Builder
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 04:09 am
@roger,
Quote:
I'm grateful they have finally found a substantial issue to present.


So Benghazi never happened? Okay, if you say so.
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 06:56 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

Quote:
I'm grateful they have finally found a substantial issue to present.


So Benghazi never happened? Okay, if you say so.


Might just be me, but I had hints of sarcasm in Roger's post.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  4  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 01:16 pm
@Builder,
So the 10 or 20 house investigations that found that she dident hire the people who attacked our diplomats dont mean anything?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  5  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 05:09 pm
@Builder,
Who blocked the votes of thousands of people?

126,000 people were removed from voter rolls. We don't know if even 10 of those people removed tried to vote let alone all 126,000 We only know that the voter rolls were reduced when people that didn't vote in previous elections were removed. That doesn't mean Hillary did it and it doesn't mean they were blocked from voting since one has to show up to vote to be prevented from voting by not being on the rolls.
revelette2
 
  2  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 06:51 pm
@roger,
Oh, well, it is Trump. Now he says, it was fantastic Tubman replaced Jackson on the twenty dollar bill but it is pure political correctness. Maybe he is evolving in incremental steps.

roger
 
  1  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 06:57 pm
@Builder,
Yeah, but Hot Sauce is NEW. Doesn't that make it substantial - especially if she lied about it?
snood
 
  3  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 06:57 pm
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:

Oh, well, it is Trump. Now he says, it was fantastic Tubman replaced Jackson on the twenty dollar bill but it is pure political correctness. Maybe he is evolving in incremental steps.

If anything, Trump represents a step backward in evolution. I am ashamed of this country every time I realize he's being taken seriously as being our commander in chief, our representative to the world.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  5  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 06:59 pm
@roger,
Maybe I should mention there isn't a single candidate out there that I want to be president. I really believe Bernie is actually interested in what's best for the country. We don't necessarily share the same vision.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  4  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 07:00 pm
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:

Oh, well, it is Trump. Now he says, it was fantastic Tubman replaced Jackson on the twenty dollar bill but it is pure political correctness. Maybe he is evolving in incremental steps.


And maybe he just got an updated poll.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 07:36 pm
@roger,
He has high paid advisors. I doubt he's ever going to talk again about his racial bigotry or xenophobia.
roger
 
  3  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 07:40 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I'd bet you're wrong, but I haven't the time to watch him.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 07:43 pm
@roger,
Interesting article in the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/23/us/politics/donald-trump-foreign-policy-advisers.html?_r=0

A statement from the article:
Quote:
“It’s always surprising when a member of our relatively tightly knit community is willing to sacrifice their reputation to stand with someone like Donald Trump,” said Danielle Pletka, senior vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.


Emphasis is mine.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  0  
Thu 21 Apr, 2016 11:46 pm
@parados,
Ah, here's the one who claims to know exactly how the US political process actually works. Knock yourself out.

Tell us all why people in a democratic republic have to keep voting, to stay on the electoral roll.

I was under the distinct impression that voting isn't compulsory.

If you have to keep voting to stay enrolled, what does that make it?
roger
 
  2  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 12:48 am
@Builder,
Not quite the same thing. If they hadn't voted, they could have reregistered if they had wanted to - if they had known of the rule. I doubt it was well publicized.
Builder
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 02:16 am
@roger,
So being a citizen doesn't equal being eligible to vote?

You have to register to vote? I've heard you have to actually register as either dem or repug as well; is that right?

roger
 
  4  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 02:38 am
@Builder,
I guess it depends on the state. If you don't want Demokkkrat or Republican, you can be a Green or maybe register as Independent, though I'm not sure independent should be capitalized. Yes, in my state, you have to register a certain time period before the election. Also, you may or may not be allowed to vote outside your party in a primary election. It's up to the state. You may not like it, in which case, you are lucky to live elsewhere.

We are also not required to vote at all.

Sorry about the corrupt spelling of Democrat. I'm just not crazy about repug, repuke, and the various alterations to Clinton, Clinton, and Reagan.
Builder
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 03:34 am
@roger,
If the Don is the best they've got, then repugnant is apt.

I think Dillary is even worse, because of her past, so don't assume I'm keen on the dumbocrats either.

I thought Bernie was independent. He's known as the indy from Vermont.

roger
 
  2  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 04:22 am
@Builder,
You got me there. I have been told Bernie is an Independent running as a Democrat. When you get that figured out, let me know.
maporsche
 
  2  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 06:22 am
@roger,
There's a big argument from Sanders supporters that he's been a democrat all along.

It's all very confusing
parados
 
  4  
Fri 22 Apr, 2016 07:25 am
@Builder,
Quote:

Tell us all why people in a democratic republic have to keep voting, to stay on the electoral roll.

People are supposed to keep their voter registration up to date if they move. Many don't. Even if they register in a new address the new voter location doesn't contact the old voting area to say they should be removed. If someone moves and doesn't get taken off the voter rolls because of a change of address they will be registered in 2, 3, 10 places at the same time.

People die. When people die they typically stop voting. How do you propose the voter rolls be purged of those that have died?


Quote:

If you have to keep voting to stay enrolled, what does that make it?
You don't have to keep voting to stay enrolled. You simply have to have voted at least once in the last 4 years to stay active on the rolls. NY doesn't remove people that are inactive until they have been inactive for another 4 years. You have to have voted in the last 8 years to stay on the rolls.

But you are forgetting this isn't a state run election. It is a party run election administered by the state. Each party can set their own rules which they have done. The parties require the person be registered with the party to vote in their primary. Your complaint is that someone that hasn't voted in an election, let alone a party election should be allowed to vote against party rules isn't about a democratic republic at all. It's about how the parties create their rules. The political parties are not required to be democratic in how they decide their candidates. They just happen to have gone toward that route without going all the way there.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 02/06/2025 at 06:47:05