61
   

Proof of nonexistence of free will

 
 
brianjakub
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2018 12:12 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Quote:
When the distinction between the remark and the point is not self-evident!
By the way do you know what the point was about paradoxes?
Could it be self evident that there always something.
Quote:
Genesis 1 New American Standard Bible (NASB)
The Creation

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was [a]formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was [c]moving over the [d]surface of the waters.


Just one big huge quark. A singularity waiting to be divided up into quarks and higgs bosons by a Spirit Capable of turning it into matter by its Trinitarian character of Idea(God the Father) turned into words (Jesus the Living Word) which were stored as information in matter. (the universe)

I think the information in the universe "self evidently" reveals the author. (Just like your post reveals something about you) Patterns are information that mean something.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2018 12:13 pm
@cicerone imposter,
What about space, or time? We can conceive of them, but how are they material?
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2018 02:42 pm
@Olivier5,
They are material in the fact that they are described. https://www.quora.com/What-is-space-time-made-up-of-What-is-the-fabric-of-space-time
0 Replies
 
brianjakub
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2018 05:05 pm
@Olivier5,
Space time is made up of Higgs bozons that vibrate at a certain frequency. Before the Higgs field existed there was no time. There has to be some basic order to the universe or particles must vibrate of certain frequencies for us to have something to measure relative time with. The frequency of the first Higgs Bosons established the first "clocks" in the universe.
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2018 03:17 am
@brianjakub,
That's theory though. Is theory material?

I conclude the term "matter" is ambiguous. It means different things to different people.
brianjakub
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2018 08:21 am
@Olivier5,
But only one is logical and complete. It must include entropic gravity and matter and the Higgs Field really existing. The universe is not a figment of man’s imagination. Matter is ambiguous if you use only one of the many interpretations of physics. They are all correct. They are just from different points of view. Combine them all with entropic gravity and matter and the Higgs field become real. The problem is they also become more complex.
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2018 01:41 pm
@brianjakub,
It's just a vague concept, like so many others. In fact all concepts have vague boundaries, as per Saussure.
brianjakub
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 05:43 am
@Olivier5,
Could you explain your statement?
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 07:11 am
@brianjakub,
Contrary to computer languages and concepts, human languages and concepts are always ambiguous. The fancy term is "polysemic". It's both a strength and a weakness. It includes the idea that human language concepts are fuzy sets: their boundaries are vague. E.g. the boundary between a "house" and a "mansion" or between a "mansion" and a "castlle" are not neatly defined.
brianjakub
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 08:39 am
@Olivier5,
That is not true of physics. The equations and the measurements they predict are not very fuzzy.

I can picture a house, a mansion and a zebra. I can also picture the higgs field and the interior of an atom in the same way I can picture the interior of the transmission and rear end on a sixty three Buick.

You and I would agree the Buick drive train is easy to picture and explain mathematically. No fuzziness. The gears in the rear end and the transmission can be deduced from the mathematical ratios of the tachometer and transmission. The same can be done with the higgs field and matter.
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 09:51 am
@brianjakub,
Quantum physics is all about fuzyness though.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 10:09 am
@Olivier5,
Is that true about laws?
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 10:59 am
@cicerone imposter,
I think so. There's the spirit of the law, the letter of the law, and various interpretations of both.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2018 11:45 am
@Olivier5,
When I studied Business Law over 50 years ago, I remember something called "stare decisis." It's about precedence. “I think it’s disastrous for any liberal aspirations in terms of how the court will deal with issues of reproductive rights (or) affirmative action, going forward,” said University of Ottawa law professor and U.S. constitutional law expert Carissima Mathen. That means any justice selected by Trump will overturn past decisions on abortion and civil rights. Trump is a lose-lose president. He's a moron, a bigot, and a total ignoramus. His tariffs, wall, and selection of judges will affect our republic for a very long time in negative ways.
Trump just praised Putin. What more needs to be known about Trump's stupidity?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
DOES NOTHING EXIST??? - Question by mark noble
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2018 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/20/2018 at 04:39:07