spendius
 
  1  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 03:55 pm
@Frank Apisa,
They shouldn't need any help. They only do so because the older bunch have grabbed the best fruits and are holding onto them. It was everso. If sticking a dollar in a box makes the fuckers feel good about themselves then so it goes.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 03:57 pm
Frank Apisa said: "I knew you would not give any [money] to me....also that the guy you mentioned in your original post would never have seen any either"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You "know" quite a lot for somebody who admits they're often wrong mate..Wink

"I often am wrong...and I have no problem with acknowledging when I am"- Frank Apisa 17 Nov 2013 in 'The Half-Life of Facts' thread
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 04:11 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:

Frank Apisa said: "I knew you would not give any [money] to me....also that the guy you mentioned in your original post would never have seen any either"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You "know" quite a lot for somebody who admits they're often wrong mate..Wink

"I often am wrong...and I have no problem with acknowledging when I am"- Frank Apisa 17 Nov 2013 in 'The Half-Life of Facts' thread


Ya got me there! Touche'.

My wording was miserable. Thanks for calling it to my attention.
Setanta
 
  3  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 07:05 pm
To get back to the thread topic (hint: it's not about Romeo's loony world view)

I saw this at facebook, it's a knee-slapper. Look carefully at the price tag.

https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/safe_image.php?d=AQBhswDyDOzjUg9U&w=398&h=208&url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.huffpost.com%2Fgen%2F1471604%2Fthumbs%2Fo-BIBLE-facebook.jpg&cfs=1&upscale
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 07:12 pm
@Setanta,
Ooh goody i lurv pictures..Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/BibTimC_zpsaaa26ca0.gif
hingehead
 
  2  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 08:09 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
No you don't. You love not thinking.

http://www.caveofthemounds.com/images/geotimeline.jpg
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Wed 20 Nov, 2013 08:20 pm
@Frank Apisa,
At least you would be willing to admit.
Romeo is "never wrong"
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 08:58 am
Quote:
Neologist said: @Frank Apisa,
At least you would be willing to admit.
Romeo is "never wrong"

As I'm a debating superstar let me give you the First Three Rules of Debating-
1- NEVER BE WRONG! Stick to FACTS backed up by links and quotes and nobody will be able to shoot you down. They may try, but will only make themselves look stupid..Smile

2-If occasionally you want to field your own speculations and opinions, make it clear that you're not claiming they're facts..Smile

3- Never start a fight with a debating superstar..Wink

"Commander, our first shot missed and now Fabulini is turning onto an attack vector with fully-charged phaser banks!"

"EVASIVE MANOEUVRE NUMBER ONE!!! Quickly or we shall not see the stars of home again!"

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/sub4/STBalofTerror.jpg

spendius
 
  0  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 10:48 am
@neologist,
Quote:
At least you would be willing to admit.
Romeo is "never wrong"


How can he be when he resorts to claiming he doesn't understand an argument when he is shown to be wrong and ignores pointers which will show him that he is.

He is wrong in that he believes that an international debate forum is pitched at the level he has become accustomed to and from which he has derived his mistaken self-confidence.

It is highly likely that his attacks on the Catholic Church are caused by him disagreeing with its teachings on sexual morality in early manhood when a chaste girl was having her last line of defence undermined for reasons too obvious for a wordly audience to need an explanation of. And his brilliant insights as a callow youth have since spun somewhat out of control. To have "scored" implied a defence existed. It still does to the extent of "scoring" when a defence does not exist as one often does not on the lawn in the back garden of a suburban villa. The term has become washed out now the last line of defence--"but its a sin Sir" --is in desuetude. It used to carry chutzpa when I was young. When it was believed I mean.

Like when Tony Curtis paid a visit to his hometown and passing an old mate from school he pulled over, wound the window down, and shouted--"Hey--I fucked Olivia de Havilland." And drove off.

The same literary thrust, so to speak, exists in expressions such as "did you get it on", "did you make out" and "did you get the leg over". Even "****" contains it. "Did you get home in time to catch the late night news?" is a less virile expression.

The question is that the situation is dynamic, as are all things, and imo, and I stress it is an opinion, dogging is only the start of a slippery slope into ruination when the undermining of the Church's teachings on sexual morality is complete, done and dusted, dismantled, and only remembered within the hallowed halls of academic history as a quaint old-fashioned custom which prevented the awarding of Honours Degrees and Peeaitchdees to the female students. Male students graduating in rowing, football, golf and such like under the guidance of professors who were foolish enough to think that keeping fit has anything going for it.

Which doesn't much sound like ruination I know. But it is what necessarily accompanies such a temptation when it is as gradual and as pleasant as just having one more drink is.

"Care for the future" is what is written all over Raphael's Sistine Madonna. That's the sum of the Faustian culture and we see on the News every day the evidence that it is in abeyance.





What do you think neo?
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 11:05 am
Quote:
Spendius huffed:- he [RF} resorts to claiming he doesn't understand an argument...
..his [RF} attacks on the Catholic Church

1- What "argument"? I never argue, I simply state facts, so if anybody wants to make himself look stupid by arguing with facts, that's his business..Smile

2- Catholics worship Jesus's mum, so in my book that makes them satanic crackpots of the first magnitude!
I mean, does anybody worship Buddha's mum, or Mohammeds mum? Nah..Smile
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Romeo Fabulini: when the fur is flying, it's certainly not his!
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/sub4/flying-cat-fight.jpg
spendius
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 11:39 am
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
I mean, does anybody worship Buddha's mum, or Mohammeds mum? Nah.


We had to show them how to open a tin can.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  0  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 01:18 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
I wrote:
At least you would be willing to admit.
Romeo is "never wrong"
How can he be when he resorts to claiming he doesn't understand an argument when he is shown to be wrong and ignores pointers. ... ?
Romeo has his own brand of dodge ball that may even include blaming Hollywood for their rendition of a Bible account he declined to read. The book of Revelation? Too symbolic! Dont try to instruct him in that.

As far as the Catholic stand on sexual morality is concerned, you may be right, as he specializes in questionable innuendo. But, to be fair, Roman Catholicism has uncountable failings, not the least of which is their inattention to John 13:35.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 01:24 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:
As I'm a debating superstar let me give you the First Three Rules of Debating-
1- NEVER BE WRONG! Stick to FACTS backed up by links and quotes and nobody will be able to shoot you down. They may try, but will only make themselves look stupid..Smile

2-If occasionally you want to field your own speculations and opinions, make it clear that you're not claiming they're facts..Smile

3- Never start a fight with a debating superstar..Wink
Waiting for your demonstrations. Laughing
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 03:01 pm
@spendius,
Shortly after my post 809 (above) I happened to catch a scene in one of our very popular soaps which was broadcast at about 7.10 pm. It was a scene in which a rather choice and well upholstered lady of about 40, blond etc. was attempting to persuade a broken down old grey haired fart to go to bed with her for one hour. She offered him a grand. He whipped a wad of notes out of his pocket and waved it at her. She offered him two grand. He walked away disgusted looking (he's only acting) and as he neared the door she upped it to three grand. He stopped and he acted being undecided. Cut. I never saw the outcome but I don't suppose they would show it anyway.

Maybe I ought to revise my position.
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 03:57 pm
@spendius,
BTW--the scene is set in a Yorkshire village in the Dales.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 05:48 pm
@neologist,
Still looking for trouble mate? You came to the right place..Smile
I've been reading your biography post and unearthed this interesting quote about the time you were a green young man wondering whether to join the JW's-
"What about these foolish things like no blood transfusion, not saluting the flag, etc.? How could these people possibly have the truth? I adopted the attitude that I would hang around until I figured it all out one way or the other. It took many months"

Therefore at first you did good by recognising that their doctrines were shite, but then, over "many months" of "hanging around" with them they gradually sapped your will and you slipped into their clutches, fulfilling this prophecy-
"Bad company corrupts good character" (1 Cor 15:33)
"If you hang around with losers, you become a loser"- Donald Trump


And you call yourself an arm-wrestler? Huh, the JW's beat you hands down!
No offence but what made you eventually decide to join them against your better judgement, did a JW floozy flutter her eyelashes at you or what?..Wink
The JW's wouldn't be able to take Jesus, no way hozay!
Jesus said "Satan has no hold on me" (John 14:30)

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/jesus_vs_satan.gif

PS- but credit where it's due, at least you had the guts to admit you're a JW, unlike that chickenshit wimp Spendius whose profile is as blank as an atheists bible..Smile
neologist
 
  1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 06:02 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Paul didn't believe at first, either.
Read John 13:35
No other religion even comes close.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 06:04 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
My profile Romeo says things you dare not say.

You're a poseur. And not very good at it too. Your profile says nothing.

And I answer points put to me which you have singularly failed to do.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 06:35 pm
Quote:
Spendius pouted: My profile Romeo says things you dare not say.

What celestial orb do you inhabit mate?
Your profile says you're a "microbe", so what are you, an escapee from a germ warfare lab or did you fly in on a meteor?
My own profile is a masterpiece-
"The names Mick, age 60+, I've got a normal healthy interest in Christianity, philosophy, metaphysics, ancient scripture etc.
Live in Plymouth, England, retired"


and i've also posted pictures of me and my house etc.
By contrast you seem to prefer hiding in the dark like a flu germ in a culture dish..Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/nite-eyesB.gif~original

PS- you seem to be talking a lot about the Yorkshire Dales and i pity you living up there, they're the most boring barren grey places on earth and the TV companies must be barmy to film Emmerdale, Heartbeat, Summer Wine and the James Herriot shows up there!
But full credit to the northerners, they may be thick but at least they're mostly not gay like nearly everybody southeast of the Watford gap
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Thu 21 Nov, 2013 06:50 pm
Quote:
Neologist said: Paul didn't believe at first, either.
Read John 13:35. No other religion even comes close

John 13:34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

But how can letting your kids die without a transfusion be "loving"?
Like all cults, the JW's are too rigid and strait-laced in their interpretation of the Bible, seizing on just a few verses to build their beliefs on, instead of looking at the wider context.
"I can say truly that JWs are most certainly not perfect" - Neologist quote Aug 18 2006 in "for Neologist and anyone else assocd with Watchtower" thread


 

Related Topics

The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism
  3. » Page 379
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/11/2025 at 02:35:30