5
   

SEC watching porn instead of financial industry!!

 
 
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 07:13 pm
Quote:
SEC watching porn instead of financial industry
Wonder why they missed the financial crisis? Or Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme? A government report obtained by ABC News reveals that SEC employees were focused on something else: porn.

By Husna Haq, /Correspondent / April 23, 2010

Just when it was beginning to repair its reputation with its high-profile case against Goldman Sachs, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) suffers another major blow: Senior staffers there were surfing Internet pornography " as much as eight hours per day, in one case " when they were supposed to be policing the financial industry.

Perhaps this helps explain why the SEC didn't see the financial collapse coming. Or did nothing to stop Lehman Bros.’ questionable accounting tactics. Or Bernie Madoff’s dubious “investing” strategy."

For the remainder of the aneurysm inducing article....
http://www.csmonitor.com/Money/2010/0423/SEC-watching-porn-instead-of-financial-industry
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 5 • Views: 2,594 • Replies: 9

 
Rockhead
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 07:21 pm
what's the difference between Bernie Madoff and a big bald beaver?


Bernie is no fun to watch at work...


(miss letty, don't google that...) Shocked
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 07:24 pm
Why would you do your job? Your going to get paid anyway. In fact your job is to do nothing. If you don't do your job... you don't lose anything, some asshole you don't know losses.

And the whole system is a joke it just hasn't reached the idiots at the bottom yet
and even if it did they won't do anything. It's perfect... like a pyramid. Just make sure your as close to the top as possible and those beneath you will support you.

0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 09:25 pm
@tsarstepan,
Better living through bigger government.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 09:33 pm
Isn't it their job to check if people are getting screwed ?
Amigo
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 09:54 pm
@dadpad,
dadpad wrote:

Isn't it their job to check if people are getting screwed ?

Only if the people getting screwed pay more then the people doing the screwing. Once the people doing the screwing pay them more money then the people getting screwed, The people getting screwed actually think they are safe because they are paying somebody to protect them. Except that sombody really works for somebody else.

Taxation Without Representation.

Irishk
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 10:28 pm
@dadpad,
dadpad wrote:
Isn't it their job to check if people are getting screwed ?


Laughing
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 11:22 pm
Jesus wept.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Apr, 2010 11:29 pm
@Amigo,
Amigo wrote:

dadpad wrote:

Isn't it their job to check if people are getting screwed ?

Only if the people getting screwed pay more then the people doing the screwing. Once the people doing the screwing pay them more money then the people getting screwed, The people getting screwed actually think they are safe because they are paying somebody to protect them. Except that sombody really works for somebody else.

Taxation Without Representation.




Where is there taxation without representation?

It is far more the case that there is representation without taxation.
Amigo
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 24 Apr, 2010 12:32 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Amigo wrote:

dadpad wrote:

Isn't it their job to check if people are getting screwed ?

Only if the people getting screwed pay more then the people doing the screwing. Once the people doing the screwing pay them more money then the people getting screwed, The people getting screwed actually think they are safe because they are paying somebody to protect them. Except that sombody really works for somebody else.

Taxation Without Representation.




Where is there taxation without representation?

It is far more the case that there is representation without taxation.
Are you talking about welfare? Do you want to put the corporate welfare stats against the social welfare stats.

Ok.

Corperate bail out (welfare) = 12 Trillion

http://money.cnn.com/news/storysupplement/economy/bailouttracker/



Social welfare is SOCIALIZED. But the 12 Trillion that went to the banks is PROFIT.

BOTH THE LOSSES AND PROFITS ARE SOCIALIZED BY THE TAX PAYER. THE BANK NEVER PAYS THE LOSSES IT ALWAYS GETS THE PROFITS. "To big to fail" Laughing

"But those people that are being represented without being taxed, they are the problem"

Worship John Galt and let your kids be his slave and own nothing. NOTHING!

Your a fucken brain weak idiot. Your kind will go down slowly as a mass of followers of stupidity and social dawinism (a conservative ideal) will do it's job.

Thank god


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » SEC watching porn instead of financial industry!!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/26/2024 at 06:45:09