@Arella Mae,
Arella Mae wrote:
I just thought of something Brooke. These young guys that take these pills-how do you think a judge would view them claiming they were raped by the woman because they were too intoxicated to consent? I'm thinking a judge is going to look mighty hard (no pun intended) at the fact he took those pills and what those pills were for-which they were obviously taken to have sex! I'd say that would pretty much negate their claim of rape. I don't know about in a court of law but it'd be an interesting fact to find out.
What do you think?
They would think that it was just another guy lying about rape, like most rapists do!! Lie - lie - lie - lie - LIE!
I was reading an article the other day about a guy that screamed rape against his female partner. He told the police that she used a date rape drug and molested him. After they had sex, the man made sure that the female understood that he "loved" his wife and would never leave her. The female got pissed because he was treating her like a prostitute after he got in her pants. He even threw money on the table and told her to buy something for her kids.
Well, that did it! She then told him that she was going to tell his wife about the affair. That's when the guy ran to the police and said she raped him. Of course she got treated badly by the police and was put through some pretty intense questioning and testing, as any rapist should be. Luckily for her, the police got the truth out of him and he admitted it was consensual.
I guess rapists don't always lie about the fact that they indeed DID rape someone. Men can also lie and say they were raped when no rape occurred. No matter what gender brings false charges - it is still wrong. It is equally, if not more so, wrong for rapists to lie about their crime and walk free, as many do and go on to rape again and again and again.