@Arella Mae,
Have you noticed that they can't respect or address the notion of "consent" even when the issue has nothing to do with sexual assault?
They get all in a twitter about whether the man should be charged with a felony, the intrusion of the government into people's lives, etc. but ignore the very basic issue that the man did not have his wife's consent to read her e-mails or to use the information contained in them.
Consent is the defining factor in many different types of crimes, and not just sexual assaults. It is what helps to protect one individual from being violated by another, whether that violation involves the theft of property, or invasion of privacy, or intrusion of one's body. What makes these things crimes is that consent was not given by the victim--the actions of the other person were not done by mutual agreement, they were unwanted. The ability of a person to give or withhold consent is a powerful protector of basic civil rights, rights which are of necessity backed up by laws.
I guess that those who want to trivialize the importance of consent in sexual activity are inclined to disregard consent in other situations as well. They simply don't respect the rights of others--including the
legal rights of others.
Someone should also tell Hawkeye it is already illegal for him to open his wife's regular mail without her consent. I guess that's just another one of those pesky laws he disregards while he's busy worrying about the government violating
his rights.