25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2013 11:00 am
@firefly,
bullshit, the codes tend to be in direct violation of students cheating and drinking habits, not to mention speach habits (now that "offensive" speech is a code violation)....if universities threw out everyone who violated their codes campusses would be ghost towns. everyone to include the universities treat codes of conduct as wish lists rather than demands, using them as excuse to man men whos sexual behavior offends a woman is unjust.
firefly
 
  3  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2013 11:19 am
@hawkeye10,
Why are some of these college men displaying offensive sexual behaviors, and illegal sexual behaviors, toward other students? And, why should such inappropriate behavior be tolerated on a campus?

If you knew any college administrators, and I do, you'd know that codes of conduct are not "wish lists".
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2013 11:30 am
Somehow trusting a college to be sane when dealing with hot button issues such as sexual or in the case below racial harassment is asking a lot.


Quote:


http://thefire.org/case/760.htm

"Political Correctness vs. Freedom of Thought - The Keith John Sampson Story," February 27, 2009: One of FIRE's most shocking cases in 2008 was that of Keith John Sampson, a student-employee at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) who was found guilty of racial harassment for merely reading the book Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klan during his work breaks. Thanks to FIRE's involvement and the extensive media coverage of the case, the finding against Sampson was eventually overturned and his school record was cleared, but the story behind this incident is still disturbing months later. Filmmaker Andrew Marcus has produced a short documentary on Sampson's case in the hopes of restoring his reputation and bringing to light the incidents of censorship that are all too common on college campuses today.
"IUPUI's Schneider Finally Admits No Harassing Actions in anti-KKK Book Case," July 21, 2008: Townhall.com columnist Mike Adams has procured a "no" from Rich Schneider, the IUPUI official who apparently accused student-employee Keith John Sampson of "harassing behavior," on the question of whether Sampson engaged in any racially harassing actions whatsoever at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis.
"FIRE letter to IUPUI Chancellor Charles R. Bantz," July 17, 2008
"Letter from IUPUI Chancellor Charles R. Bantz to Keith John Sampson," July 11, 2008
"Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis Attacks Student Cleared of Racial Harassment," July 8, 2008: Two months ago, in the face of withering public criticism, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) revoked its original finding that student-employee Keith John Sampson had committed racial harassment by reading a book at work that celebrated the defeat of the Ku Klux Klan in a 1924 street brawl. Now, IUPUI is claiming that Sampson was in fact punished for some other behavior, but the school refuses to reveal any details of this alleged conduct. FIRE is calling on IUPUI to either reveal and prove this alleged offense or stop publicly smearing its own student.
"Victory at IUPUI: Student-Employee Found Guilty of Racial Harassment for Reading a Book Now Cleared of All Charges," May 1, 2008: Administrators at Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis have revoked their finding that a student-employee was guilty of racial harassment merely for publicly reading the book Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klan. Following pressure from FIRE, IUPUI has declared that Keith John Sampson's record is clear and said it will reexamine its affirmative action procedures relating to internal complaints.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2013 11:33 am
Quote:
Vanderbilt examines its response in wake of rape case
Tony Gonzalez,
The Tennesseean
September 15, 2013

(THE TENNESSEAN) David Williams has had to ask himself some troubling questions in the past two months.

Could he and the Vanderbilt University athletics department have done something to prevent the sexual assault of a student on campus in June? Did his coaches miss warning signs when they recruited the four former football players who now stand indicted on rape charges?

The easier question, said Williams, vice chancellor of university affairs and athletics, was deciding what to do with the four student-athletes after he heard what they were accused of doing.

"There's nothing bad about the program. Is there something about those four kids who made a bad decision, a terrible decision? Absolutely. And based on that, we immediately separated them from this department," Williams said.

Four former players are charged in the rape of a 21-year-old student, and one suspended player and two men in California were charged for what police said was an attempt to cover up the assault. All four accused of rape have pleaded not guilty, and differences in their bond amounts suggest their circumstances may not be identical.

Suspended player Chris Boyd pleaded guilty Friday to a misdemeanor charge of trying to help cover up the crime after it happened. Authorities said he helped carry the victim from a hallway to a dorm room, and exchanged text messages with the men charged with rape in which he encouraged them to conceal what happened. He remained suspended after the hearing but is still allowed to attend classes on athletic scholarship.

In the aftermath, Williams has examined recruiting practices and the athletics department's assault prevention programs for student-athletes. While defending what was already in place, he has scheduled new presentations, invited recent graduates to give talks about decision-making, and sat down with leaders of other sexual assault prevention programs on campus and in the city.

"You hope and you search your soul to make sure that there was nothing in the background that you missed. And we've done that. We don't see anything we've missed," Williams said. "You always question whether or not you've done enough, and whether or not you've set in motion the education process so that people learn how they should behave."

Williams said he first heard about an incident in Gillette House late on Monday, June 24, as part of his staff's usual checks on what student-athletes did over the weekend. He said early information didn't involve the men eventually charged.

By the next morning, more sinister details were beginning to emerge. Williams said Coach James Franklin had decided to suspend the players from the team, but Williams, with broader authority, had already taken that a step further, banning them from campus.

Williams hasn't gathered the coaches to discuss the rape case in detail. But he has reminded many of them of their responsibility to lead, and to remember "what our values are."

He also went back over the mountain of notes and records pertaining to the four players' recruitment in an effort to find anything he might have missed.

"We looked back at these four kids, and we didn't have any indications," he said.

Williams' message to coaches has been to "keep digging" for information with all recruits.

"We don't stand for thugs and criminals to be part of this program," he said. "And if we make a mistake and a kid comes in here and they are of that type, we are basically going to put them out. And that has not changed."

A Vanderbilt spokeswoman said about two students each year, from among a student-athlete population of about 340, have been dismissed from the athletics department because of misconduct, for reasons that include repeat alcohol violations, drug violations and fights.

Indicted tight end Brandon Vandenburg, who police said lived in the dorm room where the assault took place — and who faces five counts of rape and additional charges of unlawful pornography and tampering with evidence — transferred to Vanderbilt from College of the Desert in Palm Desert, Calif.

The California college's team is currently barred from play by the Southern California Football Association for violations of rules on giving perks to players. That finding followed an investigation by The Desert Sun newspaper into a string of player arrests and incidents. Those included the fatal shooting of a player by a sheriff's deputy during a burglary, a near-fatal stabbing of one player by another and dozens of other crimes.

Williams said Vanderbilt does not often recruit from junior colleges like College of the Desert, but that Vandenburg cleared Vanderbilt's screening process. He hasn't advised Franklin one way or the other on recruiting there.

"We'd be more interested in what the kid did or did not do," he said.

As the department has regrouped, Williams has warned athletes that what they do going forward will be watched and questioned. But they'll also have a platform to raise awareness about sexual assault.

"You want to get the message out about how bad this is, how this is not what we do in a caring community — a caring society — and that we want to do all we can to make sure this is a safe campus."

The most visible display took place during the football team's home opener, when players and coaches wore green dot stickers during a nationally televised game as a show of support for Vanderbilt's sexual assault prevention program.

The Green Dot program, in place at more than 100 colleges and universities, tries to raise awareness about the prevalence of sexual assault, and then methodically convince students and staff to take responsibility for defending against it. That can mean speaking up when someone says something demeaning, or intervening in a volatile situation.

Williams said every student-athlete and all athletics department staffers, himself included, will go through the Green Dot training.

That's an unusual move among participating colleges — and the presence of the green dots on national television was also unprecedented — said Jennifer Messina, director of training for Green Dot Inc.

"Anybody who has some natural social influence, with influence comes responsibility," she said. "This is a fabulous opportunity to lead on an issue."

The athletics department has mobilized in other ways as well.

In the past week, Williams met with the new director of the university's Margaret Cuninggim Women's Center. Next week, he'll meet with the YWCA of Nashville & Middle Tennessee about its anti-violence campaign aimed specifically at men.

Those efforts would be in addition to annual leadership retreats for student-athletes and periodic talks by guest speakers. In 2011, a convicted rapist spoke to students about his life-changing conviction and life after prison.

But one effort has fallen away.

Athletes Against Assault, formed in 2007 amid much fanfare, paired Vanderbilt athletes with the women's center to host and participate in assault awareness events. The group disbanded two years later, leaving some of the founding members — now alumni — to wonder why.

"You'd think you wouldn't want to stop an effort to raise that kind of awareness," said professional golfer and 2008 graduate Leibelei Lawrence.

Lawrence, a founding member of Athletes Against Assault, said the student-athletes wanted to use their prominent positions on campus to teach students how to recognize sexual misconduct, spread ideas for preventing assault and create an atmosphere that would support victims who come forward.

She said the message was one athletes need to hear.

"A lot of athletes, especially male athletes, are more confident, they're more arrogant, they might joke around more," she said. "Words turn into actions, and they need to change the way they think about certain things. I think this applies to athletes, but it applies to everybody."

Athletes Against Assault put on a play about sex trafficking, asked peers to sign pledges and walked with sexual assault survivors during a Take Back the Night event. Jessica Smith, a lacrosse player and group member who graduated in 2009, remembers hearing survivors share their stories that night.

"Knowledge is power," she said, "and really being able to understand what it was like for these people and giving them a venue to speak out about it was just really powerful."

Williams, the athletics director, said he doesn't expect the conversation about sexual assault to die down anytime soon. But he also knows this: The questions he's been asking himself about what he and the university can be doing aren't about to go away, either.
http://www.wbir.com/story/news/local/2013/09/15/vanderbilt-examines-its-response-in-wake-of-rape-case/2816699/
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 18 Sep, 2013 12:21 pm
@firefly,
wait, guys now get thrown off the team for misdemeanors??!! wow, puritanism is now back even worse than I thought.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 05:36 pm
@hawkeye10,
You know when AOL was having strict rules that was being enforced by customers getting lower rates for themselves, I remember people crying over being unfairly ban from their service after getting three TOS from these customers/censors.

My attitude is why the hell would you give your business and $$$$ to such a service and that go even more so then you and or your family are paying thirty thousands a year to go to some private university?

If a university wish to be a beacon of anti-male sexual correct PC, I would assume the word would get out and people would picked saner universities to go to.

Of course if they try to kicked someone out in the middle of a semester over such silliness I can see taking legal actions against them to be make at least financially whole.

An if the crazies such as Firefly had gotten control of a tax payers supported university that is a horse of another color.
hawkeye10
 
  2  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 05:44 pm
@BillRM,
foodball players at least, who work for free while making the university gobs of cash. most men dont have any leverage with the university, a good share of them dont even have the academics to be at the university and are on campus in the first place only because of quotas. also a lot of young men are like dogs who have been beaten a few times too many.....if a woman starts talking about their bad behavior they will not even question the judgment.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 06:25 pm
http://www.clevescene.com/binary/9260/1379356417-steubenvillerapesign.jpg
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 06:56 pm
@firefly,
rape enabler: one who is not sufficiently hostile towards men.

like the word rape this term has had its meaning expanded to the extent that most meaning has been lost. back in the day a rape enenabler was one who lured a woman into a rape or who stood guard over the door during a rape, bad behavior that can not be stopped by the internet.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 06:57 pm
Quote:
The New York Times
September 20, 2013
Navy Hearing In Rape Case Raises Alarm

By JENNIFER STEINHAUER

WASHINGTON — For roughly 30 hours over several days, defense lawyers for three former United States Naval Academy football players grilled a female midshipman about her sexual habits. In a public hearing, they asked the woman, who has accused the three athletes of raping her, whether she wore a bra, how wide she opened her mouth during oral sex and whether she had apologized to another midshipman with whom she had intercourse “for being a ho.”

The aggressive tactics on display this month and last are part of a case that has generated intense public scrutiny and raised alarms about what are called Article 32 proceedings, which help determine whether cases are sent to courts-martial. Article 32 hearings permit questions not allowed in civilian courts and can include cross-examinations of witnesses so intense that legal experts say they frighten many victims from coming forward.

“These have become their own trials,” said Jonathan Lurie, a professor emeritus of legal history at Rutgers University and the author of two books on military justice. “If this is what Article 32 has come to be, then it is time to either get rid of it or put real restrictions on the conduct during them.”

More broadly, the case at the Naval Academy illuminates what critics say is wrong with trying sexual assault cases in the current military justice system, which is under scrutiny in Congress. One bill to be debated this fall, sponsored by Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, would take the prosecution of sexual assault cases outside a victim’s chain of command, with a goal of increasing the number of people who report crimes without fear of retaliation.

In the coming weeks, the military judge who presided over the female midshipman’s hearing will send a recommendation to the Naval Academy’s superintendent on how the charges should be disposed of. The superintendent, Vice Adm. Michael H. Miller, will ultimately decide whether to move ahead with a court-martial or drop the case.

Increased scrutiny of the problem of sexual assault in the military, combined with more reporting of attacks, has led to a large jump in the number of such cases that have gone to court-martial. The Defense Department says that 68 percent of sexual assault cases were sent to court-martial last year, compared with 30 percent in 2007.

But those increases have been accompanied by a series of controversies that have roiled the system, including one at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas in which more than 40 female trainees were abused by their instructors, as well as the arrest in May of the director of the Air Force’s sexual response unit, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski, for what the police said was his groping of a woman he did not know in a parking lot. A recent Pentagon survey found that an estimated 26,000 sexual assaults took place in the military last year, up from 19,000 two years before.

The Naval Academy case stems from a 2012 “yoga and toga” off-campus party near the academy in Annapolis, Md., where the woman, then a 20-year-old sophomore, arrived intoxicated and continued to drink, she said. In testimony at the hearing, held at the Washington Navy Yard, she said she had no memory of parts of the evening and may have passed out.

The next day, the woman testified, she heard from a friend of one of the three football players via social media that she had had sex with them at an Annapolis home known as “the football house.” The football players — Tra’ves Bush, 22; Eric Graham, 21; and Joshua Tate, 21 — were charged with sexually assaulting her and making false statements. The investigation was stymied in part by the woman’s initial refusal to cooperate, academy officials said.

In the Article 32 cross-examination, defense lawyers repeatedly asked the midshipman about a consensual sexual encounter she said she had the next day. In some of the most widely disseminated testimony, Andrew Weinstein, a lawyer for Mr. Bush, asked the woman whether she wore a bra or other underwear to the party and whether she “felt like a ho” afterward. Lt. Cmdr. Angela Tang, a lawyer for Mr. Graham, also asked the woman repeatedly about her oral sex technique, arguing over objections from the prosecution that oral sex would indicate the “active participation” of the woman and therefore consent.

Many military legal experts were appalled by what they heard. “What this case shows is that we think the military justice system can somehow solve the sexual assault problem, but it can’t,” said Diane H. Mazur, an emeritus law professor at the University of Florida. Several military justice experts said Article 32 proceedings should be eliminated.

But Defense Department officials, as well as lawyers and other supporters of the current system, say that Article 32 proceedings can help victims and offer reasonable protections to those accused of crimes.

“The purpose of the Article 32 hearing is twofold,” said Victor M. Hansen, a former military lawyer who is now an associate dean at the New England School of Law in Boston. “One is to ensure there is sufficient evidence to go to trial, and it provides an opportunity for the defense to discover evidence. The prosecution also might want the victim to have a dry run. So there are some advantages there for victims.”

But Mr. Hansen said the process could be changed to look more like proceedings for civilian rape trials, in which questions about a woman’s sexual techniques would not be allowed. In civilian courts, rape shield laws either prohibit or limit questions about a woman’s sexual history.

Susan Burke, the lawyer for the female midshipman, has filed a federal lawsuit seeking to strip the authority of the Naval Academy’s superintendent over the case. The superintendent does not attend the proceedings, but he decides whether to send a case to a court-martial, determines who serves on the court-martial jury and has the power to uphold or overturn the jury’s findings.

“I have been contacted by many, many rape victims told they had to go through this abusive process,” Ms. Burke said. “One of the complexities is they are forced to go through this, but the decision maker is not in the room.”

The Joint Service Committee on Military Justice, which reviews potential changes to military law, is considering a proposal that would give sexual assault victims in Article 32 hearings new protections to shield them from the kind of questioning the midshipman experienced.

The measure has picked up the support of several prominent retired generals, including Lt. Gen. Claudia Kennedy, who in 1997 became the first woman to reach the rank of three-star general, and Brig. Gen. Loree K. Sutton, who served as the highest-ranking psychiatrist in the Army.

“What we have now is a deepening erosion of trust in the military,” General Sutton said. “There is no doubt in my mind that our senior leadership are concerned about this. What I am less confident about is that they know what it takes to fix the problem.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/21/us/intrusive-grilling-in-rape-case-raises-alarm-on-military-hearings.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 07:06 pm
Quote:
From praying to preying? Pastor accused of raping his parishioners
By Tom Watkins, CNN
September 20, 2013

CNN) -- It would not be surprising for an associate pastor to pray with his parishioners.

But Jorge Juan Castro wound up preying on them instead, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said Friday. He is accused of raping more than 20 women, many of whom are Spanish-speaking, undocumented immigrants.

The alleged abuse began in October 2004, shortly after Castro took a job as associate pastor at Las Buenas Nuevas Church in Norwalk, and continued until September 2012, the department said in a news release.

Castro was arrested last Friday at his home in Norwalk and was being held in Los Angeles County Jail in lieu of $2 million bail.

The allegations came to light when the women, ages 18 to 39, implicated Castro to a third party who then told detectives, authorities said.

The alleged incidents began in October 2004 and continued until September 2012.

During that time, Castro was working as an associate pastor and counselor at Las Buenas Nuevas Church in Norwalk, the department said.

"The suspect allegedly preyed upon the victims' vulnerability," the news release said. "He did this by invoking fear by threatening to tell the victims if they reported him he would have the victims deported, while additionally threatening to expose the victims to public embarrassment and ridicule."

Castro was booked on an arrest warrant listing six felony charges of rape, oral copulation and penetration by a foreign object, authorities said.

Detectives from the county's Special Victims Bureau were asking for help from the public in identifying any other possible victims.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/20/justice/pastor-immigrants-rape/
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 07:35 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
rape enenabler was one who lured a woman into a rape or who stood guard over the door during a rape, bad behavior that can not be stopped by the internet...

The internet hacktavist group Anonymous (who wear Guy Fawkes masks) does use the internet to try to expose these criminals. They (a sub-group of Anonymous known as KnightSec) were active in that manner in the Steubenville rape case.



BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 08:11 pm
@hawkeye10,
You know Hawkeye one real problem is when a student is charge with something that could be consider both a criminal offense and a student code violation.

No lawyer is going to suggest that you show up and defend yourself before a PC
university kangaroo court if there are any chance that somewhere down the road a criminal case or even a civil suit might be file.

Talk about being between the rock and the hard place if some bimbo, for example like the one who charged the West Point cadet with rape after jumping into bed with him as he was sleeping and having sex with him, charge a male student with a conduct code violation that could turn into a criminal case.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 09:34 pm
@BillRM,
ya, defending youself from a female charge at university is going to be like demanding a trial......"do you really want to roll the dice pal? go away quickly and quietly". Americans excel at bullying, it is an art form with the bosses.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 10:46 pm
Quote:
LSU law student booked on rape count
By Jim Mustian
September 19, 2013

Baton Rouge police officers arrested a third-year LSU law student on campus Wednesday morning accused of raping a woman at his home over the weekend.

Abdellatif De Vol, 25, 2232 Terrace St., was booked into East Baton Rouge Parish Prison on one count of forcible rape. Officers took him into custody at the law center before the beginning of an intellectual property class.

A 26-year-old woman told detectives she had gone out drinking with De Vol late Friday and was invited back to his home for more drinks. She said she told De Vol she wasn’t interested in having sex, but that he became aggressive and began removing her clothes, according to an affidavit of probable cause.

The woman later went to the hospital with scratches that were consistent with a sexual assault, the arrest document says.

She later placed a “controlled phone call” — which was recorded — to De Vol, asking him about the nonconsensual sex, the affidavit says, “to which the defendant replied he was sorry.”


Quote:
New rape counts posted against LSU law student; considered a flight risk
By Ben Wallace
September 20, 2013

An LSU law student arrested Wednesday faces additional rape counts in both the initial alleged rape and a separate incident that allegedly occurred almost exactly one year ago involving a different woman.

Abdellatif E. Devol, 25, a third-year law student, was arrested Wednesday outside of an intellectual property class on an accusation of raping a 26-year-old woman at his home Sept. 13, authorities have said.

Devol now faces a count each of forcible rape and simple rape in the incident last weekend, in addition to a count each of attempted forcible rape and sexual battery in a September 2012 incident.

Detectives have not ruled out the possibility that additional victims will come forward, said Cpl. Don Coppola Jr., a police spokesman.

After seeing media reports about Devol’s arrest Wednesday, another woman came forward and told police that Devol sexually assaulted and attempted to rape her after they met at a tailgate on LSU’s campus in 2012, Baton Rouge police said.

In that instance, Devol is accused of bringing the woman, 24, back to his residence, which at the time was an apartment in the 3000 block of July Street, according to an arrest warrant.

Devol became increasingly aggressive, the warrant says, including allegedly throwing the woman on his bed. The woman tried to flee, but failed to get away before Devol grabbed her, took her back to the bed and began removing her clothes, the warrant says.

The woman told detectives that she began telling Devol to stop, and that she didn’t want to have sex, but that it didn’t stop him from touching her inappropriately, the warrant says.

The victim told detectives that Devol then got up to put on a condom, and that’s when she escaped, the warrant says.

In the second development, Devol is facing a count of simple rape after being accused of raping the 26-year-old woman a second time at the victim’s residence a few hours after the initial incident, according to an affidavit of probable cause.

In parish court filings, prosecutors have identified Devol as a “realistic flight risk” for several reasons: He has wealthy family in Egypt, no real family ties in the U.S. and no intention of remaining in America upon the expected completion of law school.

Devol is being held in East Baton Rouge Parish Prison on a total bond of $160,000, prison records show.

http://theadvocate.com/home/7115289-125/new-rape-counts-posted-against
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 11:17 pm
Quote:
Playboy's party college list gets an anti-rape update thanks to spoof website highlighting the issue of sexual assault on campuses

Playboy magazine publishes an annual list of the best 'party colleges'
On Tuesday, anti-rape activist group FORCE created a parody website that turned the yearly ranking into a platform for promoting the importance of sexual consent


By Margot Peppers
September, 19 2013

Playboy's annual party college list was spoofed by a group of activists on Tuesday, who created a fake website highlighting the importance of practicing consensual sex.

PartyWithPlayboy.com featured a list of the 'Top Ten Party Commandments' on how to have a 'consensual good time', parodying the magazine's annual list of the Top Ten Party Colleges.

While many believed the magazine run by Hugh Hefner was responsible for the site, it was actually a hoax launched by anti-rape group FORCE, with the aim of opening up a dialogue about the prevalence of sexual assault on college campuses.

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/190gtz35q280gpng/ku-xlarge.png

Playboy's annual party school list examines the colleges with reputations for partying cultures and the most drug and alcohol use.

In reaction against partying culture which leads to sexual assault, FORCE - along with students from 25 colleges across the country - created a parody website that looked exactly like the Playboy one, with a focus on the issue of rape culture.

'Over the years, it has been brought to our attention that some of our long-standing party picks have a not-so-toast-worthy, rape-ridden side to their campus life,' read the fake website.

'Rape is kryptonite to sexual pleasure. The two cannot co-exist. For our revised party guide to live up to our founder’s vision, we had to put a new criterion on top. Namely, consent.'

Responses to the 'updated' list were overwhelmingly positive, with the website going viral within hours and news sites praising Playboy for their 'progressive' new stance.

One of the 'commandments' listed on the fake website read: 'Ask first. . . consent is not just sexy. It's necessary.'

Another said: '[Don't] take advantage of sloshed persons. . . because drunk does not equal consent.'

Along with the fake Playboy website, the activists also posted fake news stories about it on Huffington Post and BroBible.com, with students who were involved linking to it via Twitter and Facebook.

And they evidently achieved their goal of sparking up an important conversation about consent.

According to a release from FORCE, each of the hoax websites received over 3,000 hits an hour on Tuesday, and the fake Huffington Post site garnered more than 5,000 Facebook likes.

'With one in four female undergrads being assaulted while they are in school, obtaining a bachelor's degree in this country comes with an untenable high level of violence,' says the e-mail release.

'All college students, male, female and gender queer, deserve better.'

While writers at BroBible wrote that they 'agree with the overall messaging' that the hoax promoted, Playboy has asked that the website be taken down.

'The politics of Playboy and women’s bodies is really complicated and something that we thought about a lot,' FORCE co-founder Rebecca Nagle told MailOnline.

'One reason we used Playboy as a platform is that I think it's important for these messages to come from men and not just women.'

Rebecca also explained that the fact so many readers believed the Playboy website was real means that the company has the capability - and the responsibility - to promote such a message.

Indeed, Katya Palsi, a student at Rowan University who helped with the hoax, said in a release: 'Our culture needs influential leaders, like Playboy and other enterprises, to step up and change the conversation.

'The excitement generated by this just shows how ready we are as a society for a cultural shift.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2424675/Playboys-party-college-list-gets-anti-rape-update-thanks-spoof-website-highlighting-issue-sexual-assault-campuses.html#ixzz2fV35VfQz
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 11:17 pm
@firefly,
I liked the old days better when we could know that "rape" actually involved penetration. any bets on the first year that playfully swatting a womans ass without a signed consent form will earn a rape charge?

but let this be a lesson, just as when you are involved in an auto accident never ever say that you are sorry or admitt to anything. in fact never say a word without legal representation.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 11:30 pm
@firefly,
I have no problem with nailing people who were actively part of a rape rape even if they never touched the woman. but today anyone who so much as questions the feminists conceptualization of rape is called a rape apologist/enabler. those who go after "rape enablers" are almost always bullies who need tk be put down with vigour.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 11:42 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
today anyone who so much as questions the feminists conceptualization if rape is called a rape apologist/

We are not talking about "feminists conceptualizations of rape". We have rape laws in every state. Try reading the sexual assault laws of your state since you seem to need clarification on how the crime of rape is defined.

"Rape apologists" are those who try to excuse the behavior of individuals who commit such crimes, often by blaming the victim for the acts of the rapist.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 20 Sep, 2013 11:47 pm
@firefly,
right, those who question the states sex laws are by definition rape apologists, and never mind that "rape" is now an almost meaningless term. it is all gamesmanship from bullies and liars.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2025 at 09:58:20