@Ionus,
I think you are really overthinking this thread. The use of parallels and substitute concepts , while a nice try, falls on ears that say"SO WHAT?"
You have a path that you are comfortable following. Others have similar ones that dont coincide with yours, why try the missionary stomp on us animists?
You will never convince people who are used to evidence to reach their conclusions. You seem to insist that evidence neednt be payed any attention to , just "go with yer gut and believe in the big Kahoona in the sky ". AS a matter of fact, even my gut likes evidence. SO far, you , spendi and Intrepid have engaged in phrases arrived at by rote yet are totally free of anything concrete or even compelling as debate. WHere are ya going from here? will you cede back this thread to the people whove been interested in it on its original stated purpose and I, at least, wont follow you around anywhere ifyou wish to engage elsewhere in discussions with folks similarly convinced as you?