Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

In fact, up to 42 percents of the total women that the surveys labels as victims do not consider themselves victims with many of them in ongoing relationships with their so call rapists.

The NCWSV study found that, of the college women who experienced unwanted completed penetration by force or the threat of force, only 46.5% of the victims reported that they considered the incident to be a rape (Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 2000). In Koss et al.’s (1988) study, only 27% of the women who reported experiencing an assault that met the legal definition of rape the researchers use considered the incident to be rape. Students are particularly unlikely to label the incident as “rape” when no weapon is used, no sign of physical injury is evident, and alcohol is involved (Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 2000). Victims may not define the event as sexual assault or report the incident because they are embarrassed, are reluctant to consider someone they know as a rapist, or do not understand the legal definition of sexual assault (Pitts & Schwartz, 1993).
http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf

Can a man asked to be raped?

In general, the extensive research on rape myths shows that male and female victims tend to be perceived in accordance with gender stereotypes. For instance, male victims tend to incur blame when they fail to adhere to the male stereotype (ie, being in control, unemotional, and able to fend off attack), whereas female victims incur blame according to specific characteristics (ie, if they were perceived as passive, vulnerable, or sexual)...
These rape myths may even be used by the victims themselves to self-blame for the assault, believing that they were somehow responsible (ie, "as a man I should have fought harder to stop being raped").
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/528821_2

It is not uncommon for a male rape victim to blame himself for the rape, believing that he in some way gave permission to the rapist.
True:
male rape victims suffer a similar fear that female rape victims face -- that people will believe the myth that they may have enjoyed being raped. Some men may believe they were not raped or that they gave consent because they became sexually aroused, had an erection, or ejaculated during the sexual assault. These are normal, involuntary physiological reactions. It does not mean that the victim wanted to be raped or sexually assaulted, or that the survivor enjoyed the traumatic experience. Sexual arousal does not necessarily mean there was consent.
http://www.batteredmen.com/malerape.htm

Struckman-Johnson and Struckman-Johnson report evidence suggesting that male rape myths may be more influential when the rapist is female. Although men and women are raped in similar ways (ie, through violent attacks with weapons, deliberate intoxication, or verbal coercion) and by similar perpetrators (ie, friends, lovers, strangers), it is difficult for society to imagine a woman forcing a man to have sex, or for a man to be unwilling to have sex if the opportunity occurs.
These authors also contend that men who report not having profoundly negative responses to rape may be interpreting the experience in terms of their masculine identity to reduce the impact of the experience. They argue that men are socialized to engage in sexual activity if the opportunity exists; as a result, sexual coercion or intimidation by women may be considered a sexual experience (albeit a negative one) rather than sexual assault or rape. However, it should be noted that although some perpetrators of male rape are female, the vast majority of both male and female rapes by strangers are committed by a male perpetrator.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/528821_2

if you consider that rape is unwanted sexual contact, or sexual contact without consent.

My main concern, now, is that there will be some girl find this thread and miss out on a lot of good information due to her growing tired of reading the trashy stuff and lies thrown about by these misfits. You may think that you need to go back and forth with them, but you have already proven over and over that they lack credibility. I think when they post something that is non-factual and has not already been addressed, that yes, it would then be good to counteract via a reply. Let's face it though, most everything they are saying is the same ole' - same ole'.

Nothing he posts is actually worth reading, and that is true of Hawkeye as well. We have already heard it all. They don't merit our emotional reactions, or our responses, or our attention, and, when we give it to them, we are helping to downgrade this thread.

which is that you are both dishonest and wrong.

Hawkeye what I still find amazing is that a major department of the US government is willing to put out such junk science over this matter

Quote:

model, someone like Intrepid

I do not think so as I would like great grandkids someday.

A far as I am aware there is currently there is no real solid legal standard for the degree of impairment in a large percents of the states and it is whatever a DA can sell a jury on in those areas

Firefily that picture of you before your computer is just how I had picture you in my mind eye.

Quote:

up with a video of Hawkeye and Bill!

Lord I wish I was that young....................

Do u propose that Internet anonymity be ended ?

state to be clear to mean about what the legal standard for rape is is unfair to men.