TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?!

@OmSigDAVID,

So, you just don't give a **** about their hypocrisy.

Gotcha.

Cycloptichorn

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

I can feel all the love that will permeate our govt until Obama is reelected for his second term.

Because the Senate is not in the hands of the GOP, he cannot pull a Truman,
denouncing a "do-nothing-Republican-Congress".

0 Replies

@Cycloptichorn,

The enemy is hypocrisy.
If the Democrats were not hypocrits,
but adhered to the Constitution, there 'd be no problem.

David

2 Replies

@farmerman,

You and my ex-wife can take turns blowing that little prick as much as you wish, just like you did last night.

A liberaltard love-fest.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

So, you think that the Republicans are not hypocrites for decrying something, then turning right around and doing that same thing? What logic do you base that on?

Cycloptichorn

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

What I CARE about is defending the Original Constitution (as amended, per Article 5).
I wanna appoint judges who will play it straight, NOT cheat.
The liberals want to distort the Constitution,
reducing individual freedom, by LYING about the Constitution.

One liberal, Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg has even explicitly
said that she was influenced by alien law, in her interpretations.

That is illegitimate; a jurisprudential perversity not better than taking bribes.

It still amazes me that this man was a lawyer. If someone were to come out and say that OmSigDavid has all been a joke, that he has been pulling our collective leg, that he was not a lawyer, but just a regular working Joe, or even a small time criminal, I would not be the least bit surprised.

1 Reply

@Cycloptichorn,

Cycloptichorn wrote:

So, you think that the Republicans are not hypocrites for decrying something,
then turning right around and doing that same thing? What logic do you base that on?

Cycloptichorn

I concede your point,
insofar as judicial filibusters per se are concerned.

I was looking at the ultimate fact
of having judges who play it STRAIGHT and call it how it IS,
according to the original intention in 1787, not on how modern leftists wish that it were.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

I was looking at the ultimate fact
of having judges who play it STRAIGHT and call it how it IS,
according to the original intention in 1787, not on how modern leftists wish that it were.

Did I mention, ... oh yes, I guess I did.

0 Replies

@Intrepid,

Thanks, it does bear repeating which is why I brought it here from FB.

0 Replies

@blueveinedthrobber,

Someone actually married waterboy?

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

You have no idea what the Constitution is.

1 Reply

@JTT,

I am among many who do not believe he ever practiced law.

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

You have no idea what the Constitution is.

OK, I 'll play with u: Y do u say that ?

Out of curiosity, have u read it Plain ?

David

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

Well, many won, several lost. A new majority is in the House adna slimmer majority for the Senate Dems.
What effect will the teaparty freshmen have in the government?

I'm expecting sudden, and suddenly sincere calls for bipartisanship and "reaching across the aisle" -- from House Democrats

2 Replies

@roger,

I have yet to see a Republican respond to such a call.

2 Replies

@edgarblythe,

I have yet to see a Democrat mean it. Remember "We won. Get over it"?

1 Reply

@roger,

Some a2k posters may have said that. Never heard it from the ones in government. Actually, Obama tried too hard to bring in Republicans. He kept appointing them and he allowed the health care bill to go to ****. If I had been in Obama's place, I would have ramrodded some stuff through without a thought of compromise while he had a chance.

3 Replies

Sounds like a playground contest.

0 Replies

@edgarblythe,

edgarblythe wrote:

Actually, Obama tried too hard to bring in Republicans.

That's some funny bullshit right there.

1 Reply

@roger,

Sincere? Really?

Did you get that from the president's speech on Wednesday?

I paraphrase:

"We want to hear any idea the Republicans may have and if we haven't already considered them, we're open to discussion."

He created a hole in this invitation that you can drive a truck through.

The Republicans aren't going to come up with ideas they haven't already articulated. He's already "considered" every idea they have, and he's rejected virtually all of them.

This is the guy who told the Republicans that elections have consequences and that he won the one in 2008, and it was a response that most of his supporters cheered.

These same supporters are now insisting that Republicans take a different tact.

It's difficult to expect grace when you show none yourself.

2 Replies

TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?!

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know