Setanta
 
  1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:23 pm
@okie,
Got some proof for that death panel bullshit, Okie? As for governmennt run health care--are you going to tear up your medicare card when the time comes?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:26 pm
@okie,
"Death panels" is the truth? What world do you live in?

Show us where in the new health care reform it describes in any way shape or form, death panels?
I'll wait for your proof or evidence for this, but I know you are full of bull ****.

You are not only a liar, but a small brained conservative who doesn't even live in the real world.

plainoldme
 
  0  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:39 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
When did I ever say I was against freedom?


You must have said at some time that you had no desire to walk around with a six-shooter on your hip. To david, that means you are against individual freedom.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:41 pm
@JTT,
I think david's idea of personal freedom is degradation, slavery and fear.
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:44 pm
@farmerman,
Rush can favor anything he likes: he is the richest of the conservative wind bags. He makes more per annum than the entire US Senate combined.

Just think, he makes his money ruining lives, the planet, the country.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:44 pm
@plainoldme,
OmSig is so whacked out, it's hard to know what he's on about.
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:45 pm
@okie,
Death panels are an old insurance company trick.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:47 pm
@JTT,
He's probably not "on" anything. The snippets of his history point to a paranoid . . . whether the word that generally follows paranoid should apply is an unknown factor.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 07:49 pm
@cicerone imposter,
okie, Is that the best you can do? Give me a thumbs down? You coward!
okie
 
  0  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 08:47 pm
@cicerone imposter,
ci, don't you have more intelligence than to call people names? We both know where the death panel term came from, and we both know it was not manufactured out of thin air. You may not like the term, but it has some connection to reality, given the idea that the government could have some input into who should be treated and who shouldn't, which means ci in case you are slow to catch on, it means you could die quicker if a government bureaucracy decides you ain't worth it compared to somebody else.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 08:51 pm
@okie,
I calls em the way I sees em. You are an idiot.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 08:54 pm
@okie,
okie, I've asked you this before, but since you ignored it the first time, I'll ask again. Please show us where in the health care reform it talks about what you claim; namely "death panels?" Who and when are they going to decide "you ain't worth it" compared to somebody else?

A cut and paste from the health care reform should do it. Just let us know what page and paragraph you copied it from.

Just another case of your rotten brain dreaming up stuff that you can't prove.
farmerman
 
  2  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 09:18 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The death panel scam has finally been admitted to by several in the GOP. It was a tool in the GOPs workbasket of fear mongering and outright lies.

Fareed Zakaria was on Bill Mahers last show and was tormenting newly elected Congressman Issa about the Congressmans phrase to "cut loopholes" in the tax code. Zakaria said
"Lets be accurate, EVery time you say that you will cut all these tax loopholes , you are actually raising taxes.
Issa didnt have any decent response.

GOP is a party with a really good propaganda and jingle making arm .
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 09:53 pm
@farmerman,
okie continues to say things that he can't back up with evidence, and I will continue to challenge him on "all" of them.

The problem with our country is that these outright lies are not challenged by many, and people begin to believe them. I'm trying to do my small part in destroying people like okie who continues to spread lies and innuendos about our economy and politics. He doesn't answer my direct questions - even when I repeat them. He's a coward and a fraud.

okie demands apologies and civil discourse based on his bull ****; it ain't gonna happen.
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Mon 8 Nov, 2010 11:42 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Millions!
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Tue 9 Nov, 2010 03:13 am
I think that these baseless slogans that surround much of the teaparty rhetoric should be challenged repeatedly. Weve been too involved looking at the teaparty as a phenomenon. It needs to be challenged on its laxck of credibility.
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Tue 9 Nov, 2010 04:05 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

If someone knocks on your door and demands you leave the US, by all means introduce them to whatever firearm you may have, but, unless I missed the post, no one on this thread has insisted you leave.

It's a bit tough to lay claim to a passion for freedom when one is OK with left-wing policies.


[/quote}

in your opinion.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Tue 9 Nov, 2010 04:06 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
i believe ci was invited to go live in N Korea just a page or two back.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Tue 9 Nov, 2010 06:19 am
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
I wish every goddam tough guy who wants we filthy freedom hating individuals to move to another country would get their sacks up, come to my home and attempt to send me on my way. They would learn that they don't have a monopoly on being willing to blow someone's ******* brains out, and I'm not the only "liberal" who would pursue that course of acton.
I deal with filthy freedom hating individuals on an INDIVIDUAL basis,
as I did in this case. (For instance, I thought it was a very fine idea indeed to electrocute the Rosenbergs,
but I did not apply that to the filthy freedom hating Stalin-loving individual [Comrade Murray]
who lived next door to me, at the time.) He survived in peace. (He still owes me money for babysitting his dog,
Comrade Hasty; I'm almost about ready to give up hope.)

There is a big difference between giving Comrade C.I. some travel advice (ordinary free speech)
and going to his or to your house and physically force the issue.
There r major moral and legal considerations with the latter, that do not attend the former.

Offhand, I don 't remember u saying anything that led to a similar conclusion.

U get to conserve your ammunition.

I hope your back feels better.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Tue 9 Nov, 2010 06:28 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
I calls em the way I sees em. You are an idiot.
His definition of an idiot is those who don 't agree with HIM.





David
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/20/2024 at 09:39:46