@Krumple,
Quote:I love this. He is so bent that he can't seem to let it go. He wants to pretend that he is done with it but it is obvious that he can't get over me. Just goes to show that has nothing to do with what I talk about or the content of what is said. It has everything to do with not liking someone because they bring up a position that is not popular.
I am not part of his tribe so he wants to exterminate me from it. He doesn't want anyone else to accept me into their tribes either but can't accept the fact that everyone hasn't abandoned me. He doesn't seem to realize it doesn't matter who decides to take such a reaction. Another method of group mentality to impose his will onto others which is the very core to what I am discussing.
That's all empty drivel Krumpie.
It is my will that the skimpy breech cloths on female athletes should be no longer mandatory. What is your position and why?
An interesting side note on the Olympic Games---I didn't see it myself but two friends of mine did and independently of each other.
When the gold medallists in the ladies' double something or other crossed the line one of them fell back, either exhausted or in a delirium of joy, and her skimpy breech cloth became unaligned just as the camera had her in close up. A full beaver was displayed.
Now one of the things it is impossible not to notice is that highlights of the proceedings always feechewer interesting or dramatic events from the day, or the week. Often many times if they are especially interesting or dramatic. A racing car piling into the cushions for example. Or a crash on one bend in a 200 km cycle race involving the stragglers.
So, with that in mind, I took the trouble to watch as many highlight feechewers as I could to see the very interesting and dramatic accident in the ladies' rowing.
Nothing doing. What is the atheist position on such censorship. I'm all in favour of it being shown many times and in slo-mo. But I'm a real atheist. I'm not one for inventing a load of confusing sophistries to try to justify the idiocy of the Church in trying to render disreputable any perfectly respectable pantsdown positions.
It is quite natural for that lady to fall backwards in such transports of emotion and exhaustion that she lost concentration on where her breech cloth was positioned. One might see normal concentration on the matter in the famous photograph of Marilyn Monroe.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Marilyn-Monroe-Dress-Blowing-10x8-Photo-/320443558245?pt=UK_DV