A Question To American citizens Only (from a Muslim u would call a moderate)

America must submit to Hannitization.

Ann's hot, admit it.

Man, Ann is stone-cold gorgeous. I'd love to be alone on a life-boat with her, way out at sea.

Maybe bug spray would help.

Back on topic, Muslims have never been in the news in America until 9/11 brought them worldwide attention. Since then, like all attention whores, they now crave and exploit it. We are the saps, running around fearful while they are laughing in their tents and caves. Someone said it here, maybe it was 92B, that they are no better or more organized than any band of thieves and thugs.

Aaron, Terrorist Islam is a tremendous threat. I believe GW is doing everything practical in combatting it.

i would be greatly obliged if you would explain how is or was (news attention) to muslims since 911 useful , laughing in their tents and caves!! if u r talking about afghanistan its been bombed and emptied, if u r talking in general terms about the islamic world then once in a while tune in to Dubai tv.

i sure do hope ur not talking about IRAQ here , bush does not give a damn about the threat of exremist muslims on USA all he cares for is how to make himself richer throught it(the threat) .

PW,
Just like there are extremists and radicals in Islam, we have extremist and radicals here, too. With them there is no room for negotiation or understanding.
All they understand is aggression and revenge for some wrong (imagined or real). Forgive them, because, honestly, they know not what they do.
Just as it is wrong to blanket indict anyone or group, likewise, it is wrong to paint any one group with a broad brush, without research or at the very least, an "open mind".

From day one of even the suggesting of war with Iraq, I thought "profiteering".
And when Haliburton received the no-bid contracts for reconstruction, my suspicions were confirmed. Almost any jury would find the defendents guilty because of plausibility. And Cheney should have gotten rid of any financial boons from the company for appearances and conflict of interest' sake....but that was the plan, all the long...."profiteering". Obvious.

Almost any jury would find the defendents guilty because of plausibility.

And Cheney should have gotten rid of any financial boons from the company for appearances and conflict of interest' sake....

I didn't know you could be convicted for plausability. Guilty for what?Why? Was there something illegal about it?

The thing is there isn't the element of reasonable doubt...there is no doubt...Haliburton got the contract, and they didn't even have to bid for it.

Cheney was once a higher up at Haliburton, and now receiving a pension or stock options....something...and lo, and behold, he winds up VP, and the contract is awarded, post 9/11...the conflict of interest is glaringly apparent...it suggests impropriety and special treatment.

So yes, there is a distinct possibility that the awarding of the contract, to the exclusion of all others, was, in fact, "illegal".

You're always screaming for proof....the proof is out there..but if you don't want to see it, you won't....

the truth doesn't need for you to believe it, to be the truth.

The close -minded, the unenlightened, and intellectually -challenged will never see, "the truth'....

and I, personally, understand...if you were to admit "the truth", your little world would come tumbling down around your ears, and the egg, already on your face, would be revealed to the world, and if you hadn't "cracked", you, then, " most assuredly", would.

I really wish you'd stop responding to my posts...

because I really hate responding to your nonsensical ramblings.

I understand that, but what about it is convictable of a crime, what crime? No bid contracts are not illegal.And? Is any of this illegal? No. Suggesting does not imply guilt of any impropriety. You need proof for that.Where is it illegal? Show me a case number or applicable law? There is none?
So you want to accuse but not provide any proof, you won't get far in a real court. What you have is hearsay, and it is not applicable in a court of law, they will throw you out as an unsubstanciated claim.No but you should have something other then your words to prove your case, if not to me in a court of law. Here we go again. You just don't learn do you.Keep dreaming bud, The only truth i'll admit to is you are a racist.Like Pino said, wish in one hand and **** in the other, see which fills up first.Well, as long as you keep posting your nonsense guess what i'm gonna do?

Better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt

Never doubt, i will open my mouth, regardless of what you think.

Illusions of grandeur...You're not "the wind".
I was born in Houston, Texas....you figure it out.