@chai2,
Quote:I know. He is a nasty person.
He's not as nasty as Setanta, and a few others on here, who are telling lies all the time in every post they make. He, and them, promote atheism not on the advantages of atheism in the sexual behavior field, which they dare not do, and I am willing to if required, but on the basis of attacking a morality, which does not affect them if they so choose, and which we will have to live with if they succeed in their mission.
I am an atheist.
Setanta & Co are holding atheism back because they associate it with stupidity and the cowardly and sneaky trick of ignoring my posts and the challenges they offer. They are 100% negative. What we should not have rather than what we should have. Which is full-blown eugenics, euthanasia, sexual promiscuity, (the whole gamut) , and conditioning for scientific materialism, which is amoral, none of which they will defend and which are the logical outcome of their promotions and are, indeed, half way to fulfillment right now.
What sort of an argument is it, chai, in relation to a cultural upheaval, that I am a nasty person? Or that you are sometimes a good person. "Good" can only be defined functionally by those with power.
Asserting that I am a nasty person is merely a cheap trick to evade the relevant questions: aka continuous lies. It's a free country so you can buy into it if you want. Your politicians don't and neither do ours.