[assed.
I wonder what the GOP will be busy obstructing next year? The DREAM ACT?


OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:35 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Libertarian revisionism no doubt.
Have u ever attended one of our meetings ???


farmerman wrote:
Doesnt take away the fact that Obama would be a shoo-in today.
Dream that if u wanna.
I need not be redundantly repetitive.



farmerman wrote:
Seems the GOP doesnt want to be caught denying coverage under the 9/11 act. They just folded . They blocked the 7.4 B over 10 years and approved the 4.2 over 5 years and claimed victory.
Maybe the House will be GOP on Jan 20 but most of Obamas stuff has been p[assed.
I wonder what the GOP will be busy obstructing next year? The DREAM ACT?
Only a fool woud actually predict an election 2 years early. I know that u did not do that.





David
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  5  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:35 am
What we will have is . . .

Poor players who strut and fret
Their hour upon the stage
And then are heard no more
It will be a tale told by idiots
Full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing . . .


(With apologies to the Bard.)
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:38 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

What we will have is . . .

Poor players who strut and fret
Their hour upon the stage
And then are heard no more
It will be a tale told by idiots
Full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing . . .


(With apologies to the Bard.)
Obama's departure.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:50 am
I know you're kind of slow, David, but i put it in the plural, in order to refer to Republican congressmen . . . wait for an hour or two, the nickel will eventually drop for you . . .
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:54 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
I know you're kind of slow, David, but i put it in the plural, in order to refer to Republican congressmen . . . wait for an hour or two, the nickel will eventually drop for you . . .
It applies to obama's crew, Swifty.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 06:58 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
IF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WERE HELD TODAY WOULD OBAMA SWEEP IT ?
The correct answer is: IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE.

What DOES matter
is what happens over the next 2 years,
particularly qua employment; that and whether
the GOP offers an electable rightwing candidate, like either Dr. Paul.





David
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 07:01 am
@OmSigDAVID,
No David, you don't get to be the dictator you secretly long to be. I'm the one who says what the meaning is of what i write--Bright Boy.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 07:03 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

No David, you don't get to be the dictator you secretly long to be.
I'm the one who says what the meaning is of what i write--Bright Boy.
The HELL, I can't: watch me.
I can interpret the writing any way I want, if it fits.





David
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 07:05 am
You can interpret in one hand and **** in the other to see which one fills up first. Your hysterical, McCarthyite obsession with fantasy allegations about Obama and the Democrats won't change that the Republicans have and will continue to fail the United States.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 23 Dec, 2010 07:13 am

I DO love Joe McCarthy.





David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 10:41:01