@Olivier5,
Ok fair enough that you admit you don't understand and at least now you're being honest and we can move on.
Do you understand that to
some modern day Atheists the term Atheist only means to them that they are without belief and entails nothing else and nothing more?
To them Atheism doesn't determine any other of their life views. It comes without dogma and tenets.
Second, Gnostic and agnostic means to them in and of itself what ones know or doesn't know or perceived as can't know. It is a question of knowledge not of belief.
That was the sole premise of my posting.
But you guys want to make me draw some conclusion from this, as if I must take some positions. Why must I take any position?
but for dialogue sake I will see where this leads.
But be fore warn no matter what position one takes it is up for debate because we are talking about religion.
Third how can you claim I never answered the question when you now admit you don't understand my post?
Let see my my reasoning go for better or worse.
I guess one could be an Atheist agnostic. This would mean I am without a belief of god, admittedly a non-believer who doesn't know whether god(s) exit or not. I'm using the modern day definition that some atheist identify with.
If I say I am a Gnostic Atheist I am saying that I am without belief of a god(s) and I know there's know god.
I'm pretty sure you can figure out the combinations of theist position from here.
If knowing my position is helpful to you, and I do see how it is, I guess my position would be one of being an Agnostic Atheist.
Does this answer your question?
