Brandon9000
 
  -2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 12:36 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Are they rioting or are they protesting peacefully?

Had you looked at the link, you would know that they are blocking streets deliberately to prevent people from driving to the rally site.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 12:37 pm
@Brandon9000,
Does "blocking = rioting?"
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 12:38 pm
@Brandon9000,
That doesn't sound like rioting to me. It reminds me of The Battle Of Cable Street. Now there's a plaque commemorating the brave men and women who stood up to Fascism.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/Battle-of-Cable-Street-red-plaque.png/220px-Battle-of-Cable-Street-red-plaque.png
glitterbag
 
  2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 03:08 pm
@izzythepush,
They aren't rioting, they are disrupting traffic by holding signs and standing in the roadway.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 04:38 pm
@izzythepush,
I wish I had this list on my many visits to London.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_blue_plaques
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  -2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:18 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

That doesn't sound like rioting to me. It reminds me of The Battle Of Cable Street. Now there's a plaque commemorating the brave men and women who stood up to Fascism.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/Battle-of-Cable-Street-red-plaque.png/220px-Battle-of-Cable-Street-red-plaque.png

I never said that they were rioting. I said that they were preventing their fellow citizens from meeting to listen to their candidate. These aren't the brave people who stood up to fascism. These are the brave people who don't believe that people who disagree with them have the right to speak or assemble.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:21 pm
@Brandon9000,
It's my understanding that anyone can speak on any subject at Hyde Park.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:22 pm
@Brandon9000,
Look up: hyde park speakers corner.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:28 pm
@Brandon9000,
People said the same of those who stood up to Moseley.
Brandon9000
 
  -2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:31 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Look up: hyde park speakers corner.

Why? The anti-Trump demonstrators in Arizona were trying to forcibly prevent the cars of Trump supporters from reaching the rally. In America we believe that everyone has the right to speak and assemble. We believe that everyone has the right to enunciate his political views. We don't try to win elections by forcibly stopping the opposition from talking. Were you out sick the day that they covered freedom of speech in school?
Brandon9000
 
  -2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:33 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
People said the same of those who stood up to Moseley.

So, basically, you believe that freedom of speech applies only to you and people who agree with you, right? Everyone else has to be forcibly stopped from speaking?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:34 pm
@Brandon9000,
Almost everybody understands THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. No preaching about it is necessary.
Brandon9000
 
  -2  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:35 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Almost everybody understands THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. No preaching about it is necessary.

Great. Glad to hear it. Then don't try to defend people trying to use force to interfere with Trump's rallies.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 05:43 pm
@Brandon9000,
Quote:
Then don't try to defend people trying to use force to interfere with Trump's rallies.


When did I do that? It's more like Trump inciting violence.

On CNN, Dan Rather Says That Trump's "Inflammatory Language" Should Be Considered Inciting Violence
Dan Rather: "I Covered The Civil Rights Movement [...] This Can Be Very Dangerous"
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 06:05 pm
@Brandon9000,
I wouldn't attempt to defend such Trump like actions.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 07:12 pm
@Brandon9000,
So, it's ok to stifle freedom of speech for the protesters??? Are you sure you understand the concept????
BillRM
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 07:30 pm
@glitterbag,
We all understand that freedom of speech does not allow someone to come on to your private property and interfere with you private meeting by shouting you down.

That is a crime.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 07:33 pm
@BillRM,
One thing about BillRM, he has great imagination. He wrote, "....someone to come on to your private property and interfere with you private meeting by shouting you down."
I just wonder how often this kind of things happen in the US with over 300 million people? LOL
BillRM
 
  1  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 07:39 pm
@cicerone imposter,
How common so if a misdeed is somewhat common then it is ok to do no matter how must such acts interfere with the political processes?
snood
 
  3  
Sat 19 Mar, 2016 07:41 pm
@BillRM,
Protest is PART of the American political process, you scholarly sage, you.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 02/03/2025 at 04:55:04