The Future President, Donald Trump

We can no longer conveniently blame the South for the rise of bigotry in America — Donald Trump won New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. He was crushing it in California before he became the presumptive nominee. He got this far because people voted him into power.

Now Paul Ryan and every living American President may refuse to support him, but Donald Trump is just one winning election away from having the nuclear codes.

As expected, Democrats are now falling for the same trap his 16 Republican opponents fell for. They are grossly underestimating just how much Trump resonates throughout the country — in part because his appeal just doesn't make sense to them. Trump makes sense to millions, though.

He might also make sense to anarchists — who see a Trump presidency as a shortcut to mass chaos, protest, dissidence, and anger in our nation.

Increasingly, I am hearing voices from many different anarchist and revolutionary communities thinking out loud about exactly what might happen if Trump somehow won the election in November.

Now I would never vote for Donald Trump under any circumstance, but for people who may want to see this country devolve into a horrific state of mass chaos, I think they're right — voting for Donald Trump would send our nation down a path unlike anything we've experienced here before. I think this is why white supremacists, armed militias, and hate groups are so enthusiastic about a Trump presidency — they see what anarchists see — the very real possibility of an ethnic, religious war in which even regular folk decide to choose a side.

Hmmm, sounds like every other politician from either side. Only difference is he is not funded by special interest groups. So it is only the Donald pulling on his own strings.

This may be the better choice of the 2. How many people are pulling on Hillarys strings? Who is she really working for ? You or her special interest groups?

Give me the policy wonk Clinton who understands all of this in great detail.

He made MILLIONS in R/E so I suspect he understands how the economy and the functional system works.

HE likely understands what he is NOT expert in and I suspect he will hire competent folks who do.

Clinton will surround herself with people other tell her to appoint which means we would have another 4 years of the same old cast of characters who got us in the mess we have been in for 30 years.

Trumo is by far not the best choice, but he will shack things up, which might not be a bad thing.

I doubt she will surround herself with the Republicans who drove the Great Recession, but yes, she will likely pull from the team that has given us seven years of growth in the US economy and employment.

Then why is he in the press talking about the US defaulting on its debt, then when people get upset about that, talking about devaluing the currency via "printing money"? It doesn't look like he is bothering with "competent folks", nor does he have a history of listening when smart people give him advice.

If he is lying through his teeth, why would you vote for him?

He never said anything about defaulting, but I suspect that is what you heard.

He never said anything about defaulting, but I suspect that is what you heard.

He might be lying and is likely a tout. Yet I KNOW Hillary is a liar, a criminal, and controlled by special interest on both sides of the aisle who want her in place to protect their power and control.

HE likely understands what he is NOT expert in and I suspect he will hire competent folks who do.

The rest of the world knows and respects Clinton as a successful Secretary of State.

Not paying back your loans in full is defaulting.

Sorry, every financial expert said that asking creditors to take a partial payback or negotiate terms is a default. I know that if Trump asks me to take a partial payment on my savings bonds, I will consider it a default.