@Brandon9000,
Quote:I read the original bill and didn't see anything about checking. I would assume that they were talking about a sign or something.
I read the bill as well. The concern is, how the bill could be interpreted, and the article quoted was clear about that.
Quote:...if truly based simply on genitalia, this could have the awkward side-effect of making it a legal requirement to check the vaginas of every woman trying to go to the bathroom, and examine the penis of every man.
Some activists have theorised that to turn trans people away in a compliant manner, the law would technically require the appointment of a ‘genital checker’ at every bathroom seeking to enforce such rules.
Sarah Warbelow of HRC said: “We urge all fair-minded people across the state to demand their lawmakers immediately stop these offensive assaults on fairness and equality, and we call on the Senate to vote down these dangerous measures if they come to a vote on the floor.”
It simply highlights the hypocrisy inherent in the party, as epitomised by the adulation being heaped upon a hypocrite, the likes of Trump. Though not limited to just his record, or actions, of course. Hypocrisy seems rather entrenched.....
If you'd read the article, you might have seen this, right at the end.....
Nick Duffy
5th February 2016, 12:12 PM
Quote:Washington state Republican Graham Hunt, who has led the charge in the anti-trans movement, was recently forced to resign after it emerged details of his military career had been fabricated or embellished.
