25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:26 am
@firefly,
Quote:
That's the imaginary scapegoat you hide behind rather than acknowledging that the majority of all women want these things.
And the majority of Arab men want women atoned for being raped. Your version is no better, it is just paranoid about men instead of women.
Quote:
Besides, polygraphs are not admissible in court. Some rape victims have voluntarily taken polygraphs, and wanted the results presented in court, but they weren't allowed into evidence.
Mental illness can hide poly graph readings. 1 in 5.....
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:28 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
How many links do you need to post that prove that such meanings of rape is in effect in many states of the US NOW and that men are NOW sitting in prison because of them?

Plus the rape feminist storm troopers are out in force "educating" on rape. I am of the opinion that any definition of rape they use is fair game for me to use, which I gladly do because it instantly shows how radical they are, and where they want to take the law. Also, as anybody who has the first understanding of the law knows, the written law is only a small part of "THE LAW" as how the law is interpreted and how the DA's choose to use the law makes a huge amount of difference in the end result. For instance who would have ever dreamed that sex law intended to address child porn would be used to nail kids for sexting, or a stat rape charge of a 17 year old would be used to nail a guy who had some minor negative interaction with a girl named Phoebe Prince who decided to kill herself and thus someone decided that this kid needed to be punished because of her choice to die. DA's are a very inventive group when they decide to go charge shopping, which sadly has become routine. The written words in a law book are but a hurdles to get around when there are bad guys to hammer, in this american justice system that has been brought to its knees though multiple rounds of abuse at the hands of do gooders out to impose their will upon the rest of us.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:30 am
@Ionus,
Quote:
Besides, polygraphs are not admissible in court. Some rape victims have voluntarily taken polygraphs, and wanted the results presented in court, but they weren't allowed into evidence.


Firefly know however that they can be used to screen out false charges in a faster manner something she does not wish to see happen for some strange reason.
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:31 am
@firefly,
Quote:
It has always been non consensual sexual intercourse.
The Air Force found 60% of convictions were where the woman lied. Of course you dont care...thats only men and their families being torn apart. It s not like is was women and THEIR families. I hope you have a male relative who goes up on false rape charges and gets convicted. How do you like them apples ?
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:34 am
@Ionus,
Quote:
I hope you have a male relative who goes up on false rape charges and gets convicted. How do you like them apples ?


It hardly take a conviction to ruin a man life for the most part just being charge with this crime on the public record will do that.

That is even more true now that we all live in the age of Google searches.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:36 am
@BillRM,
I think the reason is obvious. Put more men into prison, guilty or not. They get raped, come out of prison with a much higher chance of raping women when they come out. More raped women means more frightened women, more frightened women means more women prepared to give other women a try...see if that works out.....end result she has a greater chance of getting laid by a woman !
BillRM
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:39 am
@Ionus,
Hell did you miss in her postings that at one point in her life she was a prison guard?


Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 05:44 am
@BillRM,
Yes I did miss that...I arrived relatively late....so more people in prison means a promotion.....plus I wouldnt trust a female guard at a female prison anymore than I would a Catholic priest with altar boys.
Intrepid
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 08:56 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
You have a very unrealistic and warped view of life. You must have missed out on a lot over the years to have come to the conclusions that you do.
How many pages do your sex scripts run? Do you sign them? We cant be bothered, we make it up as we go.


I am getting used to you not making sense. What you wrote above does not make sense so I am not disappointed nor surprised.
BillRM
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 08:58 am
@Ionus,
Ionus she will not also answer the question of if she is now earning a living by being part of the “anti-rape” industry in some manner or other however, I would bet even money that she is now doing so.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 08:59 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Quote:
Only idiots would base everything on sight alone.
So according to you, it is grossly unfair to charge men with rape if the woman has several personalities ? What about bi-polar ? How do you tell the diference between excited to see you and just plain excited ? Just how does someone as stupid as you tell the mental health of a woman before he sleeps with them ? Ask them ?

Dickhead.


No, NOT according to me. Because, I did not say that.

Dickhead? Is that your new signature? It does seem to suit.

Intrepid
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:00 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Quote:
If your wife was to read all your posts would she consent and agree with you?
What happened to marriage vows ? I promise ...unless I dont want to, in which case you still have to live up to your vows....women are equal after all.


You seem to have the IQ of a walnut. What do marriage vows have to do with a wife reading the garbage that her husband posts? Are you saying that because of marriage vows she must agree with him? Shocked
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:02 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Quote:
Can you read the title of the thread? Thought not.
So you want everyone to answer yes or no to the question whilst more painful horror stories are feasted on by women who just think rape is sooooo terrible they have to read it.

Dickhead.


I see that you are still signing your posts as Dickhead.

It is not a question of yes or no. My post was in response to the fact that you thought the discussion should change to male rape. The topic is in the thread title.

I changed my mind. A walnut has a higher IQ than you do.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:03 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

Quote:
You have a very unrealistic and warped view of life. You must have missed out on a lot over the years to have come to the conclusions that you do.
That is your opinion and it is less valuable then toilet paper.


Given the value of toilet paper in the civilized world, I will take that as a compliment.

P.S.
I assume that you meant than.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:11 am

I 'd like to offer the opinion
that it is saddening that this topic is discussed with so much rancor
and with so little civility. I suggest (humbly) that everyone consider
analyzing the merit of the posted subject matter, rather than the value of the person who posted it.

Its better not to kill the messenger, nor the horse he rode in on.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:13 am
@Intrepid,
Ionus wrote:

Quote:
You have a very unrealistic and warped view of life.
You must have missed out on a lot over the years to have come to the conclusions that you do.
That is your opinion and it is less valuable then toilet paper.
Intrepid wrote:


Given the value of toilet paper in the civilized world, I will take that as a compliment.

P.S.
I assume that you meant than.
Good point; people keep making that error.





David
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:16 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I'm glad that you came to such compassionate sentiments as it's not this thoughtful behavior that you were displaying one or two years ago..

Dasein
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:19 am
@Izzie,
I applaud you for biting your tongue, But I don't think the word "amaze" is what you were looking for. Without putting words in to your mouth maybe you were looking for "disgust".

William thinks there are 'justifiable' occasions for rape which tells me that for him women are 'property'. If he is in a relationship, he probably mutters in his head or under his breath every time his "relationship" makes a request for intimacy.

There are no justifications for treating women like property, including rape.

If anybody is reacting to this you might be one of those who treat women like property. Seriously, you need to eradicate the possibility.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:22 am
@Francis,
Francis wrote:

I'm glad that you came to such compassionate sentiments
as it's not this thoughtful behavior that you were displaying one or two years ago..
I did not imply I have been free of guilt in this matter (especially not when provoked),
but it is easier to read the thread, to follow the reasoning of the debate,
without the personal insults.

Does anyone believe that the ad hominen acrimony has value ?





David
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2010 09:26 am
@OmSigDAVID,
David wrote:
Does anyone believe that the ad hominen acrimony has value ?


Someone has already replied:

Dasein wrote:
Seriously, you need to eradicate the possibility.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/31/2025 at 06:41:45