cicerone imposter
 
  -1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 04:13 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid, I think that's because the US leads Canada on many fronts, and it's only a matter of time when religion in public schools will show its ugly head in Canada.
spendius
 
  0  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 04:34 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
How one reacts to different stimuli is based on the individual's reaction to his/her environment.


That statement concedes the argument. In what aspect of non-human nature, organic or inorganic, can you find different reactions to the same stimulus?

How are the different individual reactions to stimuli conditioned? And which reactions have utility to society.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 04:56 pm
@spendius,
It depends on the stimuli.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 05:10 pm
@spendius,
Are you willing to take a course in neurobiology?
Ionus
 
  -4  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 05:32 pm
@failures art,
Quote:
Agnostic about gods, Atheistic about all the Gods I've been presented so far.
So which gods are you agnostic about exactly ?

Quote:
You have put in a great deal of labor trying to make atheists into faith based religionists.
Human beings have a need for magic. If they find that in religion or science, it doesnt matter they are achieving the same result...feelings of superiority.

Quote:
Those poor men on the ship, didn't fight for their life, because they failed to accept their mortality.
They were very much aware of what pain is and that death brings a finality to this world and suffering to their loved ones. They accepted death better than atheists. Do you really thing atheists accept death by fighting bitterly against reality ?

Quote:
But I'm also not letting my body go to ruin because of magical thinking about a second life.
Thats a puzzling comment. Are you saying only theists get fat ?

Quote:
I said you cannot disprove what has NEVER BEEN PROVEN.
Then you agree it takes a leap of faith to go either way ?

Quote:
So prove there is a fork in the road. If the road has infinite forked paths, then everywhere is a road. If everywhere is a road, then a road is meaningless. Prove there is a fork, but first prove there is a road.
I get the impression you have learnt some logic but have not had time to become skilled at it, but rather use the mechanics of it to bewilder yourself. You nave a straight line branching into two. If you do not know of any gods then you never meet the fork. If you know of even only one god then you must go down one. As there is no evidence for either choice, the mechanism is the same for both. A leap of faith.

Quote:
Do you need to disprove unicorns for them to not be real in your head?
But unicorns do exist in my head. Where do you think they exist ? I choose to make a leap of faith that they do not exist in an infinite universe or multi-verse. In fact, they probably do exist given the nature of infinity. You have chose to believe unicorns do not exist because you are desperate for stability.

Quote:
You're using a very common misuse of the word "aesthetics."
You're not using any definition of aesthetics that I can find.
Quote:
aes·thet·ic or es·thet·ic (s-thtk)
adj.
1. Relating to the philosophy or theories of aesthetics.
2. Of or concerning the appreciation of beauty or good taste: the aesthetic faculties.
3. Characterized by a heightened sensitivity to beauty.
4. Artistic: The play was an aesthetic success.
5. Informal Conforming to accepted notions of good taste.

Quote:
Aesthetics does not even imply positive or beautiful.
Yes, it does.
Quote:
Quote:
Faith is the dulling of the aesthetic experience on all levels.
As in a baptist choir ? Or stained glass windows ? Or the great cathedrals ?
Faith is not dull. It is a heightened awareness that enjoys the aesthetic.

Quote:
Quote:
So you dont think there are any stupid aetheists?
Sure. Atheism is not a measure of intelligence.
Then why do atheists spend so much time sneering at the intelligence of theists ? This is simple arrogance. If you cant build yourself up, then tear others down. It is all relative.

Quote:
Quote:
What about those who are raped by space aliens?
Or who believe in faeries?
Or who think Star Wars was a documentary?
What about them?
They are atheists. Lets talk about them too when we sneer at theists.

Quote:
I can speak to these claims without speaking to the intelligence of these made up individuals.
Oh they are real. It simply means you are biased when you only address one side.

You have been to atheist web sites and come away all flushed with importance at how you don't need faith to be an atheist. That is rubbish. You don't like faith because you think it is irrational yet you demonstrate that you have faith in many many things everyday. Admit your faith in your position of being an atheist. Or prove that God does not exist...(hint)...it is easier to prove a positive so the theists have a head start.




0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -3  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 05:45 pm
@failures art,
Quote:
That is dictating to me my own experiences. You are incapable of asserting such a thing.
No, it is dictating to you that your knowledge of psychology is limited. You are incapable of knowing your own artful dodges, arty. (apologies to Joseph Conrad)
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -3  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 05:49 pm
@wayne,
Quote:
If there are no atheists in foxholes what makes you think there were any in the water with the sharks?
It is not a black and white world. People who gave up in the water already had previous beliefs. The strongest previous beliefs were the first to go. There is a strong tendency for epople who realise they are about to die to consider God. The two statements, (a foxhole and the Indianaplois) are not mutually exclusive or even contradictory.
ehBeth
 
  0  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 05:51 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Intrepid, I think that's because the US leads Canada on many fronts,


interesting

certainly not my impression of things
Rockhead
 
  2  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 05:51 pm
@Ionus,
"There is a strong tendency for epople who realise they are about to die to consider God"

that does not make him or her any more real...
littlek
 
  4  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:01 pm
@Rockhead,
Rather it is likely how gods are created.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
It depends on the stimuli.


You can only mean that humans become like animals under suffering.

We are not suffering ci. A2Kers are not suffering creatures.

Do you always evade interesting questions with flippancies?

Why would atheists ever vary in their reaction to any stimulus?
Rockhead
 
  2  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:13 pm
@spendius,
"Do you always evade interesting questions with flippancies?"

you did not just say that...
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:16 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Are you willing to take a course in neurobiology?


Try me and see. Asking me that question is meaningless. I'm pretty well sold on the "preferred pathways" stuff and Proust's discussion on habit.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:21 pm
@Rockhead,
Quote:
you did not just say that...


I did indeed. I write many longish essays. Too long I am often told. They are rarely dealt with.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -2  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:31 pm
@failures art,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Faith is believing in that building in the middle of a park, going there, not finding a building, and then rejecting your experience to maintain a belief that the building MUST exist.
Are you say the building cant exist because you have never made a mistake or that you have been to the only park ?
I can't understand this question.
Perhaps if you read it again....

Quote:
Nothing about atheism demands that you have no proof.
Then prove there is no God. You do have proof right ?

Quote:
Quote:
Religious people have no proof of God existing.

Quite right.
Therefore it is an act of faith.
Quote:
Quote:
Atheists have no proof that God does not exist.

Nor do they need it.
That very statement requires an act of faith.


Quote:
I don't need to prove what a god didn't do, if I instead prove what what happened came by natural mechanisms.
Did God make the natural mechanisms and can you prove God didnt ?

Quote:
Agnostic isn't a state in conflict with atheism.
You.ve been to atheist web sites again havent you ? Agnosticism is awaiting knowledge. That means a prove God does exist or prove God doesnt exist. That could be a very long time.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

Ionus wrote: Skepticism does not involve an attack on others. That is the power of belief.
Show me a definition of belief that includes this.
You have made an error of logic. No definition of belief includes what it CAN do. But here is a definition anyway :

belief (bɪˈliːf) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]
—n
1. a principle, proposition, idea, etc, accepted as true
2. opinion; conviction
3. religious faith
4. trust or confidence, as in a person or a person's abilities, probity, etc

Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition
2009 © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins
Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009

So how is the acceptance of the proposition that God does not exist not a belief ?
Emphasis added. By your own definition YOU PROVIDED, it requires a belief to be in the affirmative. It does not define what is accepted as false, but true. Additionally, you didn't demonstrate where in the definition of belief comes attacking people. That was the reason I requested the definition in the first place. Your concession is noted.
But the concession is only in your mind. I take it you have accepted the definition that your belief in there not being a God is accepted as being true. Or are you arguing your belief in there not being a God is false ?

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
people who cannot be convinced in the existence of god. You talked about the faith they needed to maintain such a position. You now claim to accept that your non-belief in unicorns is faith based, and yet you also acknowledge a whole planet of them could exist? So if your faith assertion on atheists holds that they take a stance where they cannot be convinced of the existence of gods, how is it different from your unicorn faith? You imply directly that they could exist immediately after saying that you have faith they don't exist.
Please be serious or our conversation is at an end.
What is not serious?
On reflection, perhaps you simply don't understand rather than are trying some silly maneuver. It takes faith to believe in unicorns one way or the other. If it doesnt take faith, then I will expect your proof that they dont exist. I have added emphasis to one sentence. I though you were not serious because you explained it youraself after arguing it is a contradiction. There is no contradiction. You have actually scored an own goal.

Quote:
Quote:
How can you have skepticism about everything if not by an active belief ?
That's like saying you are always wearing the clothes you don't have on your body.
Your love of analogies shows your willingness to distort rather than argue reality.

Quote:
I said that that the more we learn about the natural history of the cosmos, the less and less convincing the claims of gods become.
Tell me how the Big Bang was created ? Tell me how infinity is understood ? Tell me how the increasing complexity of the universe is a natural force ?

Quote:
Quote:
Perhaps you are referring to the city of Troy when you say stories have been proven to be false.
That amongst others.
I cant wait to hear how the City of Troy doesnt exist.
Quote:

That's massaging cognitive dissonance.
Have you ever thought of writing something so it is intelligible ? If your thoughts are too complex for mere mortals to fathom, might I suggest you not condescend to share them with us ?

Quote:
Quote:
The mind of my cat is not concerned with rolling around on the grass in the backyard because it can hear a dog but knows it is not in this area.
You did nothing to clarify this.
You have no faith in there being a God because you have an easy well fed life where death is a block away.

Quote:
It comes from the failure of proposed gods to satisfy my criteria of belief.
Havent you been following ? Faith requires no set criteria. Just to humuor you, what criteria do you require to have faith ? There's an oxymoron if ever there was one.

Quote:
Again, agnosticism is about KNOWLEDGE. It is not about faith.
Which is why if you have no faith either way you are agnostic.

Quote:
Accepting god is an active process. It is not natural, but supernatural.
So primitive societies had supernatural powers ?

Quote:
Tell you what... Go climb in a foxhole, and if your arm or leg gets blown off, lets see if you call for a chaplain or a medic.
And before my arm gets blown off and I am terrified of dying ? Who will I call for then ? A medic ? Or will I say a little prayer to get me out alive ?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:32 pm
@Eorl,
Quote:
You must have thousands of faiths. The vast majority of which are anti-theistic.
I don't know about Spendi, but I fit that description.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:36 pm
@Rockhead,
Quote:
your basic premise has been, without god there are no "morals". I call bullshit.
When you can remove the environment influence from you, an environment that has Christian heritage, then you will be believable. In the meantime, it is wishful thinking and rather obvious at that.
Ionus
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
I cannot prove there is no potato monster.
We should proceed as if there is a potato monster.
Why ?
Rockhead
 
  2  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:37 pm
@Ionus,
nobody was speaking to you.

you have become an eysore...
Ionus
 
  1  
Sun 13 Feb, 2011 06:39 pm
@tenderfoot,
No one has to prove anything. Weren't you reading ? Faith requires no proof, exactly what is required for either side. Agnostics dont have faith either way, and require proof one way or the other.
 

Related Topics

The tolerant atheist - Discussion by Tuna
Another day when there is no God - Discussion by edgarblythe
church of atheism - Discussion by daredevil
Can An Atheist Have A Soul? - Discussion by spiritual anrkst
THE MAGIC BUS COMES TO CANADA - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism
  3. » Page 226
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 01/26/2025 at 01:44:00