@Frank Apisa,
Quote: You cannot rule out the possibility of intelligent design if you do not rule out the possibility of GOD.
You really must go and find someone who gives a **** about the validity of that statement. Ive alredy ruled out the possibility of ID as anything but a theistic invention (gods are therefore a necessary ingredient)
Quote:
How can you do that?
Do you know there is no possibility of a GOD?
If not...you cannot know there is no possibility of intelligent design
Easy, we look at the RGUMENTS of a technical nature that the IDers are powing (Remember, its their belief and they hve the responsibility to defend it)
They've already accepted "evolution" but as an intelligently directed sourcecode. (That's wht I call Cretionism and I keep asking for the evidence )
Irreducible Complexity hqs been debunked quite easily and I assume the IDers are out looking for other biochemical events to back their claims of Irreducible complexity(SO far no good)
Looking at the falsifiability, I cn use a number of natural sciences to falsify and test evolution > However, ID cannot.
If you cannot(by ignorance or whatever) advance any better argument beyond your favorite bumper stickers, Id suggest you find another thread NOT NAMED atheism.
Do you realize what evidence comprises? and how we base our understandings on it ?
eg
If the blood clotting cascade of protein and enzymes in chordates is presented as 26 discrete and separate enzymatic reactions (AND THEREFORE) Is presented as proof positive of IDs main concept of Irreducible complexity, and then Scientists (working on some totally different project) present a cascade of 25 of these same enzymes and proteins in the next lower Superclass of animals, that seemed to take lots of wind out of the Irreducible... balloon.
No more on your bumper sticker. find someone who gives a **** about "If there weren't Easter Bunniess, there wouldn't be any unicorns"