@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Bollocks, far right demagogues like Bush who want to start a 'crusade' and holy war are the real problem.
Well, Bush is retired so he won't be starting any Holy Wars anytime soon, but who are his successors about which we all need worry?
I do have to laugh though the way you fall right into step with the propaganda, even when it is clearly shite.
The only people who seriously accused Bush of starting the war in Iraq for religious reasons were a few half-crazed imams and Baghdad Bob.
And to think that hidden beneath all of the nonsense about Islamist designs to establish The New Caliphate, the truth has been lying there; waiting to be revealed by a lowly comic book aficionado living somewhere in the United Kingdom:
A group of far-right Christian princes in the West, led by First Among Pilgrims George W. Bush of the US, began a crusade to restore the oil fields of the Middle East to Western control, and to wage Holy War against Muhammadans across the globe.
I was about to write that even you would not contend that Bush believed he was the vanguard of a modern Holy War, but then I recalled your citing Yasser Arafat as a boyhood hero and just recently asserting that Abdel Baset al-Megrahi was innocent of the charges that he engineered the Lockerbie disaster.
The Pope has to be a
founding father, not to mention major bankroller. I'm sure Rowan Williams wants no part of the New Crusade, nor do I suspect does Rick Warren either, (Obama would never have picked him for the Inaugural Invocation if he was one of
those kinds of nutty xtians). You know Franklin Graham's all over it and there's no question but that Howard and Roberta Ahmanson are involved with the financial side (No doubt the Chalcedon Foundation is somehow mixed up in it as well.)
But do you think the Patriarch is in on it too?