War in Afghanistan

Financial burdens. Mate, I don't give a fat rats about the burden of imigrants to your shores nor the finances of the Mother country. If you want to believe you are fighting terror then be my guest. The truth is, you are a colonialist force no matter how you wage it, until you offer the solution that is innevitable. That is unlikely because you do not have one and what it is would not be good buisness.

I can agree that which you say, is the reason we are there but I cannot agree with it, when we do not admit we have a part to play in its reason. I am not trying to play you, your beliefs or your well wishes down, but I must stand by saying that we are a great part and reason for this behaviour, due to our own fanaticisms, extremists, and greed. Not to mention, how inconsiderately we believe that relief is simply disarming one over the other.

i live in india now but i am an american citizen who disagrees with its foreign policy. i was against the invasion of afghanistan from the beginning, against intervention with the government of saddam hussein and now looking back i can say terrorism has increased dramatically since those policies were put in place. i am aware of a lot of deaths of civilians and the destruction of the infrastructure and quality of life of the remaining citizens of both countries.

You continue to play a game on a board we loaded. Our historical tales dictate the way in which you percieve ownership. In one hundred years the King Arthur movie will be considered the facts, as long as we continue to percieve that history is what we have written.

Islam did not arm those terrorists, gun manufactureres did. Radicalism does not predict violence but social disfunction feeds it. You offer peace to the innocent by way of force and you perpetuate the cycle of violence. You have no solution but sacrifice.

Stop and listen to yourself at least, Spain who cares about Spain. Did Spain care in the Americas, did they care in the Philipines, did they care anywhere. Provided they fed the coffers of their own greed, the lord was blessing them. So I care not for the plight of Spain. Prey tell me who is Spain. Is it the Romans, the Vandals, some other hoarde, was it someone before the Romans, were they of middle Eastern stock were they African and hey, how could anyone one other than whites be the lords of a part of Europe. Europe is for Europeans and the rest of the world is European for the taking.

Come off the horse that carries you too, the Palestine, in search of your Jerusalem. For which you shall conquer all to ingratiate thyself with Jesus. I will gladly nail the bastard to the cross, if it teaches you all of your errant ways.

I do not think you can read at all Kennethamy if that is the impression you get from my post. The conquest of Spain, is a rue they drew for themselves over 700 years ago. Outcasting all but white Europeans, and Christians to boot. My point is that the peninsula was never anybodies that came from roman times on. It was anybodies or everyones. Before Roman times who were its inhabitants. This west mentallity is the curse you bring upon yourself. It is not what I perpetuate. I have accepted that I am in the wrong where I live. My say is mute to the desires of those more natural. I believe that my ancestry has blood on its hands and I will stand in that position.

Xris this better dead than red mentality is outdated. I am not an Islamic sympathiser. I do not believe for one moment that they are any more innocent than our western civilisations, but you want to claim that, them and their religion and their desire to rule the world is what brings the peace you fought so hard to create for yourself at the expense of others undone. Who ruled Indo-China following world war II. Who was ousted from India, Malay, China, Singapore, countless other nations in Africa, and Asia, at a struggle at a cost. We finished fighting a war to rid the world of dictatorship and oppression and there we were gunning for our own intrests once again.

Was it the attrocities that forced a closure to China trade or was it the simple desire to punish them for kicking out the wealth interest in the nation. Why did America ban trade with Vietnam, following that war. They were the righteous government. Of the people for the people, just not the ones who could strike the best bargain. Don't talk to me like you deserve a peace that little rest of the world has. With no thanks to any of us fanatical Christians, Muslims, Consumerists, or whatever greed, inflicted hysteria, that controls us, has done.

I would sell chainsaws to Brazilians at a real cheap price, in fact i would give them away, including the fuel, so that we realised that poverty, is deforesting the environment, more than big buisness. They need food and we restrict them from farming. Indonesia need food and we have international watewrs in Australia that prevent themn from fishing , but a select one or two big buisnessmen, run the entire Torres Straight fishing industry. OH well I get a wage, why should I care.

Listen to yourself and think like a human rather than some being that believes it has all the rights.

Is 1946 history, is 1970, if so then so is yesterday. How ignorant you are. By the way, you brought up the history lesson. I just ran my own tale of it. I certainly don't call post WWII, history. I call it yesterday.

I have tried to tell you that killing all things that move in Afghanistan is not the solution. I have at least tried a suggestion, I have said that we are involved, even agreed that that includes Australia. All you have thought about is killing the enemy, the loss of those there killing and how ordinary Afghani have some kind of an opinion of certain things. You want to call me out.

Where would we be without chess.