@electronicmail,
Slaves used to be treated very violently till the ban on slavery ships by Britain started to have more and more of an effect . Then it was cheaper to breed them locally.....as their value increased, they were treated better, though still in a manner that most of us would find shocking . The Agricultural Revolution would have ended slavery in the fields...the unions following the Industrial Revolution ended slavery in the factories.....all of this was generated by money .
Slavery was a means to an end....to say the means was the end is pathetically stupid (reading this Farmerman and Snood?) .
There are no end to the people who want to glorify war...apparently it is taught in USA schools that the North fought the South to free the slaves....what lovely people ! Apparently it was the only war in history that was fought for lovely reasons, not money and power . A war where they killed more white men then almost all their other wars in their history put together . A war where they had the policy of destroying the South so it could never secede again....it seems they forgot about the real issue when they were fighting it....or these apologist clowns are wrong .
Snood is black and is stuck in the "poor pitiful me" syndrome . Famerman is white and stuck in the "we may have done it but at least we fixed it" syndrome . Two different ways of coming up with the same wrong reason for a war . Problem is, if we dont learn from war we are doomed to repeat it .
Perhaps the Gulf wars were fought to free the arabs...perhaps WWII was fought to save the Jews...are there any other examples of wars (in this case a particularly bloody and destructive war) fought out of love for another people ? Any ?