Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

Quote:

A call to your local D.A.'s office could probably clarify the "drunk" question for you, the same way that calling the IRS can clarify a question about a tax deduction.

are you going to try to sell me a bridge next? That is an excellent way to end up on a watch list. Finding out what is a felony violation that will likely follow me for the rest of my life certainly should be easier then figuring out the tax code. The penalty for tax violation is at most a few extra bucks, it is not a prison term and a sex offender registration...Not. The. Same. Thing.

Quote:

I have never been against men. I am against rape--rape of people of either gender.

Then where are your posts against men being raped ?

If your wife was to read all your posts would she consent and agree with you?

You have a very unrealistic and warped view of life. You must have missed out on a lot over the years to have come to the conclusions that you do.

Physical evidence is a form of corroboration.
If you want to read the law literally, there doesnt need to be physical evidence of a rape either.

As I have said, not doing sex until and unless both parties agree on everything, in advance, is highly unrealistic.

Only idiots would base everything on sight alone.

If your wife was to read all your posts would she consent and agree with you?

Can you read the title of the thread? Thought not.

You have a very unrealistic and warped view of life. You must have missed out on a lot over the years to have come to the conclusions that you do.

The behaviors included under the crime of rape in the state of Washington, where you live, have not changed at all.

Due to the dedicated efforts of our advocates across the state of Washington, victims of sexual
violence have an even stronger tool to increase their safety through orders of protection and
victims of sexual violence cannot be forced to submit to a polygraph test.

Washington law is very inferior by your view

There have been changes here however towards the rape feminist agenda...

.Washington law is very inferior by your view, as even 3rd degree rape still requires the victim to vocally demonstrate lack of consent

By 1989, the Washington State Supreme Court openly shifted the burden of proving consent to the defendant when it argued that the removal of legislative language requiring non-consent for rape “evidences legislative intent to shift the burden of proof on the issue to the defense” and approved this blatantly unconstitutional presumption of guilt. The result, write Weiss and Young, was not “to jail more violent rapists — lack of consent is easy enough for the state to prove in those cases — but to make it easier to send someone to jail for failing to get an explicit nod of consent from an apparently willing partner before engaging in sex.”

(1) "Sexual intercourse" (a) has its ordinary meaning and occurs upon any penetration, however slight, and

(b) Also means any penetration of the vagina or anus however slight, by an object, when committed on one person by another, whether such persons are of the same or opposite sex, except when such penetration is accomplished for medically recognized treatment or diagnostic purposes, and

(c) Also means any act of sexual contact between persons involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another whether such persons are of the same or opposite sex.

(2) "Sexual contact" means any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person done for the purpose of gratifying sexual desire of either party or a third party.

(3) "Married" means one who is legally married to another, but does not include a person who is living separate and apart from his or her spouse and who has filed in an appropriate court for legal separation or for dissolution of his or her marriage.

(4) "Mental incapacity" is that condition existing at the time of the offense which prevents a person from understanding the nature or consequences of the act of sexual intercourse whether that condition is produced by illness, defect, the influence of a substance or from some other cause.

(5) "Physically helpless" means a person who is unconscious or for any other reason is physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act.

(6) "Forcible compulsion" means physical force which overcomes resistance, or a threat, express or implied, that places a person in fear of death or physical injury to herself or himself or another person, or in fear that she or he or another person will be kidnapped.

(7) "Consent" means that at the time of the act of sexual intercourse or sexual contact there are actual words or conduct indicating freely given agreement to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact.

(8) "Significant relationship" means a situation in which the perpetrator is:

(a) A person who undertakes the responsibility, professionally or voluntarily, to provide education, health, welfare, or organized recreational activities principally for minors;

(b) A person who in the course of his or her employment supervises minors; or

(c) A person who provides welfare, health or residential assistance, personal care, or organized recreational activities to frail elders or vulnerable adults, including a provider, employee, temporary employee, volunteer, or independent contractor who supplies services to long-term care facilities licensed or required to be licensed under chapter 18.20, 18.51, 72.36, or 70.128 RCW, and home health, hospice, or home care agencies licensed or required to be licensed under chapter 70.127 RCW, but not including a consensual sexual partner.

(9) "Abuse of a supervisory position" means:

(a) To use a direct or indirect threat or promise to exercise authority to the detriment or benefit of a minor; or

(b) To exploit a significant relationship in order to obtain the consent of a minor.

(10) "Person with a developmental disability," for purposes of RCW 9A.44.050(1)(c) and 9A.44.100(1)(c), means a person with a developmental disability as defined in RCW 71A.10.020.

(11) "Person with supervisory authority," for purposes of RCW 9A.44.050(1) (c) or (e) and 9A.44.100(1) (c) or (e), means any proprietor or employee of any public or private care or treatment facility who directly supervises developmentally disabled, mentally disordered, or chemically dependent persons at the facility.

(12) "Person with a mental disorder" for the purposes of RCW 9A.44.050(1)(e) and 9A.44.100(1)(e) means a person with a "mental disorder" as defined in RCW 71.05.020.

(13) "Person with a chemical dependency" for purposes of RCW 9A.44.050(1)(e) and 9A.44.100(1)(e) means a person who is "chemically dependent" as defined in RCW 70.96A.020(4).

(14) "Health care provider" for purposes of RCW 9A.44.050 and 9A.44.100 means a person who is, holds himself or herself out to be, or provides services as if he or she were: (a) A member of a health care profession under chapter 18.130 RCW; or (b) registered under chapter 18.19 RCW or licensed under chapter 18.225 RCW, regardless of whether the health care provider is licensed, certified, or registered by the state.

(15) "Treatment" for purposes of RCW 9A.44.050 and 9A.44.100 means the active delivery of professional services by a health care provider which the health care provider holds himself or herself out to be qualified to provide.

(16) "Frail elder or vulnerable adult" means a person sixty years of age or older who has the functional, mental, or physical inability to care for himself or herself. "Frail elder or vulnerable adult" also includes a person found incapacitated under chapter 11.88 RCW, a person over eighteen years of age who has a developmental disability under chapter 71A.10 RCW, a person admitted to a long-term care facility that is licensed or required to be licensed under chapter 18.20, 18.51, 72.36, or 70.128 RCW, and a person receiving services from a home health, hospice, or home care agency licensed or required to be licensed under chapter 70.127 RCW.


[2007 c 20 § 3; 2005 c 262 § 1; 2001 c 251 § 28. Prior: 1997 c 392 § 513; 1997 c 112 § 37; 1994 c 271 § 302; 1993 c 477 § 1; 1988 c 146 § 3; 1988 c 145 § 1; 1981 c 123 § 1; 1975 1st ex.s. c 14 § 1. Formerly RCW 9.79.140.]


Notes:
Effective date -- 2007 c 20: See note following RCW 9A.44.050.

Severability -- 2001 c 251: See RCW 18.225.900.


Short title -- Findings -- Construction -- Conflict with federal requirements -- Part headings and captions not law -- 1997 c 392: See notes following RCW 74.39A.009.


Intent -- 1994 c 271: "The legislature hereby reaffirms its desire to protect the children of Washington from sexual abuse and further reaffirms its condemnation of child sexual abuse that takes the form of causing one child to engage in sexual contact with another child for the sexual gratification of the one causing such activities to take place." [1994 c 271 § 301.]


Purpose -- Severability -- 1994 c 271: See notes following RCW 9A.28.020.


Severability -- Effective dates -- 1988 c 146: See notes following RCW 9A.44.050.


Effective date -- 1988 c 145: "This act shall take effect July 1, 1988." [1988 c 145 § 26.]

What victims of any other crime have to submit to a polygraph test?

Rape hasn't changed. It has always been non consensual sexual intercourse.

You and BillRM do nothing but concoct lies about definitions of rape having been changed and expanded. And you come up with hypothetical scare scenarios to suggest that men can be charged with rape for doing all sorts of things that would not be considered rape under your state laws. You are the one with the political agenda, and to further that agenda you lie repeatedly.

"painful horror stories" are simply current news reports

As opposed to your fantasy that rape is something erotic that women might enjoy or secretly long for.

You certainly do seem fascinated with feasting on your own fantasies of men being raped in prison.

You even calculated the number of inmates being raped on a daily basis.

Can't get enough of it, huh?