Women cop blame (again) for sex assault
Nina Funnell
October 7, 2010 - 10:12AM
No men, including footballers, are entitled to sex with drunk women.
Women ask to be raped. Women fabricate rape allegations to assuage guilt. Rape victims are sluts and strays. These are some of the attitudes that have been unearthed this week following a police investigation into sexual assault allegations made by a 20-year-old woman.
The woman alleges she was the victim of a sexual assault involving a number of men, including two Collingwood players. The incident was said to have occurred in South Melbourne on Sunday morning, just hours after Collingwood defeated St Kilda in the grand final rematch.
While the accused must be presumed innocent until proved otherwise, cases such as this highlight problems in broader community attitudes towards sex, consent and women.
Retired AFL star Peter "Spida" Everitt used Twitter to suggest that the woman only made the sexual assault complaint after waking up with a hangover and a guilty conscience. The tweet read, "Yet another alleged girl, making alleged allegations, after she awoke with an alleged hangover and, I take it, an alleged guilty conscience.''
On Channel Seven's Sunrise, he went on to say that players are the real victims, a claim that was reinforced by Channel Nine's Kerri-Anne Kennerley, who expressed sympathy for the players who put themselves ''in harm's way'' by the "strays" they pick up.
And we wonder why some young men have difficulty respecting women.
In another tweet, Everitt wrote: ''Girls!! When will you learn! At 3am when you are blind drunk & you decide to go home with a guy ITS NOT FOR A CUP OF MILO!''
Concerningly, statements like these encourage men to believe they are entitled to have sex with vulnerable women, and women to believe they are not entitled to say ''no'' once drunk or alone with a man. In other words, "girls" who are "blind drunk" are just asking for it.
According to social commentator Melinda Tankard Reist, people are rightly offended by Kennerley and Everitt's statements because they reinforce a wider belief that women are responsible for sexual assault and that it is acceptable to blame the victim. "I think he should apologise for that," says Tankard Reist.
In attempting to clarify his position, Everitt tweeted, "My comments are solely aimed at warning females of the danger of being drunk or under the influence of drugs."
"You can't sit there and try and blame somebody else when you've put yourself in that situation," he said on Sunrise.
Feminist author Emily Maguire fired back with a tweet of her own: "We 'females' have been receiving such warnings our whole lives. Consider directing your advice to the blokes next time."
Unfortunately, many people still put the onus on women to modify their behaviour in order to forward manage the poor behaviour of a small group of men.
Others mistakenly believe that most rapes occur down dark alleys and are committed by strangers in balaclavas.
But fewer than 1 per cent of sexual assaults are committed by complete strangers. The reality is that about 70 per cent are committed by a family member, friend, or school or work colleague.
In the remaining cases, the assault is committed by someone the victim met that night, usually at a bar, club or party. In these cases, alcohol or drugs are often a factor.
But rather than telling women not to drink, we need to be teaching all young people the consent laws. If a person is blind drunk to the point of passing out, then they do not have the capacity to give consent.
This is not just the opinion of feminists. This is the law in all Australian states and territories.
Similarly, if a person consents to sex with one or two or even three people, this does not mean they have consented to having sex with a fourth. If a person consents to one sexual act, they have not consented to all sexual acts. A person can withdraw consent at any time during the sex act (though not after it). Any level of force or coercion legally negates free consent.
Obeying the law is important. But we would be wise to acknowledge that there is an awful lot of behaviour that goes on that may not technically be criminal or illegal but is unethical and degrading. Respect and consideration for others' well-being is key.
Attitudes that shift the onus of responsibility on to victims by blaming them for their dress or behaviour do not only excuse sexual assault. These attitudes also excuse the practise of people not caring for, or actively respecting, their partner's well-being.
Similarly, when individuals such as Everitt imply that women "cry rape" in order to assuage guilt, they not only reinforce the tired notion that it is natural and expected for a woman to feel ''guilt'' over sex, but they also deter other victims from coming forward for fear of not being believed.
The reality is that one in five women in Australia will experience some form of sexual assault. An estimated 85 per cent of them will never report it to police. Under-reporting, not falsified reporting, is the real problem. Clearly there is work ahead.
Nina Funnell is a researcher in the Journalism and Media Research Centre at the University of NSW.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/women-cop-blame-again-for-sex-assault-20101006-167pp.html?from=smh_sb